Problem Slide Statistics: 7 Real Pitch Deck Examples

Which number should lead your problem slide? Seven real problem slides compared: one headline figure with a gap, stacked evidence, your own user data.

Problem Slide Statistics: Choosing the Number That Proves the Pain

Most problem slides use a statistic. This guide compares seven real ones to answer a narrower question: which number should you lead with, and how should you show where it came from?

TL;DR

Lead with the one number that shows the gap between what customers need and what they get today, and show its source on the slide. Charta Health does this in two lines: "100% of US healthcare providers review medical charts", "costing at least $85 billion every year", then "less than 2% of charts are actually reviewed". inDinero uses its own customers instead of market research: "90% of our users have never tried using QuickBooks before". Womco and Hive show sources on the slide (research references and a named source). Hardbacon shows four percentages at equal weight, so no single number leads, and Front's figures (215 billion emails a day, 54% business email) show that email is big rather than that it is painful.

Problem slides that use statistics

Each example shows the exact stored slide above its analysis and links to the full teardown. Stronger examples first. Statistics are quoted as shown on the slides; we have not verified them.

Charta Health problem slide — slide 2

Software for reviewing medical charts. A two-sentence problem slide with no images.

Charta Health pitch deck problem slide 2
Charta Health deck, slide 2. Exact stored slide matched to this analysis.

Our analysis: The "Yet" turns market size into a gap the product can close.

Evidence and limitation: Three numbers set up one contrast: everyone does this, it costs a lot, and almost none of it gets done. No source is shown on the slide.

What a founder can adapt: Write your problem as a sentence with a turn: what everyone does or spends, then how little of it works.

Supporting analysis

What the deck claims: "100% of US healthcare providers review medical charts for revenue and clinical opportunities, costing at least $85 billion every year." "Yet, less than 2% of charts are actually reviewed."

Presentation choice: An investor remembers "less than 2%" because it is the problem in one figure.

When it does not fit: Add a source for the $85 billion and 2% figures; as shown, both are unattributed company claims.

Read the Charta Health deck teardown

Empowerly problem slide — slide 3

College and career counselling. One problem sentence and four supporting figures beside a photo.

Empowerly pitch deck problem slide 3
Empowerly deck, slide 3. Exact stored slide matched to this analysis.

Our analysis: A stack that works because no two numbers make the same point.

Evidence and limitation: Each figure covers a different side of the problem: too few counsellors, too little time, more applications, harder admissions.

What a founder can adapt: If you use several numbers, give each one a different job: supply, time, workload, stakes.

Supporting analysis

What the deck claims: "Students lack personalized, accessible, high-quality college and career guidance." "470:1 average student to high school counselor ratio." "38 minutes of counseling on average per student per year." "12+ college applications on average per student." "50% drop since 2010 top university admission rates."

Presentation choice: Together the four figures explain why students need more help than schools can give.

When it does not fit: No sources are shown; add a footnote for each figure.

Read the Empowerly deck teardown

inDinero problem slide — slide 2

Finance software for small businesses. Three problem statements, one statistic and three user posts.

inDinero pitch deck problem slide 2
inDinero deck, slide 2. Exact stored slide matched to this analysis.

Our analysis: Clear about whose number it is, which makes it hard to dispute and shows the company already has users.

Evidence and limitation: The one statistic comes from the company's own users and says so.

What a founder can adapt: If you have users or survey respondents, use a number from them and say how many people it covers.

Supporting analysis

What the deck claims: "Business owners don't do accounting. 90% of our users have never tried using QuickBooks before." "Business owners don't plan their finances." "No automated solution to tracking finances. QuickBooks + Excel are still manual ways to record transactions." Three social posts complain about QuickBooks.

Presentation choice: Early-stage founders often have better data on their own users than on the market; saying "our users" makes that a strength.

When it does not fit: Say how many users the 90% is based on; without it the figure's weight is unclear.

Read the inDinero deck teardown

Womco problem slide — slide 2

Women's hormonal health. Three large percentages with footnoted references.

Womco pitch deck problem slide 2
Womco deck, slide 2. Exact stored slide matched to this analysis.

Our analysis: The only slide here where a reader can check where every number came from.

