JP Morgan × Frank Acquisition Pitch Deck (2021) Breakdown

The Frank acquisition deck is a masterclass in presenting a 'distribution-first' thesis to a legacy financial institution. The deck centers on a single, massive figure: 4.25 million students. By positioning this user base as a low-cost acquisition engine for high-value financial products, Frank successfully pitched itself as a strategic shortcut for JP Morgan to capture the Gen Z market. However, the simplicity of the deck—omitting team backgrounds, detailed unit economics, and technical infrastructure—served to keep the focus entirely on the scale of the data. Following the $175M acquisition…

Key takeaways

• The deck leans heavily on a total user count of 4.25 million students to justify its strategic value (Slide 1).
• Frank claimed a significant reduction in marketing spend, dropping from $1.3mm per year to less than $50k per year while increasing new users (Slide 2).
• The core value proposition was an acquisition cost of under $5 per student, specifically targeting the FAFSA application process (Slide 1).
• The startup positioned itself as a 'centralized suite' that handles KYC and onboarding in one click after a FAFSA filing (Slide 1).
• Frank listed an enterprise customer pipeline including 800+ colleges and 30 Fortune 500 employers (Slide 4).
• The deck uses a comparison to Apple's payment business to argue that distribution is more valuable than the underlying financial processing (Slide 5).
• There is a complete absence of a team slide, financial projections, or a breakdown of active vs. registered users.
• The product claims to allow students to apply for financial aid in under 7 minutes (Slide 7).

Frequently asked questions

What was the primary metric Frank used to sell to JP Morgan?

The primary metric was a user base of 4.25 million students. Frank repeated this number across almost every slide (Slides 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7). They framed this not just as a list, but as a 'trusted' relationship that allowed them to acquire new students for under $5 each, a figure significantly lower than typical fintech customer acquisition costs.

How did Frank justify its strategic value to a large bank?

Frank used a 'Distribution is Power' thesis. On Slide 5, they argued that their value came from being an 'Acquisition Machine' with data that would take a company hundreds of millions of dollars and many years to replicate. They explicitly stated that adding more financial products now had 'minimal execution risk' because the distribution channel was already built.

What specific products did Frank claim to offer students?

According to Slide 1, the product suite spanned the entire student lifecycle. Pre-college offerings included financial literacy and college search. During college, they offered FAFSA aid, scholarships, a 'Classfinder,' and Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) services. Post-college, they planned to cross-sell student loan repayment, credit cards, and investment accounts.

What did the deck claim about marketing efficiency?

Slide 2 and Slide 3 focused on a dramatic increase in organic growth. They claimed that 96% of students found Frank through referrals and partners. The charts showed marketing spend plummeting from $1.3 million in 2017 to less than $50,000 in 2020, even as new user acquisition grew from 1.1 million to 1.4 million in the same period.

What major components were missing from this pitch deck?

The deck is notably brief at only 7 slides. It lacks a Team slide, which is standard for any startup pitch. It also lacks a Competition slide, a detailed Business Model slide (explaining how they actually make money beyond 'strategic value'), and any audited financial statements or revenue figures. The focus is almost exclusively on user growth and distribution.

JP Morgan × Frank Acquisition pitch deck: the facts

Company

JP Morgan × Frank Acquisition

Year

2021

Stage

Acquisition

Slides

7

Sector

FinTech

JP Morgan × Frank Acquisition pitch deck PDF

The full JP Morgan × Frank Acquisition deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Frank (student financial aid startup) / JPMorgan Chase acquisition pitch deck was used for

This deck was used by Frank, a student financial aid fintech startup, in connection with JPMorgan Chase’s 2021 acquisition of Frank for approximately $175 million. The slides position Frank as a centralized financial platform embedded across students’ pre‑college, college, and post‑college lives, highlighting a claimed user base of 4.25 million students and an acquisition engine for financial products. Subsequent litigation by JPMorgan, the SEC, and federal prosecutors alleged that the user numbers and related data metrics presented to JPMorgan during the deal process were fraudulently inflated and that the real user count was under 300,000. The deck is now viewed as a case study in due‑diligence failure and misrepresentation in fintech M&A, illustrating how contested growth and acquisition cost metrics were used to justify the purchase price.

