European Angel Landscape Pitch Deck Teardown: A Deep Dive

An analysis of Matthias Hilpert's 2017 presentation on the European angel investor ecosystem, featuring data on valuations, stages, and investor profiles.

The 'European Angel Investor Landscape' deck, presented by Matthias Hilpert at PODIM 2017, serves as an educational framework for founders navigating the early-stage ecosystem. Rather than pitching a specific startup, the 16-slide deck outlines the mechanics of angel investing in Europe, specifically highlighting Berlin as a hub. It provides specific benchmarks for Seed 1 and Seed 2 rounds, including monthly revenue targets (EUR 5-10K for Seed 1) and valuation ranges (EUR 1-2mio for Seed 1). The deck categorizes angel investors into four distinct profiles—C-Level Execs, Exited Founders, Profe…

Key takeaways

Introduction and Context

The "European Angel Investor Landscape" deck is not a traditional startup pitch but rather an ecosystem overview presented by Matthias Hilpert at the PODIM conference in Ljubljana in 2017. Hilpert, an operator-turned-investor based in Berlin, uses this deck to bridge the information gap between founders and the angel community. For a fundraising analyst, this deck is a time capsule of European venture standards and a masterclass in how investors categorize risk, traction, and value-add.

Slide 1: Title Slide

The deck opens with a high-resolution night shot of Berlin, establishing the presenter's home base. It clearly states the topic: "European Angel Investor Landscape," the presenter: "Matthias Hilpert," and the venue: "PODIM Ljubljana 2017." This sets a professional, geographic, and temporal context for the data that follows.

Slide 2: Audience Engagement

Slide 2 is a simple prompt: "Show your hand if you... are an entrepreneur? have raised love money? have raised angel money? have raised VC money?" This slide serves to segment the audience and tailor the subsequent delivery, a common tactic in educational presentations to ensure the content resonates with the specific experience levels in the room.

Slide 3: The Presenter's Pedigree

Hilpert establishes his credibility on Slide 3. He describes himself as a "20 years Operator turned full time Investor." Key metrics include running a "EUR1bn P&L" at Vodafone and generating "EUR800mio enterprise value for Private Equity." His angel track record since 2008 includes 7 investments and 2 exits in the 18 months prior to the presentation. Logos for Vodafone, Orange, and Apax Partners establish his corporate background, while 3scale, Eurosender, and Massagio represent his venture portfolio. He specifies his focus: "Seed Stage subscriptions and market places from EUR10K monthly revenue."

Slide 4: The Importance of Angels

This slide features a quote from Paul Graham, founder of Y Combinator: "Angel investors are the most critical." By citing a high-profile figure from the US ecosystem, Hilpert validates the importance of the angel asset class before diving into the European specifics.

Slide 5: The Angel Value Proposition

Slide 5 answers "What can Angels offer?" with five bullet points: Operating and investment expertise, investing own money, capability to tolerate high risk, personal and emotional bond, and the likelihood to take an "entrepreneur's perspective." A word cloud on the right reinforces themes of success, capital, and mentorship. This slide is crucial for founders to understand that angel capital is often "smarter" and more flexible than institutional capital.

Slide 6: The Funding Roadmap

This is arguably the most valuable slide in the deck. It provides a matrix comparing Pre-Seed, Seed 1, Seed 2, and Series A stages across several metrics. For Seed 1 (highlighted in a red oval), the benchmarks are: Early PMF, EUR 5-10K monthly revenue, EUR 200K-500K funding, and EUR 1-2mio valuations. It notes that investors at this stage are Angels and VCs with less than EUR 50mio under management, seeking a 30x potential return. The slide includes a disclaimer that these numbers are Berlin-centric and may vary by city.

Slide 7: Geographic Distribution

Slide 7 visualizes the density of European angels using Angel.co data. London is the clear outlier with 2,125 active angels. Paris (420) and Berlin (383) follow. Interestingly, the slide also tracks "Angels per '000 people," where Helsinki (0.54) and Zurich (0.34) show higher relative density than London (0.25). A quote from Sebastian Siemiatkowski of Klarna emphasizes the shift in mentality toward entrepreneurship in Europe.

Slide 8: Angel Due Diligence for Founders

Hilpert flips the script on Slide 8, advising founders on "What to look for in an Angel?" Criteria include personal chemistry, number of deals in the last 12 months, percentage of time spent on angel investing, and specific industry/seniority experience. This encourages founders to treat fundraising as a two-way selection process.

Slide 9: The Four Angel Personas

Slide 9 breaks down "Typical Angel profiles." C-Level Corporate Execs are 40+ years old, focus on industry networks, and spend less than 10% of their time on deals. Exited Digital Founders have strong startup experience and spend less than 20% of their time investing. Professional Angels are the most active, with 10+ deals and over 50% of their time dedicated to investing. Finally, First-timers are described as a "last resort" with potential for "wrong expectations" or "non-standard terms."

Slide 10: The Power of References

A quote from Christoph Janz of Point Nine Capital: "...in God we trust, all others bring references!" This slide underscores the importance of social proof and due diligence in the tight-knit European tech community.

Slide 11: Sourcing Angels

Slide 11 provides a tactical list of where to find investors. It prioritizes local connections and referrals from other startup teams or successful management teams. It also lists specific German/Berlin accelerators and networks like B-to-V, BAND, and EIF, alongside digital directories like LinkedIn and Dealroom.

