The 'Raising Capital' deck by Bryan Starbuck is a 24-slide educational presentation designed for first-time internet startup founders. Rather than pitching a specific product, it pitches a methodology for fundraising, emphasizing the psychological shift investors undergo from skepticism to interest. The deck is notable for its granular advice on the 'VC process,' suggesting that deals become 'stale' after four months and recommending that Seattle-based founders move to the Bay Area for five months to secure better terms. It includes specific valuation ranges for seed rounds under $2 million,…
Key takeaways
- Investors typically view 95% of companies as not good enough, requiring a warm introduction to overcome initial hesitation as shown on slide 4.
- Founders must focus on four 'WOW' factors: a real problem, a unique solution, willingness to pay, and a huge market according to slide 5.
- The deck suggests a specific 10-minute pitch anatomy, allocating the first 3 minutes to problem, solution, and traction as illustrated on slide 2.
- Valuation benchmarks for rounds under $2 million range from $1 million for a validated idea to $10 million for 'Hot in Valley' companies post-revenue on slide 17.
- The fundraising process is described as a 'batch' system, where founders should target approximately 6 VC firms at a time to create competitive tension per slide 16.
- A deal is considered 'stale' after 4 months in the market, making meetings after this point largely ineffective according to slide 16.
- Seattle-based startups are advised to move to the Bay Area for 5 months because Seattle investors often demand priced rounds instead of convertible notes as noted on slide 19.
- The deck recommends hiring a 'rent-a-CFO' at $150 to $270 per hour to spend 3 to 7 hours creating detailed financial projections on slide 15.
Presentation Overview
The 'Raising Capital' deck by Bryan Starbuck is a tactical guide for first-time founders of internet startups. It functions as a playbook for navigating the transition from a 'validated idea' to a funded company. The deck is structured into four primary phases: understanding the investor mindset, finding investors, the mechanics of closing, and regional nuances between Seattle and Silicon Valley.
Slide 1: Title and Credentials
The cover slide introduces Bryan Starbuck, Founder/CEO of Empower.me and former founder of TalentSpring (acquired in 2010). It explicitly states the target audience: 'First-Time Founders' of 'internet startups' seeking capital from 'venture capitalists and angels.' This sets a narrow, professional scope for the advice that follows.
Slide 2: The Pitch Deck Anatomy
This slide features a graphic titled 'The Anatomy of the 10 Minute Pitch,' credited to the Alliance of Angels (2007). It breaks down a pitch into specific time blocks. The first 30 seconds are for the introduction. The core narrative—Problem, Solution, and Traction—is expected to be completed by the 3-minute mark. The remaining 7 minutes cover operational details like Market Size, Sales Strategy, Competition, and Financials, ending with 'The Offer' at 10 minutes. This emphasizes brevity and front-loading the most compelling 'why' of the business.
Slides 3-7: The Investor Psychology
These slides address the 'Critical' need to understand the investor's perspective. Slide 4 uses a stock photo of a skeptical man to represent the 95% of companies that 'aren't good enough.' Slide 5 lists the four 'WOW' factors required to move an investor from skepticism to interest: a real and huge problem, a unique solution, a huge market, and proof that people will pay. Slide 6 shows the investor's shift to being 'impressed,' at which point they focus on 'blockers.' Slide 7 provides a checklist of these potential deal-killers, including the team, acquisition plan, sales model, and exit availability. The slide concludes that final decisions are determined by 'Rapport, trust, terms, team and finalizing details.'
Slides 8-10: Finding Investors
This section differentiates between finding Angels and VCs. For Angels (Slide 9), the deck recommends AngelList, LinkedIn, and networking through CEOs who have previously raised capital. It suggests that 'top big law firms' can provide introductions. For VCs (Slide 10), the advice is more targeted: research which partners match your stage and industry, and always start with a Partner rather than an Associate. It lists TheFunded and AngelList as primary research tools.
Slides 11-13: Closing Funding
Closing is presented as a multi-step funnel. Slide 12 details the Angel process, emphasizing 'Due Diligence' (specifically for angel groups) and the importance of rapport. Slide 13 outlines the VC process, which involves 2 to 4 meetings and a mandatory 'Monday partner meeting' before a term sheet is issued. The final step is described as 'Sheppard details until big stack of legal docs signed.'
Slides 14-16: Strategic Execution
Slide 14 discusses 'Herd Mentality,' noting that investors are more likely to move if they fear losing out to others. It stresses the need to 'force enough demand' to close. Slide 15 offers a very specific tactical tip: hire a 'rent-a-CFO' for $150 to $270 per hour to build financial models, suggesting this takes only 3 to 7 hours. Slide 16 introduces the concept of 'batching' VC outreach. By pitching 6 firms at a time, founders can synchronize their progress to arrive at multiple term sheets simultaneously. It warns that after 4 months, a deal becomes 'stale' and ineffective to pitch.
