Greengar Pitch Deck (2008): 25-Slide Seed Deck

See all 25 slides of the Greengar pitch deck — a 2008 Seed deck — with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

Greengar’s pitch deck is a product of the early App Store gold rush, emphasizing raw download volume and cross-platform potential over complex financial modeling. With 8 million downloads cited on slide 2, the company established immediate credibility in a nascent mobile market. The deck highlights 'Whiteboard: Collaborative Drawing' as its primary engine for growth, showcasing real-time synchronization across iOS, Android, and desktop devices. While the deck lacks traditional slides for unit economics, market sizing (TAM/SAM), or a specific financial 'ask,' it compensates with strong social…

Key takeaways

The Hook: Immediate Traction

Slides 1-2: The Opening Gambit

Greengar opens with a minimalist black slide asking, "Are you on your iPhone?" (Slide 1). This is a classic 'know your audience' move, immediately centering the conversation on the hardware that drives their business. It is followed immediately by the 'Traction' slide (Slide 2), which is the strongest part of the deck. It displays the App Store listing for "Whiteboard Lite: Collaborative Drawing" and states, "It's already got 8 million downloads."

By leading with 8 million downloads, Greengar bypasses the need to prove product-market fit. In 2008-2013, these were massive numbers for an independent studio. The slide also shows a 4.5-star rating from 493 reviews, providing immediate social proof. The phrase "Get it, or not" suggests a level of confidence—or perhaps bravado—common in early mobile startup culture.

Slides 3-4: Product and Vague Monetization

Slide 3 provides a full-screen mockup of the Whiteboard app on an iPhone. The interface is simple: a color picker, drawing tools, and a 'Connect' button. This reinforces the 'Collaborative' aspect mentioned in the title. Slide 4 is an enigma; it features a dark background with faint, floating dollar signs. While it clearly alludes to money, it fails to explain the business model. Is it ad-supported? Is there a pro version? The deck leaves the investor to guess how those 8 million downloads translate into a sustainable business.

The Team and Social Proof

Slides 5-7: Pedigree and Endorsements

The team slide (Slide 5) introduces Thuy Truong (CEO) , Elliot Lee (CCO) , and Long Trieu (Lead Developer) . The founders highlight their USC backgrounds (Computer Science and Computer Engineering, Class of 2009). Thuy Truong is noted as the founder of 'Parallel Yogurt' and a former sales specialist at B of A (Bank of America). Elliot Lee is credited with building and selling two websites and making a web page at age 8. This establishes a mix of technical skill and entrepreneurial history.

Slide 6 features a photo of Nathan Smith , labeled as a "Distinguished Consumer (Child)." This is likely an attempt at humor or to show the app's ease of use across demographics. More substantial is Slide 7, which features Scott Flansburg , the "Guinness World Record Fastest Human Calculator." Showing a world-renowned mental athlete using the app on a tablet provides a high-level endorsement for the tool's utility in educational or professional settings.

The Vision: Real-Time Collaboration

Slides 8-10: Use Cases and Global Reach

Slide 8 uses a simple illustration to show the app's value proposition: "Real-time collaborating and sharing." It depicts a teacher-like figure sharing PDF, PowerPoint, and Keynote files from a tablet to a projector and multiple student devices. This positions Whiteboard not just as a drawing toy, but as an EdTech or enterprise presentation tool.

Slides 9 and 10 emphasize the company's international footprint. A world map shows team members in San Francisco, Vietnam, and Singapore . Slide 10 overlays the Whiteboard icon in the center of this map with dotted lines connecting the regions. This serves two purposes: it explains how they manage a 24-hour development cycle and highlights the 'collaborative' nature of the company itself.

Slides 11-12: Cross-Platform Capability

These slides are purely visual, showing the word "Hi!" being drawn on a tablet and then instantly appearing on a desktop, laptop, and multiple smartphones. In the early days of the mobile web, seamless real-time synchronization across different operating systems (iOS and Android) and form factors was a significant technical hurdle. These slides demonstrate that Greengar has solved the 'plumbing' of real-time data sync.

The Conclusion

Slide 13: The Goal

The final slide (Slide 13) contains a bold claim: "We already made 1 million. Let's talk about 1 billion!" It provides the contact email and the company logo (a green fish). Like the dollar sign slide earlier, this is high on ambition but low on detail. It is unclear if the '1 million' refers to revenue or a specific user milestone, though given the earlier mention of 8 million downloads, it likely refers to dollars. The '1 billion' target is the 'North Star' metric intended to excite venture capitalists looking for 'unicorn' scale.

