SVB Fundraising 101 Pitch Deck Teardown: A Tactical Guide

An analysis of Silicon Valley Bank's 2018 Fundraising 101 deck, detailing NYC seed trends, investor qualification.

The Fundraising 101 deck by Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) serves as a tactical primer for early-stage founders, specifically tailored to the New York City ecosystem circa 2018. Rather than pitching a product, the deck pitches a process, emphasizing that a typical raise takes 3-6 months and advising founders to avoid end-of-year and summer holiday periods. It provides granular data on NYC pre-seed round sizes, which typically ranged from $250K to $750K, and notes that the average NYC seed round reached $2MM by Q4 2017. The deck is notable for its blunt honesty regarding 'No' signals from investors…

Key takeaways

Introduction: The SVB Early Stage Playbook

The Fundraising 101 deck from Silicon Valley Bank’s Early Stage Practice is not a traditional startup pitch deck. Instead, it is a pedagogical tool designed to demystify the venture capital process for founders in the New York City ecosystem. Published in April 2018, the deck offers a snapshot of a market in transition, where seed rounds were ballooning and the 'unwritten rules' of VC engagement were being codified for a new generation of entrepreneurs. The deck is structured as a workshop, moving from high-level strategy to granular NYC-specific data.

Slide 1: Title and Context

The cover slide establishes the source: SVB's Early Stage Practice, dated April 2018. The imagery of hands planting a seedling is a standard metaphor for early-stage investing, but the branding is the key element here. SVB positioned itself as the central node in the startup ecosystem, a theme reinforced in the subsequent slides.

Slide 3: The Ecosystem Role

Slide 3 uses a simple Venn diagram to define SVB’s value proposition. The bank places itself at the intersection of 'Founders' and 'VCs.' The stated goal is to 'increase your odds of success.' This slide is a classic example of positioning a service provider as a strategic partner rather than a mere utility. By sitting between the capital and the talent, SVB claims a vantage point that allows them to provide the advice contained in the rest of the deck.

Slide 4: The Disclaimers

Slide 4 is critical for managing expectations. It notes that 'every deal is different' and that the data is 'NYC focused.' Most importantly, it acknowledges that 'fundraising and valuation norms shift yearly,' citing the 2016-2018 trend period. This is an honest admission that venture capital is a momentum-driven industry where advice has a short shelf life.

Slide 5: The Fundraising Timeline

This is one of the most tactical slides in the deck. It uses a calendar visual to show that fundraising is a seasonal activity. 'Average raise takes 3-6 months from start to term sheet,' the slide notes. It explicitly crosses out August and December, advising founders to 'avoid EOY and summer holidays.' For a founder, this slide serves as a reality check on runway management; if you have three months of cash left, you are already behind the curve.

Slide 6: Qualifying Investors

Slide 6 outlines six pillars for qualifying a VC: Stage, Location, Sector, Size, Vintage, and Activity. The 'Vintage' and 'Activity' points are often overlooked by novice founders. Vintage asks if the fund is still actively making new investments or if they are at the end of their fund life. Activity checks for 'competitive co’s,' which would likely preclude an investment due to conflict of interest.

Slide 7: The Lead Investor

Slide 7 defines the 'Lead Investor' as the entity that 'initiates the deal' and 'sets terms.' The deck provides a specific metric for commitment: 'typically 1/3 - 1/2 of round.' It also notes that while board seats are optional at the seed stage, they are 'almost always' required at Series A. This slide emphasizes that a round doesn't truly exist until a lead is secured.

Slide 8: NYC Pre-Seed Landscape

This slide provides a list of active NYC pre-seed investors, including firms like BoldStart, Box Group, Lerer Hippeau, and Primary Venture Partners. It defines the pre-seed round size in NYC as '$250K to $750K.' This data point is a valuable historical marker for how 'pre-seed' was defined in the late 2010s before the massive capital influx of 2020-2021.

Slide 9: Seed and Series A VCs in NY

Slide 9 provides a table of the most active VCs for rounds under $5M in 2017/2018. Lerer Hippeau Ventures and Techstars Ventures top the list with 8 deals each. Other notable firms include Flybridge Capital Partners (7 deals) and NEA (6 deals). The inclusion of URLs and deal counts makes this a highly functional 'cheat sheet' for founders building their target investor lists.

Slide 11: Meeting Preparation

The advice on Slide 11 is blunt: 'Don’t ask for an NDA at the outset.' This is a classic 'rookie mistake' indicator in the VC world. It also advises founders to have both a deck and a one-pager ready but to 'don’t plan to use either,' suggesting that the best first meetings are conversational rather than presentation-heavy. The final bullet point, 'Know that you’re not going to get a check today,' manages the founder's emotional expectations.

Slide 12: Decoding the 'No'

Slide 12 provides a list of reasons why an investor might pass. It highlights that a 'No' isn't always about the company's quality. It could be a 'Lack of capital to deploy' or 'Concern on sub-sector.' This transparency helps founders avoid over-rotating on feedback that might be specific to the internal dynamics of a venture fund rather than the startup's fundamentals.