Slide 12: The Value-Add Checklist

This slide lists questions an angel should be able to help a founder answer. Topics range from product strategy ("pain killer or a nice to have?") and customer segmentation to technical architecture and fundraising strategy ("How much money should I raise from whom?"). This slide serves as a benchmark for what "good" angel support looks like.

Slide 13: Case Study - Massagio

Slide 13 provides a "reality check" using Massagio. It details a Seed 1 investment: Intro via Axel Springer PnP, 3 meetings, a EUR 25K convertible note, and money in the account within 7 weeks. The slide also lists the operational support provided, including customer interviews and sales process recruitment. This level of detail is rare and highly useful for setting founder expectations.

Slide 14: Case Study - Eurosender

The second case study, Eurosender, describes a Seed 2 stage investment. The intro came via Startupbootcamp, involving 2 meetings and a EUR 50K equity investment. The timeline was longer, with money arriving in 12 weeks. Support focused on financial modeling, hiring a Head of Finance, and technology roadmapping.

Slide 15: Q&A

A standard placeholder slide for audience questions: "What are your questions?"

Slide 16: Closing

The deck concludes with the same Berlin skyline image and a call to action: "Come and visit Berlin! Thanks!"

What Works Well in This Deck

The deck excels at quantifying the qualitative . By providing specific revenue and valuation ranges (Slide 6), it removes the ambiguity that often plagues early-stage fundraising. The categorization of angel profiles (Slide 9) is another highlight, as it helps founders understand the motivations and limitations of their potential backers. Furthermore, the inclusion of real-world case studies (Slides 13-14) with specific dollar amounts and timelines provides a level of transparency that is often missing from ecosystem overviews.

What is Missing

While the deck is comprehensive for its purpose, it lacks long-term exit data for the broader European landscape beyond the presenter's personal portfolio. It also omits the legal complexities of cross-border investing in Europe, which is a significant hurdle for founders in smaller markets like Ljubljana trying to attract Berlin or London capital. Additionally, there is no mention of syndicate structures or how angel groups (as opposed to individuals) operate, which was a growing trend even in 2017.

Founder's Playbook: What to Copy

Founders should emulate the clarity of the traction matrix on Slide 6 when preparing their own "Why Now" or "Market Opportunity" slides. Being able to point to industry-standard benchmarks for your stage demonstrates a high level of market awareness. Additionally, the operational support list on Slide 13 is a great template for founders to use when asking investors for specific help; instead of asking for "general advice," founders should ask for help with "segmentation & messaging" or "recruitment of Head of Finance." Finally, the geographic density analysis on Slide 7 is a reminder to founders to look at "Angels per capita" rather than just total numbers, as smaller, denser hubs like Helsinki may offer less competition for an investor's attention than London.

Frequently asked questions

What revenue benchmarks does the deck suggest for Seed rounds?
According to Slide 6, a 'Seed 1' company should have monthly revenue between EUR 5K and 10K. By the 'Seed 2' stage, this expectation rises to EUR 50K per month, coinciding with 'Established PMF.' These figures are based on the Berlin market in 2017 and serve as a baseline for founders to measure their traction against investor expectations.
How does the deck differentiate between types of angel investors?
Slide 9 categorizes angels into four groups: C-Level Corporate Execs (focus on industry network), Exited Digital Founders (strong startup experience), Professional Angels (10+ deals, high time commitment), and First-timers. The deck warns that First-timers might have 'wrong expectations' or 'non-standard terms,' suggesting founders prioritize experienced operators or professional angels for smoother scaling.
What is the typical timeline for an angel investment according to this deck?
The case studies on Slides 13 and 14 provide specific timelines. For Massagio, due diligence took 6 weeks, and money was in the account after 7 weeks. For Eurosender, due diligence also took 6 weeks, but the funding took 12 weeks to arrive. This suggests founders should plan for a 2-to-3-month window from initial due diligence to liquidity.
Where are the best places to find European angel investors?
Slide 11 recommends starting locally or within one's own country. Key sources include referrals from other startup teams, management teams with successful exits, and first-tier accelerators such as Techstars, Axel Springer Plug & Play, or Microsoft. Digital directories like Angel.co, LinkedIn, and Dealroom are also listed as secondary search tools.
What valuations were typical for European startups in 2017?
Slide 6 outlines valuation ranges by stage: Pre-Seed (EUR 0.5-1mio), Seed 1 (EUR 1-2mio), Seed 2 (EUR 2-5mio), and Series A (greater than EUR 10mio). The slide notes that these numbers are specific to Berlin and might be smaller in Ljubljana or larger in London, reflecting the regional variance in European capital density.

European Angel Landscape (Matthias Hilpert) pitch deck: the facts

Company
European Angel Landscape (Matthias Hilpert)
Year
2017
Stage
Seed
Slides
16
Sector
Venture Capital / Ecosystem Overview
Deck type
Ecosystem Overview / Educational
Outcome
N/A (Presentation)
Headquarters
Berlin, Germany

European Angel Landscape (Matthias Hilpert) pitch deck PDF

The full European Angel Landscape (Matthias Hilpert) deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

Related fundraising guides (24)

Decks from the same year (1)

Decks from the same region (1)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database