The 'Raising Seed Capital' deck by Steve Schlafman (RRE Ventures) is an educational resource designed for a General Assembly class, rather than a startup's pitch for capital. Spanning 81 slides (21 analyzed here), it defines the seed stage as rounds ranging from $20K to $1.5M+ (Slide 8) and highlights that the path to exit typically exceeds six years (Slide 12). The deck emphasizes the importance of process, recommending CRM tools like Streak to track investor interactions (Slide 40) and advising founders to build advisory boards featuring successful executives and industry experts (Slide 36)…
Key takeaways
- Seed stage is defined as the 'setup' round involving angels ($25K-$250K), accelerators ($20K-$150K), or institutional seed ($500K-$1.5M+) (Slide 8).
- The average timeframe for a venture-backed exit via M&A or IPO is consistently over six years (Slide 12).
- Fundraising is a full-time commitment that often halts creative and technical progress until the round is wrapped (Slide 16).
- Founders should structure their fundraising like a sales process using a spreadsheet or CRM to track stages from 'Target' to 'Commit' (Slide 40).
- A standard pitch deck must include six core pillars: Monetization, Roadmap/Timeline, Traction/Milestones, Projections/Metrics, Team/Advisors, and Funding (Slide 48).
- The primary psychological objective of a fundraise is to create FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) to drive investor demand and scarcity (Slide 52).
- Convertible debt is highlighted as a preferred seed instrument due to its speed, lower legal costs, and the ability to delay valuation discussions (Slide 68).
- Active engagement with VCs on Twitter is recommended as a way to share ideas openly and build rapport before a formal pitch (Slide 76).
Introduction and Context
The presentation titled "Raising Seed Capital" by Steve Schlafman, then a Principal at RRE Ventures, is not a pitch deck for a specific startup but rather an educational guide for founders. Dated February 3, 2014, the deck was originally used for a class taught at General Assembly. It serves as a strategic overview of the venture capital landscape, offering a look into how VCs evaluate early-stage companies and how founders should organize their efforts to secure funding.
Slides 1-8: Defining the Seed Stage
The deck opens with a clear disclaimer on Slide 4, noting that the guide is not definitive and that founders should consult lawyers. This sets a professional, advisory tone. Slide 8 provides a crucial taxonomy of the early-stage market. It defines the "Seed" as the setup round where a venture approaches angels or VCs for their product or idea. It breaks down the "In Scope" funding amounts: Angels provide $25K-$250K, Accelerators provide $20K-$150K, and Institutional Seed rounds range from $500K to $1.5M+. Notably, it marks Series A ($2.5M-$10M+) as "Out of Scope," establishing a clear boundary for the intended audience.
Slides 12-20: Market Realities and Trends
Slide 12 uses data from CB Insights to manage founder expectations regarding exits. The chart shows that both M&A and IPO exits consistently take more than six years, with IPOs trending toward 80-90 months. This slide serves to filter for founders committed to long-term company building. Slide 16 features Jake Lodwick (Elepath), who warns that fundraising is an all-consuming task. He states that founders should not expect to accomplish much "creatively or technically" until the raise is finished. Slide 20 reinforces the stability of the seed market, showing a steady climb in dollars invested from Q1 2010 ($57M) to a peak in Q3 2013 ($257M), suggesting a healthy, active ecosystem for new startups.
Slides 24-36: Sources and Preparation
Slide 24 introduces the "Sources of Seed Capital," leading into Slide 28, which is a logo cloud of "Notable Seed Funds." This slide lists heavyweights such as 500 Startups, First Round Capital, SV Angel, Lerer Ventures, and Founder Collective. It notes that these funds typically invest $50K-$750K and often act as a syndicate. Slide 32 transitions into the "How to Prepare" section. Slide 36 emphasizes the importance of an advisory board. It suggests seeking advice from a diverse group: Founders (illustrated by Jack Dorsey), Successful Execs (Marc Benioff), Investors (Naval Ravikant), Professors, Industry Experts, and Influencers (Guy Kawasaki). The message is clear: fundraising is not a solo sport; it requires a network of credibility.
Slides 40-48: The Fundraising Process and Deck Construction
Slide 40 is perhaps the most tactical in the deck. It provides a template for structuring the fundraising process. The example spreadsheet tracks firms like A16Z, NextView, and Floodgate. It includes granular details such as the "Referral" source (e.g., Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg) and the current "Stage" of the conversation. This slide teaches founders to treat VCs like a sales pipeline. Slide 44 features Tiny Sharkey (Sherpa Foundry) discussing the importance of narrative, urging founders to unlock the "true story" behind their product. Slide 48 then provides a visual checklist for the pitch deck itself. It highlights six essential slides: Monetization (Revenue Model), Roadmap/Timeline (Product Roadmap), Traction/Milestones (User growth), Projections/Metrics (Key milestones to Series A), Team/Advisors, and Funding (Seed Budget). The Seed Budget example shows a $1.2 million ask for a 12-month runway.
