Orto Pitch Deck: 30-Slide Breakdown

See all 30 slides of the Orto pitch deck, with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

Orto's August 2016 pitch deck outlines a 'co-leasing' service for sports cars, targeting high-earning professionals in London. The model involves charging upfront fees and all-inclusive monthly subscriptions for a two-year term, with the company retaining the vehicle's residual value at the end. The deck is notable for its granular unit economics, which transparently show a -81% gross margin on the first car, improving to 19% by the 17th vehicle through reduced interest rates and lower insurance premiums. While the deck lacks a traditional team slide in this selection, it highlights a lead in…

Key takeaways

Introduction and Value Proposition

The Orto pitch deck, dated August 2016, introduces a niche but clearly defined service: co-leasing for sports cars. The cover slide (Slide 1) establishes a professional, corporate identity with a clean logo and a specific geographic focus on London. The sub-headline, "Co-leasing for sports cars," immediately identifies the product-market fit, targeting the luxury automotive sector through a shared-economy lens.

The Business Model

Slide 7 breaks down the Orto business model into two categories: the core co-leasing service and additional value-added services. The core service is a two-year term where customers pay an upfront fee followed by all-inclusive monthly subscriptions. Orto manages the procurement, insurance, and maintenance. Crucially, the slide notes that at the end of the term, Orto sells the car and retains the difference after clearing finance, which is a primary revenue driver. The additional services include a 10% commission on short-term rentals, brokerage fees for traditional leases, and commissions on 'Orto Experiences' like events and travel. This multi-layered revenue approach suggests the founders were thinking about customer lifetime value beyond the initial lease.

Market Sizing and Target Customer

Slide 10 provides a detailed look at the target demographic. Orto focuses on professionals in major cities earning between £50,000 and £150,000. They quantify the London market at 400,000 people. By citing market research from 2012 and IBM data on subscription pricing, they estimate a 15% interest level, resulting in a targetable market of 60,000 potential customers in Inner London. This slide is effective because it moves from a broad population to a specific, researched subset, providing a realistic foundation for their growth projections.

Social Proof and Traction

Slide 13 utilizes customer testimonials to validate the model. Three customers—Chris, William, and Ali—all associated with a Jaguar F-Type S Coupe in April 2016, provide quotes. The testimonials highlight key pain points Orto solves: avoiding depreciation, the convenience of door-to-door delivery, and the ability to drive a high-end car without a massive initial outlay. These quotes serve as early evidence of product-market fit, even if the sample size is small.

Go-to-Market Strategy

Slide 16 outlines a lean marketing strategy. The company relies on car-specific online display advertising and PR to generate leads, which are then converted via telephone and email. The growth plan is incremental: co-leasing two cars in months two and three, three cars in months four and five, and four cars by months six and seven. This measured approach to scaling suggests a focus on operational stability rather than reckless growth, which aligns with the high-capital nature of the automotive industry.

Board and Investor Pedigree

Slide 19 focuses on the company's backing. Rather than a standard team slide, this selection highlights the lead investors, specifically Chris Clark. The slide details Clark's background at Hermes Private Equity and his track record with companies like Jasmine Healthcare and WTG Technologies. Mentioning a "2.8x money multiple" for investors in a previous exit provides the startup with immediate institutional credibility, signaling to new investors that the venture is overseen by experienced hands.

Unit Economics: The Core of the Pitch

Slide 25 is arguably the most important slide in the deck. It presents a transparent comparison of unit economics between 'Car 1' and 'Car 17'. It shows a gross loss of £28,720 (-81% margin) on the first vehicle, primarily due to high interest (20% APR) and insurance costs. However, it projects a shift to an £8,978 profit (19% margin) by the 17th car. The slide explains exactly how this will be achieved: securing a commercial loan at 5.1% APR, reducing insurance through scale, and lowering customer acquisition costs from £4,000 to £1,000. This level of granular detail is rare and highly valuable for investors, as it shows the founders have a deep understanding of their cost levers.

Exit Strategy

Slide 28 concludes the narrative with exit options. Orto positions itself as an acquisition target for major leasing companies, rental firms, or automotive manufacturers (citing examples like Toyota/Uber and GM/Lyft). They explicitly state a target of a 10x to 20x investment multiple between years five and eight. To ground this in reality, they cite the example of Streetcar, co-founded by one of their advisors, which sold to Zipcar for £32.5m. This provides a clear "north star" for the investment's potential outcome.

