The pipeline review is where a sales manager and rep look at every open deal together, stress-test the qualification, and decide the next move.
The pipeline review is a recurring 1:1 (typically weekly) where a rep walks a manager through every open opportunity, and the manager coaches on qualification, next steps, and risk. Its purpose is not to give the manager a status update — that's what the CRM is for — but to catch deals that are slipping, surface deals where the rep is unconsciously happy-eared, and jointly plan the moves for the coming week. The failure mode is treating it as a report-out: rep reads through the pipeline, manager nods, both agree everything is fine, deals continue to slip on their own trajectory.
Weekly 30-45 minutes per rep is standard. Twice weekly for reps managing high-velocity SMB pipeline; every two weeks for reps in long-cycle enterprise with 5-15 deals. Manager comes prepared — has pre-read the pipeline the day before, marked 3-5 deals to dig into, and knows the specific risk on each. Rep comes prepared — has updated CRM with weekly progress, has a concrete ask (help getting to the CFO, review of a proposal, joint call). Meetings without preparation on both sides become status updates by default.
Use MEDDICC, BANT, or SPICED — the specific framework matters less than using one consistently. For each deal, the manager asks the same questions: (M) what economic Metric will the customer measure success on? (E) who is the Economic buyer, and have we met them? (D) what's the Decision process, and where are we in it? (D) what are the Decision criteria, and have we influenced them? (I) what pain is Identified, and has the champion articulated it in their words? (C) who is the Champion, and can they navigate their org? (C) what Competition exists (including do-nothing), and how do we win? If the rep can't answer with specifics, the deal is not qualified and forecasting it as commit is fantasy.
Start with the top of the funnel (pipeline coverage): does the rep have 3-4x quota in stage 2+ pipeline for the next quarter? If not, the highest-leverage discussion is pipeline generation, not deal review. Then triage: (a) commit deals (>80% likely this quarter) — spend most time here, sharpest questions, highest scrutiny. (b) best case (50-80%) — what's the specific action to move to commit? (c) upside (25-50%) — what qualification is missing? (d) longshots (<25%) — should we deprioritize or disqualify? Explicitly disqualify at least one deal per review — reps hate this, but a pipeline padded with dead deals hides the real coverage problem.
The manager's job is not to run the deal — it's to develop the rep's ability to run it. When a rep says 'they said they'd get back to me,' the manager asks 'what does the mutual action plan say happens next Tuesday?' rather than 'ok, let's follow up.' When a rep is convinced a deal will close and the manager sees warning signs (no economic buyer identified, procurement not engaged, single-threaded champion), the manager surfaces the concern and asks the rep to articulate the mitigation. Coaching should be Socratic: 90% questions, 10% directives. Directives should be reserved for deals where the rep clearly can't see the risk.
The pipeline review is where forecast is set for the week's reporting. Reps commit deals; managers accept or push back; the aggregated commit number goes up to the VP of Sales's forecast. When the actual quarter comes in wildly off (>15% miss), do a rigorous look-back at which deals moved and why they weren't caught in reviews — this is how forecast accuracy improves. Managers who consistently over-forecast should be coached; the entire company's operating plan (hiring, spend, board expectations) depends on the forecast being defensible.
Investor directory · Fundraising library · Articles A–Z · Company funding database