How does Sharebee differentiate itself from traditional self-storage?

Sharebee positions itself as a peer-to-peer alternative that is 60% cheaper and more conveniently located than traditional facilities. The deck uses slides 5 through 7 to visually compare traditional storage to a prison-like environment, highlighting pain points such as high costs, hidden fees, and a lack of service, which Sharebee aims to solve through a digital-first, community-based model.

What specific traction did Sharebee show to investors?

The deck presents clear financial growth, showing booked sales increasing from CAD 100,000 in Q4 2018 to over CAD 300,000 by Q2 2019 (Slide 10). They also emphasize an 80% quarter-over-quarter growth rate (Slide 11) and conclude the deck by stating they have served over 1,000 customers (Slide 22).

What is the 'Online Photo Catalog' feature mentioned in the deck?

On slide 16, Sharebee showcases a digital interface where users can view photos of their stored items (e.g., sofas, coffee tables, TVs). This feature allows customers to manage their inventory remotely and request specific items for 'Deliver on-demand' service, bridging the gap between physical storage and digital convenience.

Who are the founders and what is their background?

The company was led by Co-founder and CEO Maxime Villemure and Co-founder and CTO Adlene Barouche. Slide 18 highlights their backgrounds, including education at McGill University and professional experience at high-profile firms such as JPMorgan Chase, Sony, and Twitter, providing the team with significant technical and business credibility.

What are the major omissions in the Sharebee pitch deck?

The deck is notably missing a 'Use of Funds' or 'The Ask' slide, which typically details how much capital is being raised and where it will be spent. Additionally, there is no mention of unit economics (CAC/LTV), a competitive landscape analysis, or a detailed roadmap for future expansion beyond the current Canadian and US market figures.

Sharebee Pitch Deck: All 22 Slides + Teardown

See all 22 slides of the Sharebee pitch deck — a 2016 Seed deck — with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

Sharebee’s 2016 seed deck is a study in minimalist storytelling. Spanning 22 slides, the presentation relies heavily on full-bleed imagery to establish the emotional pain of cluttered living and the clinical, 'expensive' nature of traditional self-storage. The deck transitions from these pain points into a clean product walkthrough and impressive traction metrics, specifically an 80% quarter-over-quarter growth rate. While the deck lacks a formal 'Ask' slide or detailed unit economics, it successfully anchors the investment opportunity in a massive $100B Total Addressable Market (TAM). The fo…

Key takeaways

The deck highlights a massive 1000% increase in consumer goods over the last three decades on slide 3.
Market demand is validated by the fact that 15,000,000 households pay for storage monthly, as shown on slide 4.
Traditional storage is framed as 'Expensive,' 'Inconveniently Located,' and full of 'Hidden fees' on slide 7.
Traction is demonstrated through a bar chart showing booked sales growing from CAD 100,000 in Q4 2018 to over CAD 300,000 in Q2 2019 on slide 10.
The company claims a consistent 80% Quarter-over-Quarter (QoQ) growth rate on slide 11.
The product includes an 'Online Photo Catalog' for users to manage stored items remotely, illustrated on slide 16.
The Total Addressable Market (TAM) is valued at $100B globally, with $40B in the US and $4B in Canada, according to slides 19-21.
The deck omits a specific funding ask, valuation, or breakdown of how the $525,600 raised would be allocated.

The Visual Narrative of Sharebee

Sharebee’s pitch deck is a departure from the text-heavy presentations common in the mid-2010s. Instead of leading with complex data, the founders chose to lead with a visceral emotional hook. The deck uses 22 slides to tell a story of consumerism, the resulting clutter, and the outdated solutions currently available to homeowners. By the time the investor reaches the financial data, the problem has been framed so clearly that the solution feels inevitable.

Slides 1-4: The Macro Problem

The deck opens with a simple title slide (Slide 1) featuring the logo and the tagline: Storage unit in your pocket . This immediately sets the stage for a mobile-first, tech-enabled solution to a physical problem. Slide 2 is a full-bleed image of an incredibly cluttered room, serving as a wordless 'Problem' slide. It requires no explanation; every viewer understands the stress of too much stuff.

Slide 3 provides the quantitative weight to the visual image, stating there has been a 1000% increase in consumer goods in the last 3 decades . This is followed by Slide 4, which defines the current market behavior: 15,000,000 Households pay for storage monthly . By starting with these macro trends, Sharebee establishes that they are not creating a new need, but rather capturing an existing, massive behavior.

