Medgenics Pitch Deck (2012): 22-Slide Breakdown

See all 22 slides of the Medgenics pitch deck — a 2012 deck — with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

The June 2012 Medgenics investor presentation serves as a technical and clinical update for a company already trading publicly under the ticker MDGN. The narrative centers on the 'Biopump' platform, which uses a patient's own skin tissue to produce therapeutic proteins like Erythropoietin (EPO) and Interferon Alpha (IFN-a). By providing in vitro data showing sustained production for over six months, the deck attempts to de-risk the biological viability of the platform. The company lists a robust pipeline targeting massive markets, including diabetes ($15.5b) and arthritis ($20.9b), though mos…

Key takeaways

Medgenics 2012 Investor Presentation Teardown

This teardown analyzes a subset of slides from the Medgenics June 2012 investor presentation. At this time, the company was positioned as a clinical-stage gene therapy firm focused on sustained protein delivery. Unlike early-stage startups, Medgenics was already public, which shifts the tone of the deck from 'visionary' to 'execution-oriented.'

Slide 1: Title and Public Listing

The cover slide establishes immediate credibility by listing the company's public tickers: NYSE Amex: MDGN and AIM: MEDU, MEDG. The imagery features the Medgenics headquarters, a physical manifestation of the company's scale. The presentation is dated June 13, 2012, and attributed to Andrew L. Pearlman, Ph.D., President & CEO. The tagline 'healing from within' succinctly summarizes the biological approach of the company.

Slide 4: Experienced Management Team

This slide is divided into three pillars: Board of Directors, SAB/Advisors, and Management. It is a 'heavyweight' team slide, emphasizing deep institutional and regulatory ties. Key highlights include:

Andrew L. Pearlman, PhD: Over 25 years in Biomed. · Eugene Bauer, MD: Former Dean of Stanford Medical School. · Isaac Blech: Noted biotech investor with ties to Celgene and ICOS. · Andra E. Miller, PhD: Former FDA cell/gene-therapy group leader (listed under Advisors). · Gary Brukardt: Former CEO of Renal Care Group, which sold for $3.5B.

The inclusion of a former FDA group leader is a strategic move to signal to investors that the company understands the regulatory path for gene therapy, which was notoriously difficult in the early 2010s.

Slide 7: The Biopump Method

This slide explains the mechanics of the product. It breaks the process down into five clear steps: harvesting tissue via needle biopsy, processing it for 10-14 days to transfer the desired gene, measuring protein production, implanting the 'Biopump,' and the ability to reverse the process via ablation. The slide includes a visual comparison of a Biopump next to a toothpick to emphasize its small size, and a photo of a patient's abdomen showing the harvest and implant sites. This makes a complex biological process feel tangible and manageable for a clinician.

Slide 10: EPODURE in vitro Data

Focusing on their anemia treatment, EPODURE, this slide provides technical validation. A bar chart shows 'Long term in vitro EPO secretion' over 185 days. The data suggests that the protein production remains relatively stable after the initial 'Time to Implant' (marked at day 9). The Y-axis uses a logarithmic scale (1 to 10,000 IU/Biopump/day), showing that the pumps can maintain high-level production for 6+ months. This slide is critical for proving that the 'sustained' part of their value proposition is backed by laboratory evidence.

Slide 13: INFRADURE in vitro Data

Mirroring the format of slide 10, this slide covers INFRADURE, the treatment for Hepatitis. It shows sustained Interferon Alpha (IFN-a) production for over 244 days. Again, the 'Time to Implant' is noted at day 9. The consistency of the bars across eight months of testing is intended to combat the common gene therapy hurdle of 'expression fading,' where the body or the modified cells stop producing the protein over time.