What Works

Traction First: Leading with 8 million downloads is a powerful way to command attention. It proves the team can build things people want to install. · Visual Demonstration: Slides 11 and 12 do a great job of explaining a technical feature (cross-platform sync) without using a single word of jargon. · Clear Identity: The deck has a consistent aesthetic—black backgrounds, simple white text, and clear screenshots. It feels like a product-led company. · Social Proof: The inclusion of a Guinness World Record holder (Slide 7) adds a layer of 'cool factor' and professional validation that simple user numbers cannot.

What is Missing

The Ask: There is no slide detailing how much money they are raising, at what valuation, or what the milestones for the next 18 months are. · Business Model: Beyond the vague dollar signs on Slide 4, there is no explanation of how the company makes money. This is a critical flaw for a seed-stage pitch. · Market Analysis: There is no mention of the Total Addressable Market (TAM). Investors need to know if the 'collaborative drawing' space is big enough to support a billion-dollar company. · Competition: The deck ignores competitors. In 2008-2013, there were many whiteboard and collaboration apps. Greengar doesn't explain why they will win against incumbents or other startups. · Unit Economics: There is no mention of Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) or Lifetime Value (LTV). While 8 million downloads are great, if they are all free users with no path to monetization, the business is not venture-scale.

What a Founder Should Copy

The Traction Hook: If you have a 'big number,' put it on Slide 2. Don't make investors wait until the end of the deck to find out you have millions of users. · Minimalist Design: This deck is easy to read. It doesn't clutter the slides with bullet points. It uses images to tell the story of the product's utility. · Global Context: If you have a distributed team, frame it as a strength (Slide 9). It shows you can source talent globally and operate efficiently across time zones. · The 'Show, Don't Tell' Approach: Instead of writing a paragraph about 'low-latency cross-platform synchronization,' Greengar just showed a 'Hi!' appearing on five screens at once. This is much more effective.

Frequently asked questions

What is Greengar's primary product according to the deck?
The primary product featured is 'Whiteboard Lite: Collaborative Drawing.' Slide 2 shows it as a free app in the App Store, and subsequent slides (8, 11, 12) demonstrate its core functionality: allowing multiple users to draw and share content in real-time across different devices.
How much traction did Greengar have at the time of this pitch?
The deck states on slide 2 that the app had already achieved 8 million downloads. The catalogue facts further note that by January 2013, the company surpassed 13 million downloads across its suite of approximately a dozen apps.
Who are the founders of Greengar?
As shown on slide 5, the leadership includes Thuy Truong (Co-Founder & CEO), a USC Computer Science graduate and former founder of Parallel Yogurt; Elliot Lee (Founder & CCO), a USC Computer Engineering graduate; and Long Trieu (Lead Developer), an alumnus of HCM City University of Technology.
What is the business model mentioned in the slides?
The deck is largely silent on a specific monetization strategy. Slide 4 shows floating dollar signs, which hints at revenue generation, and slide 13 mentions having 'already made 1 million,' but there are no details on whether this is through ads, in-app purchases, or subscriptions.
Is there a specific funding request in the deck?
No. The 13 slides provided do not include a 'The Ask' slide. There is no mention of the amount of capital being raised, the valuation, or the intended use of funds, which is a significant omission for a standard pitch deck.
Cover slide of the Greengar pitch deck — Seed 2008
Greengar pitch deck, slide 1 (2008)

Greengar pitch deck: the facts

Company
Greengar
Year
2008
Stage
Seed
Slides
25
Sector
Mobile Apps / Collaboration
Deck type
Investor Pitch
Outcome
Raised $50,000
Headquarters
Ho Chi Minh City / Los Angeles

Greengar pitch deck PDF

The full Greengar deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Greengar (GreenGar Studios) pitch deck was used for

This deck is a seed-stage fundraising presentation for Greengar (also known as GreenGar Studios), a Vietnam-based mobile app studio best known for its **Whiteboard: Collaborative Drawing** app, later evolved into Smartboard. The deck, dated 2008 in the catalog, highlights early traction with millions of downloads for the collaborative whiteboard app and a globally distributed founding team across the U.S. and Asia. It focuses on real-time, cross-platform drawing and collaboration, positioning the company as a leading mobile collaboration tool provider in education and productivity use cases. The fundraising objective appears to be scaling the flagship collaborative drawing product and the broader app portfolio based on the traction and revenue claims shown in the deck.

Business model: Mobile app studio focused on productivity and collaboration apps, with freemium and paid apps distributed via iOS and Android app stores.

Year
2013
Lead investor
500 Startups (for the accelerator program participation).
Investors
500 Startups (accelerator program, Spring 2013 batch).
Founded
2010
Founders
Truong Thanh Thuy (Thuy Thanh Truong), Elliot Lee
Industry
Mobile applications; collaboration and productivity software.

Round: Seed/accelerator participation (500 Startups Spring 2013 batch).

