How liquidation preferences work, why 1× non-participating is standard, and what to look for in participating or multiple preferences that can quietly.
Liquidation preference decides who gets paid first in an exit. On a good outcome it barely matters. On a middling outcome — the majority of exits — it decides whether founders keep meaningful proceeds.
The right for preferred shareholders to be paid a specified amount before common shareholders receive anything at exit. Expressed as a multiple (1×, 2×) and a type (non-participating, participating).
Investor gets the greater of (a) their money back, or (b) their pro-rata share of proceeds. This is the market default at seed and Series A. Rarely worth negotiating away — investors expect it and it's founder-friendly enough.
Investor gets their money back AND their pro-rata share of the remaining proceeds. Double dip. On a $100M exit with $20M raised at 1× participating and investors owning 50%, they take $20M + 50% of the remaining $80M = $60M. Non-participating would have paid them $50M.
2× or 3× multiples mean investors get 2–3× their money back before common sees a dollar. Common at growth-stage down rounds, catastrophic at earlier stages. If you see these at seed or Series A, walk unless the terms elsewhere are extraordinary.
Each round's preferences stack — Series B investors get paid before Series A, who get paid before seed. After several rounds with $50M+ preferences ahead of common, a $60M acquisition can leave founders with nothing.
Non-participating over participating. 1× over anything higher. A cap on participation (2× cap) if participation is unavoidable. Pari passu treatment across rounds if you're at a stage where preferences might stack.
Investor directory · Fundraising library · Articles A–Z · Company funding database