Slides 5-7: The Villain Arc

Slides 5 and 6 use stark, almost depressing imagery of traditional self-storage facilities. Slide 5 shows two men walking down a sterile, blue-doored hallway, while Slide 6 shows a facility that looks indistinguishable from a prison block. This is a deliberate psychological tactic to make the current market leaders look like 'the old way'—cold, industrial, and uninviting.

Slide 7 explicitly lists the grievances against these traditional players: Expensive , Inconveniently Located , Hidden fees , and Lack of Service . By the end of this section, the investor is primed to want a 'hero' to disrupt this unpleasant status quo.

Slides 8-11: The Hero and the Proof

Slide 8 reintroduces the Sharebee logo, acting as a transition into the solution. Slide 9 provides social proof, showing five-star reviews from users like Parisa N. and Jean-François B. The slide claims 500+ 5 stars reviews across Facebook, Google, and Sharebee. This is a crucial inclusion for a peer-to-peer platform, where trust is the primary currency.

Traction is the focus of Slides 10 and 11. Slide 10 displays a bar chart of Booked Sales . The figures are exact: CAD 100,000.00 in Q4 2018 , rising to CAD 150,000.00 in Q1 2019 , and peaking at over CAD 300,000.00 in Q2 2019 . Slide 11 distills this into a single, powerful metric: 80% QoQ (Quarter-over-Quarter) growth. For a seed-stage company, this level of growth is the primary driver of investor interest.

Slides 12-16: Product Walkthrough

The deck then moves into a 'Day in the Life' of a user named Nicole. Slide 12 shows her selecting a storage plan on a laptop, with options ranging from 5'x5' (25 ft²) to 10'x20' (200 ft²) . Slide 13 shows the scheduling interface for pickup, and Slide 14 shows the booking confirmation and a referral prompt ( Get my first $50 ).

Slide 15 simplifies the entire value proposition into a three-step graphic: Free Pickup , Store in one of our secure locations , and Deliver on-demand . This highlights that Sharebee isn't just a marketplace for space; they are managing the logistics. Slide 16 introduces the Online Photo Catalog , showing a user's dashboard with photos of a Couch/Sofa (3-seat) , Coffee Table , and TV . This feature is the 'Storage unit in your pocket' promised on the first slide.

Slides 17-22: The Team and the Market

After a brief visual callback to the 'prison' storage imagery on Slide 17 (likely used as a 'Why now?' or 'The Alternative' reminder during a live pitch), Slide 18 introduces the founders. Maxime Villemure (CEO) is linked to McGill and Six Sigma , while Adlene Barouche (CTO) brings experience from JPMorgan Chase , Sony , and Twitter . This balances the CEO's business/process background with the CTO's high-scale tech pedigree.

The deck closes with a 'Market Size' crescendo. Slide 19 identifies a $4B market in Canada , Slide 20 identifies $40B in the US , and Slide 21 claims a $100B TAM (Total Addressable Market). The final slide (Slide 22) summarizes the three most important facts for an investor to remember: 80% QoQ Growth , $300K+ Sales Q2 2019 , and 1,000+ Customers Served .

What Works in the Sharebee Deck

The most successful element of this deck is its emotional anchoring . By using high-quality, evocative imagery of cluttered homes and prison-like storage units, the founders create a 'villain' out of the incumbent industry. This makes the Sharebee solution feel like a relief rather than just another app.

Furthermore, the traction data is unambiguous . Using 'Booked Sales' instead of vague 'Gross Merchandise Volume' (GMV) or 'User Signups' gives investors a clear picture of the company's ability to generate revenue. The 80% QoQ growth rate is a 'goldilocks' metric—high enough to be exciting, but grounded in the actual dollar figures shown on the previous slide.

Finally, the Product Walkthrough (Slides 12-16) is excellent. It doesn't just show screenshots; it tells a story of a user journey. The inclusion of the 'Online Photo Catalog' is a 'wow' feature that differentiates Sharebee from a simple Craigslist-style listing site.

What is Missing from the Sharebee Deck

Despite its visual strengths, the deck has several glaring omissions that would likely be addressed in a follow-up due diligence meeting. Most notably, there is no 'Ask' slide . The deck never specifies how much money they are looking for, what the valuation expectations are, or how the funds will be allocated. While the catalogue listing states they raised $525,600, that information is not present in the slides themselves.

There is also a complete lack of unit economics . For a marketplace business that includes 'Free Pickup' (Slide 15), investors need to know the Cost of Customer Acquisition (CAC) and the Lifetime Value (LTV). If the cost of the truck and movers for the 'Free Pickup' exceeds the first six months of storage fees, the business model may not be sustainable at scale. The deck ignores these operational costs entirely.