Business model: Frank operated a student financial aid platform marketed as a tool to help students and parents simplify the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) process and access college financial aid.

Round

Acquisition / M&A transaction.

Year

2021

Lead investor

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Investors

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (acquirer).

Founders

Charlie Javice

Industry

Financial technology (student financial aid / fintech).

Raised: Approximately $175 million purchase price for the acquisition.

Use of funds as presented: Public reporting and complaints describe JPMorgan’s rationale as acquiring Frank’s student customer base and financial aid data to deepen its engagement with the college‑aged market, rather than providing growth capital to Frank; the $175M figure reflects the purchase price, not an operating raise.

What happened after the Frank (student financial aid startup) / JPMorgan Chase acquisition deck

Frank was acquired by JPMorgan Chase in 2021 for about $175 million based on representations that it had over 4 million student customers and a valuable data asset. Subsequent lawsuits and regulatory actions alleged that these metrics were fraudulently inflated, that Frank’s true user base was under 300,000, and that synthetic and purchased data had been used to support the acquisition pitch; the

• 2021: JPMorgan Chase acquired Frank for approximately $175 million, believing it was buying a business with over 4 milli
• December 2022: JPMorgan filed a lawsuit alleging that Frank’s founder misrepresented user numbers and fabricated custome
• April 2023: The SEC and federal prosecutors charged Frank’s founder with fraud related to the $175 million sale, allegin
• July 2023: The SEC charged Frank’s former Chief Growth Officer with fraud in connection with the sale to JPMorgan.
• By 2023: Frank became defunct and was described in press accounts as now shuttered, with JPMorgan’s CEO calling the acqu

What the Frank (student financial aid startup) / JPMorgan Chase acquisition deck got right

• Compelling lifecycle narrative around student financial needs. The deck articulates a clear student‑centric product narrative, positioning Frank as a “constant presence in students’ lives” across pre‑college, college, and post‑college stages, which provides an intuitive framework for lifetime value and cross‑selling financial products.
• Centralized platform with integrated onboarding around FAFSA. Frank presents itself as a centralized suite of financial products where students can apply for aid and other offerings in one click after filing the FAFSA, suggesting streamlined KYC and onboarding that would be attractive to a large bank seeking efficient customer acquisition.
• Strategic focus on distribution, engagement, and data as value drivers. The deck’s "distribution is the power in fintech" thesis emphasizes a powerful acquisition machine, sticky engagement throughout the year, and meaningful data on students, all of which directly address the strategic priorities of an acquirer looking for scalable access to the college‑aged demographic.
• Strong (claimed) traction and scale in the student market. By highlighting 4.25 million students and growing and claiming millions of new students acquired annually, the deck presents a narrative of rapid traction and scale that, if accurate, would make Frank a significant asset for a bank aiming to expand its reach among younger customers.
• Promised data moat and longitudinal insights into student customers. The emphasis on year‑over‑year data about students’ financial journeys and needs positions Frank as a potential data moat, promising insights that could inform underwriting, product design, and targeted marketing for an acquirer’s broader retail banking portfolio.
• Perceived low‑risk expansion into additional financial products. The framing that adding more financial products has “minimal execution risk” because 4.25 million students already trust Frank suggests a ready‑made cross‑sell platform, aligning with a large bank’s desire to attach accounts, cards, and investment products to an existing audience.