Slide 13: The 'Mic Drop'

Slide 13 is a transition slide featuring a 'mic drop' graphic and the question 'You've raised money?' It serves as a psychological break in the presentation, moving from the 'how-to' of the raise to the market data of what happens after.

Slide 25: Seed Round Growth Trends

Slide 25 contains a line graph showing the 'Growth in Average NYC Seed Deal.' The average deal rose from $897K in 2010 to $1.59MM in 2017. A sub-header notes that by 'Q4 2017 average NYC seed round size reached $2MM.' This data illustrates the 'seed extension' or 'jumbo seed' trend that began to dominate the market during this era.

Slide 27: Valuation Drivers

Slide 27 breaks down the components of a valuation. It lists Median stage valuation, Founding Team (prev. exits, unique expertise), Sector Activity, and Ownership Math. The 'Ownership Math' point is particularly insightful, explaining that VCs 'back into ownership % based on exit.' This means valuations aren't just about the company's current worth, but about the VC's need to own a specific percentage of the cap table to make their fund economics work.

Slide 28: Types of Investors

The final slide in the provided set lists the various sources of capital: Institutional funds, Strategic Investors, Angels, Crowdfunding, and Non-dilutive sources. Interestingly, it lists 'Revenue!' as the first non-dilutive source, followed by Grants and Venture Debt. This serves as a reminder that venture capital is just one tool in the financing toolbox.

What Works in This Deck

The deck excels at providing tactical, region-specific data. By focusing strictly on the NYC market and providing specific round sizes ($250K-$750K for pre-seed, $2MM for seed), it removes the ambiguity that often plagues fundraising advice. The inclusion of a 'hit list' of active investors (Slide 9) adds immediate utility for the audience. Furthermore, the 'Insider Tips' on Slide 5 regarding the 3-6 month timeline and seasonal dead zones are essential pieces of 'tribal knowledge' that founders often learn the hard way.

What Is Missing

As this is a workshop deck rather than a startup pitch, it lacks a specific 'Ask' or 'Team' slide in the traditional sense. However, from a pedagogical standpoint, it omits a deep dive into legal costs and closing mechanics. While it mentions that a lead investor sets the terms, it does not detail the difference between a priced round and a SAFE/Convertible Note, which was a major point of discussion in 2018. Additionally, while it mentions 'Ownership Math,' it doesn't provide a visual example of how dilution works across multiple rounds, which is often the most confusing part of the process for first-time founders.

Founder Takeaways

Founders should emulate the transparency and data-driven approach found in the market analysis slides. When pitching, having a clear understanding of the 'Ownership Math' (Slide 27) allows a founder to speak the same language as the VC. The qualification criteria on Slide 6 should be used by every founder to build their CRM; pitching a 'Series A' fund for a 'Pre-Seed' round is a waste of time that this deck explicitly helps avoid. Finally, the timeline expectations on Slide 5 should be the foundation of any financial planning—never assume a raise will take less than six months.

Frequently asked questions

How long does a typical startup fundraise take according to SVB?
According to slide 5, the average raise takes between 3 to 6 months from the initial start to the signing of a term sheet. This timeline suggests that founders must plan their runway carefully, as the process is rarely instantaneous and involves significant lead time before capital hits the bank.
What were the typical NYC pre-seed round sizes in 2018?
Slide 8 specifies that pre-seed investors in New York City typically participated in rounds ranging from $250,000 to $750,000. These rounds were generally aimed at pre-launch startups, providing the initial capital necessary to build a product or reach a specific early milestone before a larger seed round.
What role does a lead investor play in a round?
As detailed on slide 7, a lead investor is the catalyst for the deal. They set the terms for the round, provide social proof to attract follow-on investors, and typically commit to 33% to 50% of the total round size. At the Series A stage, they almost always require a board seat.
What are the common reasons an investor might say 'No'?
Slide 12 lists several reasons beyond just 'bad product.' These include the company being too early for the fund's mandate, a lack of chemistry with the team, the fund having no remaining capital to deploy, existing competitive investments in the portfolio, or specific concerns regarding the startup's sub-sector.
How did NYC seed round sizes change between 2010 and 2017?
Slide 25 illustrates a consistent upward trend. In 2010, the average NYC seed deal was $897,000. By 2017, this figure had nearly doubled to $1.59 million, with the text noting that the average seed round size actually reached $2 million by the fourth quarter of 2017.

Fundraising 101 NYC (SVB Early Stage Practice) pitch deck: the facts

Company
Fundraising 101 NYC (SVB Early Stage Practice)
Year
2018
Stage
Early Stage Workshop
Slides
30
Sector
Venture Capital / Financial Services
Deck type
Educational / Workshop
Outcome
N/A (Educational Resource)
Headquarters
New York City, USA

Fundraising 101 NYC (SVB Early Stage Practice) pitch deck PDF

The full Fundraising 101 NYC (SVB Early Stage Practice) deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

Related fundraising guides (24)

Decks from the same year (1)

Decks from the same region (1)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database