Lastly, there is no competitor analysis . In 2016, the peer-to-peer storage space was becoming crowded with players like Neighbor and Clutter. By not mentioning the competition, Sharebee misses the chance to explain why their specific model (perhaps their focus on the Canadian market or their specific insurance partnership with Intact Insurance, mentioned in their self-description but not the slides) is superior.

What a Founder Should Copy

Founders should emulate Sharebee's minimalist aesthetic . Each slide has one job and one primary message. This prevents 'death by bullet point' and keeps the audience focused on the speaker during a live presentation. The use of full-bleed imagery to establish the 'Problem' is a masterclass in storytelling.

The Founder Slide (Slide 18) is also a great template. Instead of long bios, they use recognizable logos to establish credibility instantly. If you have worked at a major tech firm or attended a top-tier university, the logo does more work than a paragraph of text ever could.

Finally, the Summary Slide (Slide 22) is a perfect way to end a pitch. It leaves the three most impressive numbers on the screen during the Q&A session, ensuring that the final impression left on the investors is one of growth and momentum.

Company: Sharebee · Sector: Peer-to-Peer Storage / Marketplace · Stage: Seed · Year: 2016 · Slides: 22 · Deck Type: Investor Pitch Deck · Outcome: Raised $525,600 · HQ: Montréal, Québec, Canada

Frequently asked questions

How does Sharebee differentiate itself from traditional self-storage?: Sharebee positions itself as a peer-to-peer alternative that is 60% cheaper and more conveniently located than traditional facilities. The deck uses slides 5 through 7 to visually compare traditional storage to a prison-like environment, highlighting pain points such as high costs, hidden fees, and a lack of service, which Sharebee aims to solve through a digital-first, community-based model.
What specific traction did Sharebee show to investors?: The deck presents clear financial growth, showing booked sales increasing from CAD 100,000 in Q4 2018 to over CAD 300,000 by Q2 2019 (Slide 10). They also emphasize an 80% quarter-over-quarter growth rate (Slide 11) and conclude the deck by stating they have served over 1,000 customers (Slide 22).
What is the 'Online Photo Catalog' feature mentioned in the deck?: On slide 16, Sharebee showcases a digital interface where users can view photos of their stored items (e.g., sofas, coffee tables, TVs). This feature allows customers to manage their inventory remotely and request specific items for 'Deliver on-demand' service, bridging the gap between physical storage and digital convenience.
Who are the founders and what is their background?: The company was led by Co-founder and CEO Maxime Villemure and Co-founder and CTO Adlene Barouche. Slide 18 highlights their backgrounds, including education at McGill University and professional experience at high-profile firms such as JPMorgan Chase, Sony, and Twitter, providing the team with significant technical and business credibility.
What are the major omissions in the Sharebee pitch deck?: The deck is notably missing a 'Use of Funds' or 'The Ask' slide, which typically details how much capital is being raised and where it will be spent. Additionally, there is no mention of unit economics (CAC/LTV), a competitive landscape analysis, or a detailed roadmap for future expansion beyond the current Canadian and US market figures.

Cover slide of the Sharebee pitch deck — Seed 2016 — Sharebee pitch deck, slide 1 (2016)

Sharebee pitch deck: the facts

Company: Sharebee
Year: 2016
Stage: Seed
Slides: 22

Sharebee pitch deck PDF

The full Sharebee deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Sharebee pitch deck was used for

This deck is Sharebee’s 2016 **seed-stage investor pitch deck** for its peer-to-peer self-storage and parking marketplace headquartered in Montréal, Canada. It was used to raise capital by contrasting traditional, "prison-like" self‑storage facilities with a modern, app-based sharing-economy solution that turns underused residential and commercial space into storage inventory, and anchors the opportunity in a claimed ~$100B global market. The archive listing and teardown note a catalogued outcome of approximately $525,600 raised from this deck, although that number does not appear directly on the slides and is not corroborated by primary funding announcements. In practice, externally reported rounds around 2016–2019 include a CA$100k angel round and a later pre-seed/seed round led by a self‑storage operator, suggesting this deck was part of early angel/seed fundraising efforts.

Business model: Web and mobile **peer-to-peer marketplace** that connects people with spare storage or parking space to people who need local, lower-cost storage or parking solutions.

Lead investor: All Canadian Self-Storage
Investors: All Canadian Self-Storage (lead), Broken Glass Angels, JN Guillemette (ex-Uber Montréal GM), Independent angel investors
Founded: 2016
Founders: Maxime Villemure
Headquarters: Montréal, Québec, Canada
Industry: Sharing economy / marketplace for self‑storage and parking (storage tech / smart city).