Evidence and limitation: Each figure carries a superscript linked to a reference on the slide.

What a founder can adapt: Add small numbered footnotes for any research figure, especially in health, finance or other regulated areas.

Supporting analysis

What the deck claims: "85% Women suffer from hormonal imbalances." "64% Women experience symptoms that disturb their daily lives." "50% Women regularly use painkillers for menstrual pain relief." Footnotes at the bottom of the slide give two research references.

Presentation choice: Health claims draw scrutiny; visible references answer the first diligence question in advance.

When it does not fit: The three numbers get more severe from prevalence to daily impact to painkiller use; lead with the one closest to what your product fixes.

Read the Womco deck teardown

Hive problem slide — slide 4

Employee feedback software. One headline figure explained with an iceberg diagram.

Hive pitch deck problem slide 4
Hive deck, slide 4. Exact stored slide matched to this analysis.

Our analysis: The headline figure alone makes the case; the diagram shows the buyer where the information is lost.

Evidence and limitation: A single headline number, a diagram that shows the drop at each level and a named source.

What a founder can adapt: Turn your key number into a simple picture of where the problem happens.

Supporting analysis

What the deck claims: "Only 4% of problems are known to executives." "9% of problems are visible to middle managers." "74% of problems are visible to supervisors." "100% of problems are visible to frontline employees." "Source: Sidney Yoshida."

Presentation choice: It gives an executive buyer a reason to care: they are the people who see least.

When it does not fit: A name alone is a thin citation; give the publication and year so an investor can find it.

Read the Hive deck teardown

Hardbacon problem slide — slide 2

Personal finance app for Canadians. Four ring charts at equal size.

Hardbacon pitch deck problem slide 2
Hardbacon deck, slide 2. Exact stored slide matched to this analysis.

Our analysis: Every number gets the same size and colour, so the slide has no headline; a reader has to decide which problem matters most.

Evidence and limitation: Four figures between 51% and 65%, each describing a different gap, with no source on the slide.

What a founder can adapt: Pick the one gap your product closes first and make it the headline; move the others into small text or the appendix.

Supporting analysis

What the deck claims: "No plan: 65% of Canadians do not have a financial planner…" "No budget: 51% of Canadians report not having a budget…" "No investment: 60% of Canadians who would like to invest don't do it because they are not confident…" "No financial tips: 59% of Canadians aged 18-34 rely primarily on asking their friends' and family's opinion…"

Presentation choice: Useful contrast with Charta Health: more numbers, less focus.

When it does not fit: Don't give four statistics equal weight; the figures are also unattributed.

Read the Hardbacon deck teardown

Front problem slide — slide 2

Shared email for teams. Three market figures above three problem icons.

Front pitch deck problem slide 2
Front deck, slide 2. Exact stored slide matched to this analysis.

Our analysis: The statistics support a market-size point, while the problem itself goes unquantified.

Evidence and limitation: The numbers show email is large and growing; the pain appears only as three icon labels with no figures.

What a founder can adapt: If your top numbers describe the market, add one that measures the pain, such as time lost or errors made.

Supporting analysis

What the deck claims: "Email is the most important business communication channel." "215 billion emails sent per day." "54% are business emails." "7% year-on-year growth." "But email is a tool designed for personal use": "Not collaborative", "Bad productivity", "Error-prone".

Presentation choice: Contrast: the numbers are prominent but don't measure the problem the product solves.

When it does not fit: Don't let market-size figures stand in for problem evidence.

Read the Front deck teardown

How each slide uses numbers

Whether the lead number shows pain or size, how many figures compete for attention and whether the source is visible.

ExampleLead numberShowsFigures shownSource on slide
Charta HealthLess than 2% of charts reviewedGap3No
Empowerly470:1 student to counsellorShortage4 (different jobs)No
inDinero90% of our users never tried QuickBooksBehaviour1Own users
Womco85% of womenPrevalence3Yes (references)
HiveOnly 4% known to executivesGap4 (one headline)Named source
HardbaconNone (four equal)Several gaps4 (equal weight)No
Front215 billion emails a dayMarket size3No

Key Takeaways

  • One headline number beats four equal ones.
  • The strongest number shows a gap, not a market size.
  • Your own customer data is persuasive when you say whose it is.
  • Put the source on the slide, even as a small footnote.
  • Supporting numbers should each add a new piece of the problem.

