Latham & Watkins vs Startup Fundraising: BigLaw

Latham & Watkins is a global BigLaw firm with a strong emerging companies practice.

Latham & Watkins vs Startup Fundraising

Latham & Watkins has become one of the more active BigLaw firms in venture financings, particularly for growth-stage and pre-IPO rounds. Occasionally founders ask if legal counsel overlaps with fundraise workflow. It doesn't.

What Latham actually does

Priced round documentation, especially growth-stage. Term sheet negotiation, secondaries, tender offers, IPO. Cross-border financings and complex M&A. Formation is available but not the primary offering.

Where Latham stops

No investor database, no thesis matching, no outreach workflow, no deck feedback. Latham handles legal execution once term sheets exist. Getting to the term sheet is separate.

When you need Latham

Series B and beyond, cross-border rounds, secondary tenders, and IPO prep. At seed or Series A a specialist emerging-companies firm (Cooley, WSGR, Fenwick, Gunderson, Orrick) is usually a better fit.

Latham vs alternatives

Peer BigLaw with venture practices: Kirkland, Skadden, Davis Polk, Goodwin. Specialist emerging-companies firms usually cost less and know the standard financing docs by heart.

Frequently asked questions

Does Latham help me find investors?
Occasional intros at growth stage, not systematic. Not what they're paid for.
Latham at seed?
Usually overkill. A specialist emerging-companies firm is a better fit and cost.
Latham vs Cooley for a Series B?
Both credible. Latham strength: cross-border, IPO prep. Cooley strength: pure emerging companies experience.

Related fundraising guides (40)

Investor directory · Fundraising library · Articles A–Z · Company funding database