What could have been stronger

• Headline user and acquisition metrics later alleged to be materially false. The deck’s centerpiece traction claim—that 4.25 million students “trust Frank for all their money needs” and that millions of students are acquired annually—was later alleged by JPMorgan, the SEC, and federal prosecutors to be inflated by synthetic datasets and purchased lists, with the true customer count under 300,000. This disconnect between headline growth metrics and verified user data represents a critical weakness in the deck’s credibility and in the underlying investment case.
• Heavy reliance on self‑reported distribution data without evident independent verification. While the deck emphasizes a powerful acquisition machine and low acquisition costs, public complaints and articles describe how JPMorgan relied heavily on Frank’s reported user numbers but later concluded it had bought a business with fewer than 300,000 customers instead of the advertised 4.25 million. The materials suggest there was insufficient independently audited or third‑party‑verified data presented alongside the growth narrative, exposing a gap in the robustness and verifiability of the distribution claims.
• Overextended product vision compared to documented core use case. The deck frames Frank as a “centralized suite of products” present across all stages of the student lifecycle, from college search to post‑college credit cards and investment accounts, but litigation and reporting focus almost entirely on Frank’s FAFSA simplification tool and email list rather than a proven multi‑product financial platform. The limited independently documented adoption of non‑FAFSA financial products makes the deck’s portrayal of broad, post‑college financial engagement appear overstated relative to evidence available after the acquisition.
• Data moat and insights narrative undermined by later allegations about data fabrication. The deck asserts that Frank knows more about its students than lenders, colleges, or employers and highlights "meaningful data" as a key strategic asset. Subsequent SEC and DOJ filings allege that some of the data presented to JPMorgan was artificially created or purchased to inflate the apparent customer base, undermining the trustworthiness of the claimed data moat and raising concerns about data provenance and compliance.
• Unproven lifetime engagement and post‑graduation stickiness. Although the deck sells Frank as a constant presence even “post‑grad,” later descriptions of the business by JPMorgan and regulators focus on Frank’s role as an acquisition channel for student email addresses and FAFSA assistance rather than a full‑stack post‑college financial relationship. This suggests that the deck’s promise of long‑term lifetime value and stickiness may not have been supported by evidence of sustained post‑graduation product adoption.

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

• Assess the reliability of Frank’s reported user numbers and engagement metrics, especially the 4.25 million students figure and claims of millions of new students acquired annually, in light of later findings that the actual user base was under 300,000.
• Understand how Frank’s FAFSA‑centric product translated into durable financial relationships across bank accounts, credit cards, and investment accounts, given that public accounts after the deal emphasize the email list and FAFSA tool more than multi‑product adoption.
• Evaluate the quality, provenance, and compliance of Frank’s student data—particularly lists used to claim millions of FAFSA starters and completers—since regulators allege that synthetic and purchased data were used to support the acquisition narrative.
• Examine JPMorgan’s internal due‑diligence process for validating growth and acquisition cost claims in the deck, as the bank later described the acquisition as a “huge mistake” and sued over alleged misrepresentations.

Risks that stand out

• Risk of materially inaccurate user metrics: Regulators and JPMorgan allege that Frank’s claim of 4.25 million students was inflated using synthetic and purchased data, with the true number under 300,000, exposing investors to severe mispricing and potential fraud.
• Concentration risk around a single core use case: Evidence after the acquisition centers on Frank’s FAFSA simplification tool and email list, suggesting that the broader multi‑product, post‑grad financial platform promised in the deck may not have been fully realized at scale.
• Regulatory and legal exposure: The SEC and DOJ charged Frank’s founder and a senior executive with fraud related to the sale, and JPMorgan pursued civil litigation, indicating high legal, reputational, and compliance risk when growth narratives depend on unverified datasets.
• Due‑diligence process risk: JPMorgan’s characterization of the deal as a "huge mistake" and its subsequent lawsuits underscore how insufficient validation of core metrics in a deck can lead to significant losses and post‑deal enforcement actions.

Questions this deck invites

• What independent evidence (e.g., verified logs, third‑party analytics, or audited datasets) supported Frank’s claim of 4.25 million students and millions of annual acquisitions, beyond the internally produced materials presented in the deck
• How were Frank’s customer records generated, stored, and validated, and what controls were in place to prevent the use of synthetic or commercially purchased data to represent platform users, as later alleged in SEC and DOJ filings?
• What percentage of Frank’s supposed user base had meaningfully engaged with non‑FAFSA financial products (such as bank accounts, credit cards, or investment accounts), and how did that compare to the "centralized suite of products" and post
• How did Frank measure and substantiate its "acquisition machine" and low acquisition costs, and were these metrics consistent across internal financials, user‑level data, and external channel performance reports presented during the acquisi
• What specific due‑diligence steps did JPMorgan and advisers perform to reconcile Frank’s reported user numbers and data assets with external benchmarks or direct data sampling, and where did those processes fail to detect discrepancies now

What founders can take from the Frank (student financial aid startup) / JPMorgan Chase acquisition deck