What Works in This Deck

The standout feature of this deck is its financial transparency . Most early-stage decks attempt to hide negative margins or gloss over the high costs of initial operations. Orto leans into the fact that their first car is a loss-leader and provides a mathematical roadmap to 19% margins. This builds significant trust with an analyst. Furthermore, the market segmentation on slide 10 is excellent; it doesn't just say "everyone who likes cars," but instead narrows the focus to a specific income bracket in a specific city with a specific interest level.

What is Missing

The most glaring omission in this 10-slide sample is a dedicated team slide . While investors are mentioned, the founders' own operational backgrounds are not detailed here. Additionally, there is no competitor analysis slide. While they mention the "fractional ownership model" generally, they do not list direct competitors or explain how they differ from traditional high-end rental agencies or other emerging car-sharing platforms. Finally, the specific funding ask is missing from these slides; we know they are pitching, but we don't know the amount they are seeking or the specific allocation of those funds beyond the general marketing and hiring mentioned on slide 16.

What a Founder Should Copy

Founders should emulate the Unit Economics slide (Slide 25) . The "Current vs. Target" comparison is a powerful way to show how a business becomes viable. By breaking down specific costs like interest, insurance, and acquisition, you show investors exactly which problems you are solving with their capital. Another strong element to copy is the Exit Options slide (Slide 28) . Instead of just saying "we will be acquired," Orto provides a specific peer-group example (Streetcar) and links it back to an advisor on their own team, making the exit feel attainable rather than aspirational.

Final Analysis

Orto's 2016 deck is a disciplined, finance-first presentation. It avoids the typical "disruption" hyperbole and instead focuses on the mechanics of a high-ticket subscription business. The heavy emphasis on London-based professionals and the clear path to lowering the cost of capital makes this a compelling case for a specialized investment. The deck's strength lies in its ability to quantify every assumption, from the number of potential customers to the exact percentage reduction in insurance premiums needed to reach profitability.

Frequently asked questions

How does Orto generate revenue beyond the core leasing service?
Orto identifies three additional revenue streams on slide 7: short-term rentals through an 'Orto calendar' with a 10% commission, brokerage fees for regular full-time car leases, and 'Orto Experiences' which offers event recommendations for a 10% commission on facilities arranged.
What is the specific demographic Orto is targeting?
According to slide 10, the target is professionals in major cities earning £50k-£150k annually. In 2016, their current users were primarily men aged 30-45, though they intended to expand to women and older customers who are open to alternatives to traditional ownership.
Why are the initial margins so low for the first car?
Slide 25 reveals that the first car operates at an £28,720 loss (-81% margin). This is driven by high interest rates (20% APR), high insurance (£14,500 for two years), and high customer acquisition costs (£4,000), all of which are expected to decrease significantly with scale.
What is the projected scale required to reach profitability?
Slide 25 suggests that by the 17th car (projected for Year 1, Month 7), the company expects to reach a 19% gross margin. This assumes they can lower interest to 5.1% APR through a commercial loan and reduce insurance premiums to £2,500 per car.
Who are the key individuals mentioned in the deck?
While a full team slide is missing from this 10-slide sample, slide 19 profiles lead investor Chris Clark, a former Hermes Private Equity professional. Slide 28 also mentions advisor Brett Akker, co-founder of Streetcar, which sold to Zipcar for £32.5m.
Cover slide of the Orto pitch deck
Orto pitch deck, slide 1

Orto pitch deck: the facts

Company
Orto
Slides
30

Orto pitch deck PDF

The full Orto deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Orto Sharing Ltd pitch deck was used for

This deck is the August 2016 pitch presentation for Orto Sharing Ltd, a London‑based startup offering fractional ownership and co‑leasing of premium sports cars such as Jaguar F‑Type and BMW i8. The deck sets out a model where up to four unrelated customers legally co‑lease a single vehicle through Orto, with Orto retaining legal possession and handling administration. It frames the opportunity around urban professionals in major cities, highlights initial negative margins and argues a path to profitability via scaling the fleet. The deck appears to be an early‑stage fundraising document to expand beyond an initial proof‑of‑concept car to additional models and locations.

Business model: Fractional ownership and co-leasing of high‑end sports cars, allowing up to four unrelated customers to share a single vehicle, with online booking and all‑inclusive fees.

Founded
2013
Industry
Motor vehicle manufacturing / car sharing and fractional ownership.

What the Orto Sharing Ltd deck got right

What could have been stronger

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Risks that stand out

Questions this deck invites

What founders can take from the Orto Sharing Ltd deck

Orto Sharing Ltd pitch deck: common questions

What does Orto do?