Slide 16: Recent Achievements in 2012

This is the 'momentum' slide. It lists milestones achieved in the first and second quarters of 2012:

Positive meeting with NIH RAC for Phase IIb trials in dialysis patients. · Approval for Phase IIa clinical study of EPODURE in Israel. · Filing for FDA Orphan Drug Designation for INFRADURE (Hepatitis D). · US FDA Clearance to initiate Phase IIb trials for anemia. · Launch of a US Biopump GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) processing center in California.

The launch of the GMP facility is a significant operational milestone, indicating the company was moving beyond R&D into clinical manufacturing.

Slide 19: Pipeline for Biopump Platform

This slide demonstrates the versatility of the platform. It lists 11 different conditions, the associated protein, the development stage, and the 2010 market sales for that protein. The table shows:

Anemia: At Phase II ($9.2B market). · Hepatitis: Phase I/II ($2.7B market). · Hemophilia: Preclinical ($4.4B market). · Diabetes: Future Candidate ($15.5B market). · Arthritis: Future Candidate ($20.9B market).

By listing 'Future Candidates' in massive markets like Diabetes and Arthritis, the company is signaling a high ceiling for growth, even if their current clinical focus is narrower.

Slide 22: Closing Image

The final slide in this set is a photograph of the Medgenics team at the NYSE Euronext, dated September 6 (Tuesday). This serves as a reminder of the company's public status and its successful listing on a major US exchange. It is a 'prestige' shot intended to leave investors with a sense of the company's legitimacy and institutional acceptance.

What Medgenics Does Well

Medgenics excels at technical transparency. In an industry where 'black box' technology is common, they provide clear, step-by-step visuals of how the Biopump is harvested and implanted. The use of in vitro data charts (Slides 10 and 13) provides the necessary scientific evidence to support their claims of sustained delivery. Furthermore, the management slide is exceptionally strong, specifically highlighting regulatory expertise which is the primary gatekeeper in biotech.

What is Missing from the Deck

As a public company presentation, this deck lacks several elements found in a standard startup pitch. There is no 'Problem' slide—it assumes the audience understands that daily injections for anemia or hepatitis are a burden. There is no 'Competition' slide comparing Biopump to traditional biologics or other gene therapy platforms like AAV vectors. Most importantly, there is no financial data regarding cash runway, burn rate, or the specific cost of the Phase IIb trials, which are critical metrics for biotech investors.

Founder Takeaways

Founders in the deep tech or life sciences space should study Slide 7. It takes a complex, multi-week medical procedure and distills it into five easy-to-understand steps with scale-reference photos. Additionally, the use of the 'Pipeline' slide (Slide 19) is a masterclass in showing 'Platform Potential.' By showing that the same delivery mechanism can work for EPO, Insulin, and Interferon, they transform from a 'one-drug company' into a 'platform company,' which significantly increases their perceived valuation and strategic importance.

Frequently asked questions

What is the core technology behind Medgenics?
The core technology is the 'Biopump,' a platform that uses a small piece of the patient's own skin tissue. This tissue is genetically modified to produce a specific therapeutic protein and then re-implanted under the patient's skin to provide a continuous, long-term dosage. According to slide 7, the process is reversible through simple excision if treatment needs to be stopped.
What clinical stages had Medgenics reached by June 2012?
By the date of this presentation, Medgenics had reached several milestones. Slide 16 notes that they received US FDA clearance to initiate a Phase IIb trial for anemia in dialysis patients and approval for a Phase IIa study in Israel. Their hepatitis treatment, INFRADURE, had filed for FDA Orphan Drug Designation and was preparing for Phase I/II trials.
How does Medgenics address the market size for its treatments?
Slide 19 provides a detailed pipeline table that correlates specific proteins with disease states and their respective 2010 global sales figures. They target high-value markets such as Anemia ($9.2b), Diabetes ($15.5b), and Arthritis ($20.9b). This slide positions the Biopump as a platform capable of disrupting multiple multi-billion dollar drug categories.
Who were the key members of the Medgenics leadership team?
The team was led by Dr. Andrew L. Pearlman, who had over 25 years of experience in the biomed sector. The board and advisory staff included significant industry figures, such as Eugene Bauer (former Dean of Stanford Med School) and Isaac Blech (investor in Celgene and ICOS), as shown on slide 4.
Is there a financial 'ask' in this pitch deck?
No, this specific deck does not contain a slide detailing a funding requirement, valuation, or use of proceeds. Because Medgenics was already a publicly traded company on the NYSE Amex and AIM at the time (Slide 1), this presentation likely functioned as a general investor relations update rather than a private placement pitch.
Cover slide of the Medgenics pitch deck — Public (NYSE Amex / AIM) 2012
Medgenics pitch deck, slide 1 (2012)

