Babson Summer Venture Program Pitch Deck Teardown

An analytical teardown of David Chang's 2019 presentation for the Babson Summer Venture Program on how to raise a seed round.

The Babson Summer Venture Program presentation is a tactical roadmap for founders entering the seed stage. Presented by David Chang in July 2019, the deck moves beyond high-level theory to address the 'how-to' of fundraising. It categorizes capital sources by cost and size, defines the phases of a fundraising campaign—Prep, Target, Socialize, Raise, and Close—and demystifies complex deal structures like SAFEs and convertible notes. By emphasizing the importance of milestones such as product/market fit and execution, the deck provides a realistic framework for valuation and dilution. It serves…

Key takeaways

Introduction and Context

The Babson Summer Venture Program (SVP) is a prestigious accelerator for student entrepreneurs. This deck, titled "How 2 Raise a Seed Round," was presented by David Chang in July 2019. Unlike a typical startup pitch deck designed to sell a specific product, this is an educational teardown of the fundraising process itself. It serves as a tactical guide for founders who have moved past the ideation phase and are ready to engage with the capital markets.

Slide 1: Title Slide

The title slide establishes the context: Babson Summer Venture Program, July 2019. It identifies David Chang (@changds) as the presenter. The branding is clean and academic, utilizing Babson’s signature green. The use of "How 2" suggests a pragmatic, shorthand approach to a complex topic.

Slide 2: Background

This slide uses a collage of images to establish the presenter's credibility. It features Cornell University, Harvard Business School (HBS), and Goldman Sachs. The imagery includes a campus view, a lecture hall, and a high-density trading floor. This establishes a pedigree of both elite academic training and high-stakes financial experience.

Slide 3: Angel Investments

Chang showcases his track record as an investor, dividing his portfolio into "Direct" and "Via Syndicate/Fund." Notable logos in the direct column include Amino, Cuseum, and Crashlytics. The syndicate column includes Logz.io, Soofa, and Zagster. This slide serves as proof of market participation; the presenter is not just a theorist but an active player in the ecosystem he is describing.

Slide 4: The Cohort

A group photo in front of "One Financial Center" shows a diverse group of young entrepreneurs. This likely represents the Babson SVP cohort. It humanizes the presentation and reinforces the community aspect of the program.

Slide 5: The Obstacle

A simple image of a brick wall with the text "What obstacles stand in your way?" serves as a rhetorical transition. It prompts the audience to identify their specific hurdles—be it lack of network, unrefined product, or unclear financial modeling—before the deck provides the solutions.

Slide 6: Capital Sources Matrix

This is one of the most content-dense slides in the deck. It plots various funding sources on a graph of Cost (Y-axis) vs. Size (X-axis). Grants, Competitions, and Customers are shown as the lowest cost. Traditional VC and Private Equity are the largest in size but also the highest in cost (in terms of equity and control). Friends & Family and Personal Loans occupy the low-size, high-cost quadrant (due to personal risk). This visualization helps founders understand that 'money is not just money'—each source has a different profile.

Slide 7: Venture Capital Dynamics

Using a baseball stadium as a backdrop, the slide notes two hard truths about VC: "Skewed return distribution" and "VCs must swing for the fences." This explains the 'Power Law' of venture capital—that a few massive winners pay for all the losers—and why VCs are often uninterested in 'lifestyle businesses' that cannot scale to a billion-dollar exit.

Slide 8: How Much to Raise

The deck provides a three-step framework for calculating the 'Ask.' First, build a basic financial model of cost drivers and revenue. Second, forecast monthly for 2 years. Third, apply the rule of thumb: raise 12-18 months of cash. This gives founders a mathematical basis for their fundraising target rather than picking a round number out of thin air.

Slide 9: Milestones

This slide lists the hierarchy of what investors are actually buying: Team, Product Development, Market Demand, Product/Market Fit, Business Model, and Execution. It includes a link to a TechCrunch article emphasizing that running out of money is a failure of planning, not a milestone of progress. This slide forces founders to evaluate where they actually sit on the maturity curve.

Slide 10: Fundraising Campaign Phases

The process is broken into five linear steps: Prep, Target, Socialize, Raise, and Close. Each is represented by a simple icon (pencil, target, speech bubbles, up arrow, checkmark). This framework demystifies the 'black box' of fundraising by treating it as a standard sales funnel.

Slide 11: Target Criteria

Founders are told to filter potential investors by six criteria: Stage, Location, Industry Vertical, Business Model, Investment Thesis, and Social/Trust Filter. This prevents the 'spray and pray' approach, encouraging founders to only pitch investors whose mandates align with the company's current state.

Slide 12: Socialize

The 'Socialize' phase is defined by four bullets: prioritize the sequence of outreach, find connections to 30+ targets, use tactics like warm intros, and spend 2-3 months networking. This is a crucial takeaway: fundraising starts long before the formal 'pitch' happens.

Slide 13: Refine Pitch

This slide focuses on the iterative nature of the deck. Founders should incorporate feedback and double down on consistent themes that resonate with investors. However, it warns against "whiplash changes"—changing the core business model every time an investor asks a difficult question.