Round: Pre-seed/Seed (2019 round); earlier 2016 angel round associated with this deck.

Year: 2016 deck; major externally reported pre-seed/seed funding round closed in 2019.

Raised: Approximately CAD$400k pre-seed/seed round reported in funding databases and press coverage; plus a CA$100k angel round referenced in pitch-deck libraries, with total reported funding around CAD$450k.

Total funding: At least CAD$400k–450k in disclosed pre-seed/seed funding rounds, plus an angel round of CA$100k referenced in deck databases.

Use of funds as presented: Expansion into the Greater Toronto Area, improvements to renter and host experience on the platform, and hiring new talent, as stated in the investment announcement.

What happened after the Sharebee deck

Following its 2016 seed/angel deck, Sharebee grew into a recognized Canadian peer-to-peer storage and parking platform, participated in a smart city accelerator, appeared on Dragons’ Den, and raised a pre-seed/seed round led by a major self‑storage operator to expand into Toronto; funding databases and press releases collectively report total funding in the mid six-figure range.

Participation in the **InnoCité MTL smart city accelerator** in April 2017, as one of seven startups selected for the co
Appearance on the Quebec TV show **Dans l’oeuil du dragon** (Dragons’ Den), which helped drive early popularity and expo
Completion of a **pre-seed/seed funding round** led by All Canadian Self‑Storage with participation from Broken Glass An
Expansion from Montréal to the **Greater Toronto Area**, cited as a use of funds in the 2019 investment announcement.

What the Sharebee deck got right

Strong narrative contrast of old vs. new storage. The deck delivers a **clear, emotional contrast** between “prison-like” traditional self‑storage facilities and a friendly, app-based peer-to-peer solution, helping investors quickly grasp the problem and Sharebee’s differentiated value proposition.
Compelling asset-light marketplace model. By positioning itself squarely within the **sharing economy** and leveraging underused residential and commercial space, Sharebee communicates an **asset-light, scalable model** that aligns with successful marketplace precedents like Airbnb.
Clear articulation of a very large market opportunity. The deck anchors the opportunity in a **large stated TAM (~$100B global, $40B US, $4B Canada)**, which underscores the potential scale of the business if the model works, even if methodological detail is limited.
Memorable minimalist design and focus. The minimalist, highly visual design makes the deck **easy to scan and remember**, reinforcing key concepts (peer-to-peer, app-based, modern experience) without overwhelming investors with text.
Differentiated features and media validation supporting the story. External coverage of Sharebee highlights features such as **insurance coverage for hosts and renters** and successful **Dragons’ Den exposure**, which, when connected to the deck’s story, provide strong signals of risk management and market validation.

What could have been stronger

No explicit funding ask or use-of-funds. External teardown of the deck notes that it **lacks a formal “Ask” slide**: there is no clear statement of how much capital is being requested, at what valuation, or how proceeds will be allocated, even though later sources state they raised significant funding; this omission forces investors to infer the round size and structure from context.
High-level market sizing without visible methodology. The deck anchors the story in a very large **TAM (~$100B globally; $40B US; $4B Canada)** but, according to the teardown, does not show bottoms-up assumptions, segment definitions, or sensitivity analysis, making the market sizing **high-level rather than analytically grounded** for investors who require robust TAM/SAM/SOM detail.
Minimal detail on unit economics and traction. Analysts note that the deck is **highly visual and low-text**, which aids storytelling but results in thin coverage of unit economics, acquisition costs, retention metrics or concrete traction figures; for investors, this limits the ability to assess profitability paths and scalability from the deck alone.
Underused later proof points not emphasized in early deck. Secondary sources highlight later features such as insurance coverage, Dragons’ Den exposure and specific earnings for listers, but these **do not appear to be clearly quantified in the 2016 deck**, suggesting a missed opportunity to showcase early proof points and differentiated product features in the original fundraising narrative.

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Whether the **peer-to-peer storage and parking model** can reliably deliver safe, insured, and convenient alternatives to traditional self‑storage at scale, given Sharebee’s claim of disrupting a multi‑billion-dollar industry.
How Sharebee’s marketplace economics work: take rate, typical host earnings (e.g., averages quoted in later articles), renter savings versus conventional storage, and how these compare to incumbents.
Evidence that the large **TAM figures (~$100B globally)** are supported by credible third‑party data and a robust segmentation of storage and parking markets in North America.
Operational capabilities to manage risk (screening of hosts, insurance, dispute resolution) and maintain quality at scale in a distributed, asset‑light model.