Choose your problem statistic

List every number you could use, then keep the one that shows the gap most clearly.

  1. Candidates. Every figure you have about the problem: market research, public data, your own users or survey.
  2. Pain or size. Mark each one: does it show something failing, or just that the area is big?
  3. Headline. The one pain figure your product changes most directly.
  4. Support. At most two more figures, each describing a different part of the problem.
  5. Source. Where each figure comes from, in a footnote: study, dataset or "our N users".

Copyable framework: [Who] [does or spends X] — yet only [headline figure] [outcome]. Source: [study, year] or [N of our users].

Illustrative example 1 — written by us

Before: 65% of Canadians do not have a financial planner. 51% report not having a budget. 60% who would like to invest don't. 59% aged 18-34 rely on friends and family.

After: Only [X]% of Canadians aged 18-34 get financial advice from anyone but friends and family. [Supporting figure on budgeting.] Source: [survey, year].

What improved: Our illustrative rewrite; not Hardbacon's wording. It leads with the figure closest to a young user and adds the missing source.

What this guide adds

The general problem slide guide covers how to frame a customer's pain, and the industry guides show how that looks in each sector. This page covers one decision every founder makes on that slide: which statistic to use, how many to show and how to cite them.

Four of these decks (Charta Health, Empowerly, inDinero, Hive) also appear in other guides for a different lesson; here we look only at how they use numbers. Hardbacon and Womco appear for the first time.

Three questions to ask of any problem statistic

Does it show pain or just size? "215 billion emails a day" shows size. "Less than 2% of charts are actually reviewed" shows a failure.

Whose number is it? A figure from your own users, a named study or a public dataset each carries different weight. An unattributed figure invites the question.

Does each extra number add something? Empowerly's four numbers each describe a different part of the counselling shortage. Hardbacon's four repeat the same kind of point.

Common mistakes

Diagnostic checklist

  • One headline number that shows a gap.
  • No more than two supporting figures.
  • Each figure makes a different point.
  • Source or sample on the slide.
  • Numbers tied to what your product fixes.

Frequently asked questions

How we chose these examples

Related

Resources
Join free
Sign Out Dashboard

The Startup Fundraising Platform

Raise funds for your startup

Find the right investors and get real replies — instantly, powered by AI.

  • AI-scored pitch deck
  • Matched investor list
  • Personalized outreach drafts
Join for free

Takes 30 seconds · No credit card · Cancel anytime

See it in action ↓
  • Library
  • Articles
  • Pitch Decks
  • Videos
  • Shorts
  • Profiles
  • Visuals
  • Questions
  • Ask
  • All
  • Seed & Pre-Seed
  • Series A & B
  • Fintech
  • SaaS & Dev Tools
  • Consumer & Social
  • Marketplace & Frontier
  • Mistakes to Avoid
  • Checklist
  • How to Send
  • Design
  • Length
  • Order
  • Storytelling
  • Investor Q&A
  • One-Pager
  • Email Templates
  • Data Room
  • Investor Update
  • Term Sheet
  • SAFE vs Priced
  • Due Diligence
  • Timeline
  • Metrics
  • Valuation
  • Cap Table
  • Pipeline
  • Board
  • Objections
  • References
  • Closing
  • Bridge Round
  • Down Round
  • Secondary Sale
  • Investor Rejection
  • First Meeting
  • Second Meeting
  • Partner Meeting
  • Post-Mortem
  • Update Cadence
  • Angel Round
  • Option Pool Shuffle
  • Fundraise Pause
  • Vetting VCs
  • First 90 Days
  • First Board Meeting
  • Reference Calls
  • NDA Template
  • Bylaws Template
LibraryPitch Deck Examples

Slide-by-slide guide

 

  • Library
  • Articles
  • Pitch Decks
  • Videos
  • Shorts
  • Profiles
  • Visuals
  • Questions
  • Ask
LibraryArticles

•By Alejandro Cremades