What micro VCs are, how they operate differently from larger funds, and how to identify the ones actively deploying versus the ones about to close.
Micro VCs — funds under $50M managing 30–60 investments — dominate pre-seed and seed rounds. Fast decisions, small checks, real operator experience. Also: high mortality rate. Choosing the right micro VC matters more than a household-name firm at this stage.
Fund size under $50M (some as small as $5–10M). Check sizes typically $100K–$1M. Often 1–3 partners, most of whom are former operators or angels who raised institutional capital. Portfolio of 30–60 companies per fund.
Faster decisions (often 1–2 meetings). No committee. Real operator experience. Willing to co-lead or fill out rounds. Access to sectors and geographies larger funds ignore.
Many micro VCs raise Fund I and never raise Fund II. Signals to check: is the fund actively investing (recent announcements)? What year did they raise? What percentage of the fund is deployed? A micro VC in year 4 with capital 'reserved' is often winding down without saying so.
Micro VCs rarely lead your Series A. If they can't participate pro-rata, the Series A lead may see the seed cap table as fragmented. Ask upfront: what's your reserves ratio? A 50/50 investment/reserves fund can follow strongly. A 90/10 fund can't.
Micro VCs with strong track records (early Precursor, Hustle Fund, Weekend Fund) carry meaningful signal. Micro VCs no one has heard of carry neutral signal — not negative, but not accelerating.
Track record: did their prior investments go on to raise Series A from top firms? Fund cycle: are they on Fund II or III? Operator background: what did the partners actually build? Portfolio founder references: what did they add beyond the check?
Investor directory · Fundraising library · Articles A–Z · Company funding database