Orto Sharing Ltd is a London‑based company that offers fractional ownership and co‑leasing of high‑end sports cars, allowing up to four unrelated customers to share a single vehicle at a fraction of the usual cost.

How much cheaper is Orto’s fractional car ownership compared to traditional ownership?

According to the August 2016 pitch deck description, Orto’s model reduces the upfront and total costs of owning a high‑end vehicle by over 60% compared to traditional ownership or leasing, thanks to fractional co‑leasing and all‑inclusive fees.

Which cars did Orto offer in its fractional ownership model?

The deck and TechCrunch article describe Orto’s initial focus on high‑end sports cars, specifically mentioning the Jaguar F‑Type S and BMW i8 as models offered or planned for fractional ownership.

Who was Orto’s target customer and market size in the pitch deck?

The pitches describe Orto as targeting professionals in major cities, and specifically London, who desire premium sports cars but are price‑sensitive and open to sharing, representing a potential market estimated at £1.88 billion across the UK and Europe.

What funding was Orto seeking with the August 2016 pitch deck and did it raise capital?

The SlideShare pitch deck states that Orto had already proven its concept by co‑leasing a Jaguar F‑Type and was seeking investment to expand to more vehicle models and locations, but no publicly available sources specify the exact amount, valuation, investors, or whether the round closed.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

Orto pitch deck slides

Orto pitch deck slide 1 of 30
Orto pitch deck — slide 1 of 30
Orto pitch deck slide 2 of 30
Orto pitch deck — slide 2 of 30
Orto pitch deck slide 3 of 30
Orto pitch deck — slide 3 of 30
Orto pitch deck slide 4 of 30
Orto pitch deck — slide 4 of 30
Orto pitch deck slide 5 of 30
Orto pitch deck — slide 5 of 30
Orto pitch deck slide 6 of 30
Orto pitch deck — slide 6 of 30

What each slide of the Orto pitch deck says

Slide 1

Orto Sharing Ltd Co-leasing for sports cars Pitch deck | August 2016 Josh Darling, Co-Founder | London [ +447949 242 735 | josh@orto.uk.com | orto.uk.com

Slide 2

orto Contents Section Page Summary 3 1. The business 4-7 2. The market 8-16 3. The team 17-21 4. Summary financials 22-25 5. Investment 26-29 Please note this document is accompanied by a notes document, financial forecasts, and a risk assessment, which are available on request. Referencesto the notes document are denoted by a number in brackets e.g. (1). 2016 Orto. In commercial confidence. Numbers in brackets refer to accompanying notes document. 2

Slide 3

orto Summary Five reasons to be excited about this investment opportunity: 1 Ortois an innovative new approach to car sharing for sports cars that provides all the pleasure of having your dream car but for 40% of the normal cost and none of the hassle. 2. We're in anindustry that is ripe for disruption, we've already achieved proof of concept, we have great testimonials from our customers, and numerous leads for the next cars. 3. We are a fully committed team comprising great capability in leadership, technology, and customer experience excellence. 4. Under current assumptions we're targeting net profitability of 11% in three years and 13% in Year 3, Month 12. 5. We're aiming to deliver our…

Slide 5

orto The pain point... Cost comparison with traditional ownership models fora Jaguar F-Type S (1) The world is full of people who love cars, but find it hard to justify buying their dream ~~ 7°" car. That's because they know getting acar ~~ “**" just for fun is expensive, inefficient , and a 0g lot of hassle; whilst renting or using a car —— club means you don't have ‘your’ car and Ee introduces complexity, additional costs, and ~~ “°° inconvenience. Hg | | a — 3 UPFIONTCOST MONTHLYCOST RUNNNGCOST WHOLETERM Orto’s coleasing service solves this UPFRONT MONTHLY RUNNING WHOLE ORTOS problem by letting people share a single pa AS Ll car with three other people on along term On 2249 e480 0 34% NA…

Slide 6

orto -_ [es] a orto Four unrelated customers co- The customers Orto takes care of all the lease asingle new car worth book time with their car details for an upfrontand between £40k and £100k through their Orto calendar monthly fee Customers joina car on atwo-year Each customer has 85 days per The all-inclusive fees include term one at atime through the year which they book via the web collection and delivery, valet, orto.uk.com showroom. They can and an app. The system has inbuilt insurance, maintenance, storage familiarise themselves withthe rules to guarantee faimess of when the car is with Orto, road tax, system and make any pre-sale access, including weekends, and more. Atthe end of th…

Slide text above is read directly from the Orto deck PDF embedded on this page.

Related fundraising guides (24)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database