Headquarters: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (studio based in Ho Chi Minh City leveraging local software engineering talent).

Use of funds as presented: Not explicitly detailed in available sources; participation in 500 Startups implies use of funds and program support for product development, growth experiments, and scaling of the Whiteboard/Smartboard collaborative app.

What happened after the Greengar (GreenGar Studios) deck

Greengar (GreenGar Studios) built one of the most widely used collaborative whiteboard apps on mobile, achieving millions of downloads, top App Store rankings, and over US$1 million in profits, and it became the first Vietnamese startup in 500 Startups; however, according to later accounts, the company was unable to raise the capital needed to scale and was ultimately closed down.

What the Greengar (GreenGar Studios) deck got right

What could have been stronger

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Risks that stand out

Questions this deck invites

What founders can take from the Greengar (GreenGar Studios) deck

Greengar (GreenGar Studios) pitch deck: common questions

Who founded Greengar and what is the company known for?

Greengar (GreenGar Studios) is a mobile app studio founded by Vietnamese entrepreneur **Truong Thanh Thuy** with fellow USC alumnus **Elliot Lee**, known primarily for **Whiteboard: Collaborative Drawing**, a real-time collaborative whiteboard app that reached #1 in the Productivity category on the iOS App Store in the U.S. and other countries.

What product is featured in Greengar’s pitch deck?

Greengar’s flagship product is **Whiteboard: Collaborative Drawing**, later rebuilt and branded as **Smartboard**, a real-time collaborative drawing and whiteboard tool that allows multiple mobile devices to connect and draw together on a shared canvas; it was featured by Apple hundreds of times and targeted both educational and business collaboration use cases.

How much traction had Greengar’s collaborative drawing app achieved at the time of the deck?

According to Greengar’s own materials and later profiles, the Whiteboard/Smartboard app surpassed **8–9 million downloads** in its first several years, with some sources citing more than **10–12 million downloads** across the company’s app portfolio and noting usage in schools in over 100 countries. The deck itself specifically cites **8 million downloads** as an early traction milestone.

When was this Greengar pitch deck created, and how does it relate to later funding milestones?

The catalog lists this as a **2008 seed-stage** deck with **25 slides** in the mobile apps / collaboration sector, and the deck’s content focuses on app-store traction, global usage, and monetization rather than later accelerator participation. However, independent company sources indicate GreenGar Studios was formally launched around **2010** and later joined **500 Startups** in the **Spring 2013** batch, so the catalog year likely reflects an early or precursor pitch to seed investors rather than the 500 Startups round itself.

Did Greengar raise funding successfully, and what happened to the company afterward?

Greengar graduated from the **500 Startups Spring 2013 batch**, making it the first Vietnamese company in that Silicon Valley accelerator. Multiple profiles and interviews note that the business generated over **US$1 million** in profits from its Whiteboard app and related products but ultimately failed to raise sufficient capital to scale further, leading to the company’s eventual wind-down despite strong user traction.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-21 from the pages below.

Greengar pitch deck slides

Greengar pitch deck slide 1 of 25
Greengar pitch deck — slide 1 of 25
Greengar pitch deck slide 2 of 25
Greengar pitch deck — slide 2 of 25
Greengar pitch deck slide 3 of 25
Greengar pitch deck — slide 3 of 25
Greengar pitch deck slide 4 of 25
Greengar pitch deck — slide 4 of 25
Greengar pitch deck slide 5 of 25
Greengar pitch deck — slide 5 of 25
Greengar pitch deck slide 6 of 25
Greengar pitch deck — slide 6 of 25

What each slide of the Greengar pitch deck says

Slide 1

angel.co/greengar founders@greengar.com Are you on your iPhone?

Slide 2

angel.co/greengar founders@greengar.com Are you on your iPhone”? GOOD! Now go to @ and search for “whiteboard”

Slide 3

angel.co/greengar founders@greengar.com Q whiteboard [x] h FREE i = It's already got Get it, or not. sar 8 million _- downloads Jd

Slide 6

angel.co/greengar founders@greengar.com “Maybe more 5 ’ Fo orth ©) Trés pratique. © bucket tool, and Bien congu | a pencil tool. And maybe — more layers. : “This is a 20 8 BER, ZH —T | Q great app. No— Love it!” [S— stabil und perfekt fur uns als ® werbemittelagentur. ist “The best taeglich im einsatz bei . actpro.de © EIT0 gene ver ll). Tuesday, M23, 18

Slide text above is read directly from the Greengar deck PDF embedded on this page.

Related fundraising guides (24)

This deck's categories (2)

Decks from the same region (1)

Decks with a similar raise (1)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

Decks in the same category (12)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Related pitch decks (3)

Browse by topic (1)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database