Slides 52-60: Investor Psychology and Interaction
Slide 52 introduces the concept of FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) as a primary objective. Using imagery from Willy Wonka, it explains that the founder's goal is to create excitement, demand, and scarcity, noting that "investors often move in packs." Slide 56 balances this by advocating for honesty. David Eisenberg (Floored) is quoted saying that investors would rather back an entrepreneur who knows their flaws and has a hypothesis for overcoming them. Slide 60 provides a list of ten critical questions founders should ask VCs, including "Do you lead and/or follow?", "What's your typical check size?", and "How does your firm think about follow-on investments?" This empowers the founder to vet the investor just as they are being vetted.
Slides 64-80: Post-Pitch and Closing
Slide 64 outlines "Action Items" following a pitch: debriefing with the team, sending thank-you notes (illustrated by a handwritten note), reviewing pitch notes, and updating the CRM. Slide 68 provides a technical breakdown of Convertible Debt. It defines key terms like Discount, Valuation Cap, and Conversion, and explains why it is used: speed, lower cost, founder control, and delayed valuation. Slide 72 features Ben Kaufman (Quirky) with a blunt reminder: "You should be really fucking uncomfortable if the money you've raised overshadows the work you've done." This serves as a final warning against the vanity of fundraising. Slide 76 lists active "Investors on Twitter," including Marc Andreessen, Chris Sacca, and Naval Ravikant, encouraging founders to engage with the community online. The deck concludes on Slide 80 with a simple "Good Luck!"
What Works Well in This Deck
The deck excels at demystifying the venture capital process. By using real-world examples of CRM structures (Slide 40) and specific investor questions (Slide 60), it provides actionable utility rather than vague theory. The inclusion of quotes from active founders and investors (Slides 16, 44, 56, 72) adds a layer of peer-to-peer credibility that is often missing from institutional guides. Furthermore, the clear definition of "Seed" vs. "Series A" (Slide 8) prevents founders from wasting time on the wrong stage of capital.
What Is Missing
As this is a general guide, it lacks specific unit economics or case studies of successful vs. failed pitches. While it lists what slides should be in a deck (Slide 48), it does not provide a deep dive into how to calculate a "Seed Budget" or how to determine an appropriate valuation cap for convertible debt. Additionally, the deck is from 2014; while the core principles remain valid, the specific dollar amounts for seed rounds have shifted significantly upward in the decade since its publication.
What a Founder Should Copy
Founders should immediately adopt the CRM approach shown on Slide 40. Tracking the "Referral" and "Next Steps" for every VC interaction is the difference between a chaotic fundraise and a successful one. The list of questions to ask investors (Slide 60) is also a must-copy; it changes the power dynamic of the meeting and ensures the founder is finding a true partner. Finally, the emphasis on building an advisory board (Slide 36) before starting the raise is a strategy that significantly increases a startup's perceived maturity and reduces the perceived risk for early investors.
Frequently asked questions
- How does this deck define the different tiers of seed funding?
- Slide 8 categorizes seed funding into three distinct buckets: Angel rounds ($25K to $250K), Accelerators ($20K to $150K), and Institutional Seed ($500K to $1.5M+). It explicitly places Series A and beyond ($2.5M to $10M+) as 'Out of Scope' for this specific guide, emphasizing that seed is the foundational 'setup' for a venture.
- What specific advice is given regarding the fundraising process management?
- Slide 40 advocates for a highly structured approach. It suggests using a CRM like Streak or a detailed spreadsheet to track every interaction. The example provided includes columns for 'Weight (1-5)', 'Stage' (e.g., Target, Intro'd, 1st Pitch, Diligence, Decision, Commit), 'Strategy', 'Referral', and 'Next Steps'. This treats fundraising as a disciplined sales funnel.
- What are the recommended components of a seed-stage pitch deck?
- According to Slide 48, a complete deck should feature slides for Revenue Model (Monetization), Product Roadmap (Timeline), Traction (Milestones), Key Milestones to Series A (Projections/Metrics), Team and Advisors, and a Seed Budget (Funding). The slide uses blue banners to emphasize these as the non-negotiable building blocks of the narrative.
- How should founders handle their business flaws during a pitch?
- Slide 56 features a quote from David Eisenberg (Floored) advising founders not to hide flaws. It suggests that investors prefer honesty and want to back entrepreneurs who recognize their challenges and have reasonable hypotheses on how to overcome them using the resources and time provided by the new capital.
- What are the key advantages of using convertible debt for a seed round?
- Slide 68 lists four main benefits: Speed (closing within weeks due to simpler paperwork), Cost (cheaper legal fees than equity), Control (founders retain majority voting stock), and Valuation (it allows the company to delay the valuation conversation unless the note is capped). It defines the instrument as a loan intended to convert to equity later.