• Headline user metrics in a pitch deck—such as Frank’s claim of 4.25 million students—must be backed by independently verifiable data, because investors and acquirers may later challenge those numbers and regulatory bodies can treat unsupported inflation as securities fraud.
• A compelling distribution thesis (“distribution is the power in fintech”) is not enough without rigorous proof of engagement quality and customer authenticity; synthetic or purchased lists used to simulate traction can lead to catastrophic outcomes.
• Positioning a product as a lifelong financial platform across pre‑college, college, and post‑college stages requires demonstrable adoption across multiple products, not just a single high‑touch use case like FAFSA assistance.
• Acquirers should treat due diligence on data provenance, user counts, and acquisition costs as a core risk‑management function; JPMorgan’s experience with Frank shows that relying heavily on self‑reported growth metrics can result in expensive, public disputes and enforcement actions.
• Founders and executives must recognize that representations made in fundraising and M&A decks can become central evidence in later civil and criminal proceedings; misstatements about success, size, and market penetration were explicitly cited in complaints against Frank’s leadership.
• Fintech companies built around student financial data face heightened scrutiny on compliance and truthfulness, and building a durable business requires transparent data practices rather than aggressive metric inflation or opaque sourcing.

Frank (student financial aid startup) / JPMorgan Chase acquisition pitch deck: common questions

What did Frank, the startup acquired by JPMorgan, actually do?

Frank was a financial technology startup that built an online platform to help students and parents simplify and complete the FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) and navigate college financial aid. It marketed itself as a constant presence in students’ financial lives, from pre‑college through post‑graduation, with additional products like scholarships, bank accounts, credit cards, and loan repayment tools layered on top of the core FAFSA service.

What was the JPMorgan × Frank acquisition and how large was the deal?

In 2021, JPMorgan Chase acquired Frank for about $175 million. According to JPMorgan’s subsequent lawsuit and regulatory complaints, the bank was told that Frank had 4.25 million student customers and highly valuable user data, which were key justifications for the acquisition price. Later investigations alleged that these user numbers were dramatically inflated and that the real customer count was closer to 250,000–300,000.

What are the main claims in the JPMorgan × Frank acquisition pitch deck?

The deck claims that Frank has 4.25 million students and growing, that it acquires “millions of new students annually” at low cost, and that it is a centralized suite where students apply for aid and financial products in one click after filing the FAFSA. It also presents a thesis that “distribution is the power in fintech,” arguing that Frank has a powerful acquisition machine, sticky engagement, and meaningful year‑over‑year data, which together allegedly make adding more financial products low‑risk and inexpensive.

Why is this acquisition considered a due‑diligence failure and what happened afterward?

After the acquisition, JPMorgan sued Frank’s founder Charlie Javice, alleging she fabricated or purchased lists of millions of fake customers and misrepresented the size of Frank’s user base to induce the bank to pay $175 million. The SEC and federal prosecutors later filed fraud charges, asserting that Frank claimed 4.25 million users when the actual number was under 300,000. The case has been described as a major due‑diligence failure and a cautionary tale about reliance on unverified growth metrics in fintech M&A.

Which specific metrics in the Frank pitch to JPMorgan were later challenged or contested?

Public litigation materials and press reports indicate that the contested metrics included Frank’s claimed 4.25 million users, lists of millions of students supposedly completing or starting FAFSA applications through Frank, and representations about the depth of its engagement with college‑aged customers. JPMorgan’s complaints and regulatory filings allege that those metrics were artificially inflated using synthetic data and commercially purchased student lists, and that Frank’s true customer base was under 300,000.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

• SEC Charges Founder of Frank with Fraud in Connection with $175...
• DOJ, SEC charge Frank founder with fraud | Banking Dive
• Javice et al. - SEC.gov
• JPMorgan Claims It Was Tricked by Startup Founder Who Falsified Millions of Users
• How Charlie Javice's Frank Sale to JP Morgan Wound up...
• Frank student loans founder charged over US$175 million fraud
• Startup founder Charlie Javice pleads not guilty to charges of defrauding JPMorgan By Reuters
• Frank founder accused of fraud by JPMorgan was referred to by employee in Slack message as the ‘king of finding magic numbers’ according to