Slides 17-19: Valuations and Regional Differences
Slide 17 is perhaps the most data-dense, providing a chart of pre-money valuations for rounds under $2 million. It tracks valuation growth from 'Validated Idea' ($1M-$2M) to 'Post-Traction' ($3M-$10M+). It notes that for rounds over $2 million, investors typically take 33% to 48% of the company. Slide 18 argues that a $1M-$2M round is often better than a $500k round because early-stage burn rates typically sit between $50k and $70k per month. Slide 19, 'Seattle Notes,' provides a candid critique of the Seattle investment scene, claiming local investors demand priced rounds while Valley investors use convertible notes. It 'HIGHLY RECOMMENDS' moving to the Bay Area for 5 months to raise capital.
Slides 20-24: Resources and Conclusion
The final slides provide a bibliography for founders. 'Absolute Must Reads' (Slide 21) include Venture Deals by Brad Feld, Art of the Start by Guy Kawasaki, and The Lean Startup by Eric Ries. Slide 23 includes links to Dave McClure’s marketing models and Bryan Starbuck’s own blog. The deck concludes on Slide 24 with a call to join a 'Microsoft Startup Learning' mailing list.
What Works in This Deck
Granular Benchmarks: The valuation chart on slide 17 provides concrete numbers that founders can use to anchor their expectations, which is rare in general advice decks. · Process Timing: Defining the 'stale deal' window as 4 months (slide 16) gives founders a clear deadline for their fundraising sprints. · Psychological Framing: The transition from 'skepticism' to 'blocker-hunting' (slides 4-6) accurately describes the due diligence process. · Regional Honesty: The specific advice regarding Seattle vs. the Bay Area (slide 19) provides high-value strategic guidance for Pacific Northwest founders.
What Is Missing
Modern Instruments: As an older deck, it focuses heavily on convertible notes and priced rounds but does not mention SAFEs (Simple Agreement for Future Equity), which have since become the standard for early-stage Silicon Valley deals. · Equity Crowdfunding: The 'Finding Investors' section predates the widespread use of equity crowdfunding platforms beyond the early days of AngelList. · Diversity of Exits: The deck assumes a binary of 'success' or 'fail,' without discussing secondary markets or the 'acqui-hire' path in detail.
Founder Takeaways
Batch Your Outreach: Do not pitch VCs one by one. Use the 'batch of 6' method from slide 16 to ensure you have multiple conversations reaching the term sheet stage at the same time. · Front-Load the Pitch: Follow the 10-minute anatomy on slide 2. If you haven't explained the problem, solution, and traction within the first 180 seconds, you have likely lost the room. · Professionalize the Financials: The advice to hire a part-time CFO for a few hours (slide 15) is a low-cost way to ensure your projections look professional and stand up to due diligence. · Watch the Clock: Fundraising is a full-time job with a 120-day shelf life. If you haven't closed in 4 months, you need to change your strategy or your product before re-entering the market.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the recommended structure for a 10-minute pitch?
- According to slide 2, the 'Anatomy of the 10 Minute Pitch' starts with a 30-second introduction. The first three minutes should cover the Problem, Solution, and Traction. The middle section addresses Market Size, Customers, Sales Strategy, and Partners. The final two minutes are reserved for the Revenue Model, Competition, Management, Advisory Board, Financials, and 'The Offer.'
- How does geography affect startup valuation according to this deck?
- Slide 17 provides a chart showing that 'Valley' and 'Hot in Valley' companies command significantly higher pre-money valuations than those 'Outside Valley.' For example, a launched product outside the valley might be valued at $3 million, whereas a 'Hot in Valley' startup at the same stage could reach $8 million to $10 million.
- What are the specific steps for closing an Angel investor versus a VC?
- Slide 12 outlines a 6-step process for Angels: Pitch/Demo, Financial Review, Due Diligence, Q&A, Rapport building, and Legal closing. Slide 13 notes that VCs require 2 to 4 meetings, a presentation to a 'Monday partner meeting,' and a negotiated term sheet before moving to the final legal documentation stack.
- Why does the author recommend moving to the Bay Area for five months?
- Slide 19 explicitly recommends this move to avoid the funding challenges of the Seattle market. The author notes that Seattle investors often demand priced rounds by policy, whereas Silicon Valley investors are more comfortable with convertible notes for seed rounds, which are generally more founder-friendly.
- What is the 'stale deal' risk mentioned in the presentation?
- Slide 16 warns that if a founder has been fundraising for more than four months, VCs will likely have heard about the company and concluded it is a 'stale deal.' At this point, the presentation suggests that further meetings will be ineffective, emphasizing the need to close rounds quickly through batched outreach.