Risks that stand out

Two-sided marketplaces face **chicken-and-egg challenges**; without sufficient hosts, renter value is low, and vice versa, making early growth and local liquidity a core execution risk.
The deck’s emphasis on visual storytelling and high-level TAM, without detailed unit economics or ask, increases the risk that investors underestimate capital requirements or overestimate profitability.
Regulatory and zoning issues around informal storage and parking, as well as potential liability events, could constrain growth or increase costs if not carefully managed with insurance and compliance.
Competition from traditional self‑storage chains and emerging digital marketplaces may pressure margins and make differentiation on convenience and price harder to sustain over time.

Questions this deck invites

What specific **funding amount and valuation** was Sharebee seeking with this 2016 deck, and how was the eventual capital (angel plus pre-seed/seed) allocated across product, marketing, operations and expansion to Toronto?
What were Sharebee’s **key traction metrics at the time of the deck** (active hosts, active renters, booked nights/cubic feet, GMV, retention), and how did those metrics evolve through the 2017 accelerator participation and 2019 seed round?
How do **unit economics** look across different cities and segments (e.g., residential garages vs. commercial spaces): contribution margin per booking, host payout, marketing CAC, and payback period?
What specific **risk and insurance mechanisms** were in place in 2016 (underwriting partners, coverage limits, claims history), and how did these evolve to support Sharebee’s claim of being the only peer-to-peer storage company in North Ame
How defensible is Sharebee’s position versus international competitors (e.g., other storage marketplaces), and what is the long-term strategy regarding regulation, municipal rules, and partnerships with traditional self‑storage operators?

What founders can take from the Sharebee deck

A **highly visual, low-text deck** can effectively communicate a simple marketplace concept and emotional contrast ("prison-like" storage vs. welcoming peer-to-peer spaces), but it must be balanced with enough quantitative detail for investor diligence.
Anchoring a pitch in a **large, clearly articulated TAM** helps investors see the scale of opportunity, yet the market sizing must be backed by methodology and segmented data to avoid appearing superficial.
Leaving out a specific **"Ask" slide** (round size, valuation, and use of proceeds) risks confusion; even if the catalog or external sources track the eventual amount raised, investors expect clarity during the pitch itself.
Positioning as an **asset-light sharing-economy platform** that leverages underused space can be powerful, especially when supported by host earning examples and renter savings versus traditional options, as later coverage of Sharebee demonstrates.
Media exposure (e.g., Dragons’ Den appearances, accelerator selection) and differentiated features like **custom insurance** are valuable proof points and should be clearly surfaced in fundraising materials to strengthen credibility.
Consistency between **deck-stated outcomes** and externally verifiable funding history is important; mismatches between catalogued raise amounts and public pre-seed/seed disclosures highlight the need to clearly document rounds and uses of capital.

Sharebee pitch deck: common questions

What does Sharebee do?

Sharebee is a **peer-to-peer storage and parking marketplace**: it connects people who have spare space in their homes, garages, basements or driveways with people who need affordable, local storage or parking, functioning similarly to Airbnb but for storage and parking.

When was Sharebee founded and by whom?

Multiple sources report that Sharebee was **founded in 2016** in Montréal, Québec, Canada, by entrepreneur Maxime Villemure (who is cited as co‑founder and CEO) and two other Montréal-based co‑founders referenced more generally in a case study.

How much funding did Sharebee raise with this pitch deck?

The catalogued deck entry lists a **2016 seed/angel deck** that raised about **$525,600**, but that specific amount appears only in secondary pitch‑deck libraries. Externally verifiable funding milestones include: a **CA$100k angel round** around 2016, and a later **pre-seed/seed round of roughly CA$400k** led by All Canadian Self‑Storage with participation from Broken Glass Angels, JN Guillemette and other angels.

Who invested in Sharebee’s early funding rounds?

Sharebee’s widely reported **pre-seed/seed round** was led by Toronto-based self‑storage company **All Canadian Self‑Storage**, with participation from **Broken Glass Angels**, former Uber Montréal general manager **JN Guillemette**, and a group of independent angels; these investors are cited in funding announcements and databases rather than in the deck itself.

Where does Sharebee operate and where is it based?

Sharebee is headquartered in **Montréal, Québec, Canada**, and its early operations focused on Eastern Canada (notably Montréal and later the Greater Toronto Area), with expansion to Toronto explicitly mentioned as a use of funds in the pre-seed/seed announcement.