JP Morgan × Frank Acquisition pitch deck slides

What each slide of the JP Morgan × Frank Acquisition pitch deck says

Slide 1

The Frank Solution As a constant presence in Students' lives, even post-grad, Frank can create real value by simplifying the financial world for Students 4.25mm Frank Students & Growing The Frank Opportunity: Millions of New Students Acquired Annually at Under ———————————— e ————— Pre-College College Post-College Financial Literacy ) FAFSA®/ Aid Student Loan Repayment FAFSA® / Aid Sgl';ol:firships Credit Cards / ssfinder Scholarshi Bank Accounts o Buy Now, Pay Later Investment Accounts College Search Work Study Y, Frank is a centralized suite of products where students can apply for aid and other financial products in one click after they file a FAFSA® for seamiess KYC and onboarding ERANK

Slide 2

4.25 Million Students Trust Frank 96% of Students now find Frank through friend referrals, partners, and our Student financial literacy resource on how to pay for college* Users in millions Frank Growth since April 2017 Launch 45 43 40 3s 30 29 25 20 18 15 11 1.1 11 3% 10 06 0s 00 2017 2018 2019 2020 — Cumulative Users New Users =——=New Organic Users = Marketing Spend From spending $1.3mm per year in marketing to less than $50k per year F est FRANK. 1

Slide 3

Growth vs. Spend 16 14 14 12 11 1.1 1.0 08 0.6 06 04 : mE BR 0.0 2017 2018 2019 2020 mmm New Users Marketing Spend

Slide 4

FRANK. Content & College Courses Technology Data = Px 4.25mm 3 Financial 800+ 2+ Local 30 Fortune 500 Students Institutions Colleges Govemments Employers

Slide 5

Frank Thesis: Distribution is the Power in Fintech Frank's Strategic Value is Derived from: * Acquisition Machine: We have a powerful distribution channel and relationships with Students that would take a company hundreds of millions of dollars and many years to replicate = Better Engagement & Retention: Our products & services are sticky and run throughout the year * Meaningful Data: We know more about our Students than any lender, college, or employer year over year 4.25 million Students trust Frank for all their money needs - adding more financial products now has minimal execution risk and is much less expensive

Slide 6

1 h 1.4mm New Students in 2020 a Premier brand in college affordability

Slide text above is read directly from the JP Morgan × Frank Acquisition deck PDF embedded on this page.

Related fundraising guides (24)

• How to Create a Pitch Deck That Gets Funded
• Revolut Pitch Deck Breakdown
• The Seed Pitch Deck: A Tactical Guide to Raising Capital
• Pitch Deck Financials: A Founder's Guide to Building Forecasts that Win Deals
• SWOT Analysis for Fundraising: A Founder's Guide to Pitching Investors
• The Structure of a Pitch Deck: A Founder's Slide-by-Slide Guide
• How to Bounce Back From a Pitch Meltdown
• How to Create a Pitch Deck Solution Slide That Gets Funded
• How to Pitch Investors: A Founder's Guide to Raising Seed Funding
• How to Present Your Business Strategy in a Pitch Deck
• How to Create a Pitch Deck in Google Slides That Actually Gets Funded
• A Founder's Guide to Pitch Deck Flow That Closes Rounds
• LinkedIn 2004 Pitch Deck Breakdown: How Networks Became the Next Big Thing
• Cash vs. Profit: A Founder's Guide to Startup Financials
• How to Frame Competition in Your Pitch Deck
• How To Design A Pitch Deck Cover Slide That Gets You The Meeting
• Square Pitch Deck Breakdown
• The Best Books on Pitch Decks: A Founder's Guide
• How to Build Pitch Deck Financials That Get You Funded
• A Founder's Guide to Testing Your Pitch Deck and Diagnosing Why Investors Pass
• Coinbase 2012 Pitch Deck Breakdown: A Masterclass in Simplicity
• Pitch Deck Design: A Founder's Guide to Balancing Text and Visuals
• The Team Slide: A Founder's Guide to Acing Your Seed Round Pitch
• How to Pitch a Hardware Startup and Get Funded

This deck's categories (5)

• Fintech & Neobank Pitch Deck Examples
• Consumer & Social Pitch Deck Examples
• Hardware, Deeptech & Climate Pitch Deck Examples
• Edtech & Learning Pitch Deck Examples
• Series A & Series B Pitch Deck Examples