Slide 14: Create Urgency

Fundraising is a momentum game. The slide suggests using an "Anchor investor" as the first domino. It also mentions "Triggering events" to get a term sheet. This acknowledges that investors are often motivated by the Fear Of Missing Out (FOMO).

Slide 15: Structure (Equity vs. Debt)

The deck compares Equity (Preferred Stock) and Debt (Convertible Notes, SAFEs). Equity involves board seats and liquidation preferences. Debt is described as a bridge to equity with no immediate valuation, a 'cap' that acts as a ceiling, interest rates under 10%, and conversion discounts. This is essential technical knowledge for any seed-stage founder.

Slide 16: Valuation & Dilution

A bar chart visualizes the growth in valuation from Seed to Series A ($12M) to Series B ($30M). A pie chart with a question mark asks, "what’s your end stake?" This warns founders to look past the headline valuation number and understand how much of the company they will actually own after multiple rounds of dilution.

Slide 17: Final Deal Points

The 'Close' isn't just a signature. It involves a checklist of terms: Board composition, Option pool, Voting rights, Founder vesting, Change of control, Redemption rights, Information rights, and Anti-dilution. The slide reminds founders: "Not done until money is in the bank."

Slide 18: Find the Right Investors

The final slide uses a wedding photo to illustrate that the founder-investor relationship is a long-term marriage. It serves as a final reminder that who you take money from is just as important as how much you take.

What This Deck Does Well

The Babson SVP deck excels at process transparency . Most pitch decks focus on the 'what' (the idea), but this deck focuses on the 'how' (the execution of the raise). By breaking the campaign into five phases (Slide 10) and providing a specific matrix for capital sources (Slide 6), it gives founders a functional checklist. The inclusion of technical details regarding SAFEs and convertible notes (Slide 15) ensures that the advice is grounded in legal and financial reality rather than just motivational speaking.

What Is Missing From This Deck

As an educational tool, the deck is comprehensive, but it lacks specific case studies . While Slide 3 lists Chang's investments, the deck does not walk through a specific 'win' or 'loss' to illustrate how the deal points on Slide 17 played out in a real-world scenario. Additionally, there is no mention of legal costs or the specific documentation (like a Data Room) required during the 'Close' phase. While it mentions 'Socializing' for 2-3 months, it doesn't provide a template for the 'Warm Intro' it recommends.

Founder's Cheat Sheet: What to Copy

The Capital Matrix: Every founder should recreate Slide 6 for their own industry. Mapping out where the 'cheap' money is (grants/customers) versus the 'expensive' money (VC) is vital for strategic planning. · The 12-18 Month Rule: Use the formula on Slide 8. Don't just ask for $1M because it sounds like a seed round; ask for the specific amount your 2-year monthly forecast dictates you need to reach your next milestone. · The Targeting Filter: Before sending a single email, run every potential investor through the six filters on Slide 11. If they don't invest in your 'Industry Vertical' or 'Stage,' they are a waste of your time. · The Socialization Period: Build in the 2-3 month 'Socialize' window (Slide 12). Founders who try to 'Raise' without 'Socializing' first often find themselves with a cold pipeline and no momentum. · The Urgency Tactic: Focus on finding the 'Anchor Investor' (Slide 14). The first 10% of a round is the hardest to raise; the remaining 90% follows the leader.

Frequently asked questions

What is the recommended fundraising timeline according to the deck?
The deck suggests a multi-month process. Specifically, the 'Socialize' phase alone is recommended to take 2-3 months (Slide 12). During this time, founders should find the strongest connections to at least 30 targets and prioritize their sequence of outreach. This implies that a full campaign, from preparation to closing, likely spans 4-6 months.
How does the deck define the difference between equity and debt financing?
Slide 15 breaks this down clearly. Equity involves Preferred Stock with liquidation preferences, board seats, and an option pool. Debt, including Convertible Notes and SAFEs, is described as debt that converts to preferred equity upon a future raise. Key debt features mentioned include the lack of an immediate valuation (using a 'cap' instead), interest rates below 10%, and conversion discounts.
What specific milestones should a founder demonstrate to investors?
Slide 9 lists six critical milestones: Team, Product Development, Market Demand, Product/Market Fit, Business Model, and Execution. The slide references a TechCrunch article titled 'Running out of money isn't a milestone,' emphasizing that investors look for tangible progress in market validation and operational capability rather than just survival.
What strategy does the deck suggest for creating investor urgency?
Slide 14 focuses on 'Creating Urgency.' The primary tactic is securing an 'anchor investor' who acts as the first domino to trigger interest from others. Additionally, founders are encouraged to use 'triggering events'—such as a competing term sheet or a significant business milestone—to force a decision or secure better terms from prospective investors.
How should a founder determine the amount of capital to raise?
According to Slide 8, the amount should be driven by a basic financial model of cost drivers and revenue. Founders should create a monthly forecast for 2 years. The 'rule of thumb' provided is to raise enough to cover 12-18 months of cash, ensuring the company has sufficient runway to reach its next major valuation-inflection milestone.

Babson Summer Venture Program Pitch Deck Teardown pitch deck PDF

The full Babson Summer Venture Program Pitch Deck Teardown deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

Related fundraising guides (24)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database