Decks from the same year (1)

• 2021 pitch deck examples

Decks with a similar raise (1)

• Pitch decks that raised $50M to $250M

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

• Pitch decks from companies starting with J

Decks in the same category (12)

• TransferWise (Wise) Pitch Deck Breakdown
• Oscar Health Pitch Deck Breakdown
• Revolut Pitch Deck Breakdown
• Dwolla Pitch Deck Breakdown
• Brex Pitch Deck Breakdown
• Mint.com 2007 Seed Pitch Deck Breakdown
• Super.com Pitch Deck Breakdown: The $60M Series C Deck, Slide by Slide
• Exeq Pitch Deck Breakdown: The 2017 Consumer Fintech Deck That Left Its Business Model in Another File
• Square Pitch Deck Breakdown
• Stripe Early Pitch Deck Breakdown
• BakeSale Pitch Deck Breakdown: The 24-Slide Product Deck That Demos a Product and Never Pitches a Business
• Monzo Pitch Deck Breakdown: Building the Bank of the Future

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

• Jolt Pitch Deck Teardown: Disrupting Green Hydrogen with Solution Combustion Electrodes
• Jomla Pitch Deck Teardown: A Hyper-Local Malaysian Gig Economy Play for Students
• Jonga Pitch Deck Teardown: Solving Low-Income Home Security with LoRa Infrastructure
• Joonko Pitch Deck Teardown: A $25M Series B Built on Automated DE&I Sourcing
• Lollipop Audio Pitch Deck Teardown: A Niche Workflow Play for Video Game Voice Recording
• JourneyPalette Pitch Deck Teardown: A Hyper-Local Travel Marketplace for the Kenyan Market
• JourneyPalette Pitch Deck Teardown: A Hyper-Local Play for Kenyan Sustainable Tourism
• Joyixir Pitch Deck Teardown: A Regional Gaming Studio Seeking Global Expansion
• JSEcoin Pitch Deck Teardown: A Browser-Based Cryptocurrency Monetization Play
• Jubilee Pitch Deck Teardown: Leveraging Media Distribution to Launch a Dating Platform
• Jude Pitch Deck Teardown: Targeting the £600bn Boomer Self-Care Market
• Judolaunch Pitch Deck Breakdown: A Visual Narrative of Amazon Marketplace Expansion
• Juego Studios Pitch Deck Breakdown: The 5-Slide NFT Game Deck That Shows the Work but Never Explains It
• Juked Pitch Deck Breakdown: Leveraging Twitch Pedigree to Solve Esports Fragmentation
• DoubleVerify Pitch Deck Teardown: Scaling Ad Integrity to $244M Revenue
• July Pitch Deck Teardown: A $2.3M Pre-Seed Case Study in Creator Economy Automation

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

• Meta Innovations Inc Pitch Deck Teardown: A Micro-Budget Approach to IoT Infrastructure
• MetaProps Pitch Deck Teardown: A Niche Marketplace for Digital Architecture NFTs
• mHealthPharma Pitch Deck Teardown: A Regulatory-First Approach to Digital Therapeutics
• Miel de Tierra Pitch Deck Teardown: Scaling a Multi-Regional Mezcal Brand via Distribution
• Cornel Properties Pitch Deck Teardown: A Boutique Hotel Fractional Ownership Play
• Mint House Pitch Deck Teardown: A Data-Heavy Approach to Tech-Enabled Hospitality
• Ministro Pitch Deck Teardown: A Pre-Seed Play for the ASEAN Job Market
• Mint.com Pre-Launch Pitch Deck Teardown: A Masterclass in Lead-Gen Monetization Strategy
• Mint Pitch Deck Teardown: How a $325K Seed Deck Articulated a $170M Exit Strategy
• Miso Media Pitch Deck Teardown: A Deep Dive into the 'Kindle for Sheet Music'
• Mitten Jan Pitch Deck Teardown: A $300k Seed Play for Global Salon CRM Dominance
• Career PriAm Pitch Deck Teardown: Career Guidance for Indian Students

Browse by topic (1)

• Pitch Deck guides

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database