Medgenics pitch deck: the facts

Company
Medgenics
Year
2012
Stage
Public (NYSE Amex / AIM)
Slides
22
Sector
Biotechnology / Gene Therapy
Deck type
Investor Presentation
Outcome
Publicly Traded at time of deck
Headquarters
Misgav, Israel / San Francisco, USA

Medgenics pitch deck PDF

The full Medgenics deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Medgenics pitch deck was used for

This deck is Medgenics’ June 2012 investor presentation, prepared while the company was a dual‑listed public issuer on NYSE Amex (MDGN) and AIM (MEDG/MEDU), to explain and promote its Biopump tissue‑based gene therapy platform and lead programs in anemia (EPODURE) and hepatitis (INFRADURE). In parallel with this investor outreach, Medgenics conducted a private placement in June 2012 that raised approximately $9.5 million in gross proceeds, as disclosed later in its second‑quarter 2012 financial results. The deck positions Biopump as a potential new modality for long‑term protein delivery from a single procedure, highlights early clinical data in anemia and regulatory/strategic milestones in hepatitis, and emphasizes the company’s status as a publicly traded, platform‑stage biotechnology company.

Business model: Developer of a **tissue-based gene therapy platform** called **Biopump**, which uses a patient’s own skin (dermis) tissue that is processed ex vivo with a non‑integrating viral vector to express therapeutic proteins for sustained delivery in chronic diseases such as anemia, hepatitis and hemophilia.

Year
2012

Round: Private placement of common stock and warrants by an already public company (PIPE‑style financing) conducted while listed on NYSE Amex and AIM.

Raised: In June 2012 Medgenics completed a private placement of common stock and warrants raising **$9.5 million** in gross proceeds and approximately **$8.4 million** in net proceeds.

Headquarters: Medgenics operated as a dual‑listed company with activities in Israel and the United States and was listed on NYSE Amex (later NYSE MKT) under the symbol MDGN and on London’s AIM market under the symbols MEDG and MEDU.

Industry: Biotechnology / Gene Therapy: development and commercialization of a **platform for sustained in‑vivo production of therapeutic proteins** using patients’ own tissue.

Use of funds as presented: Medgenics stated in its IPO and financing disclosures that proceeds from equity offerings were intended primarily to fund product development and clinical trials for its Biopump‑based candidates EPODURE (anemia), INFRADURE (hepatitis C and D) and HEMODURE (hemophilia), as well as patent maintenance, IP support and general corporate purposes.

What happened after the Medgenics deck

Publicly available records show that Medgenics progressed its Biopump platform through early‑stage clinical trials and achieved regulatory and funding milestones, including public listings, an IPO, private placements and government grants, but the Biopump programs did not translate into marketed products and the company’s later successor ultimately shifted focus away from this platform.

What the Medgenics deck got right

What could have been stronger

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Risks that stand out

Questions this deck invites

What founders can take from the Medgenics deck

Medgenics pitch deck: common questions

What exactly did Medgenics do and what is the Biopump technology?

Medgenics developed **Biopump**, a tissue‑based gene therapy platform where a small piece of the patient’s skin (dermis) is removed, transduced ex vivo with a non‑integrating viral vector to express a therapeutic protein, and then re‑implanted to provide sustained protein delivery for months to years. The company’s lead programs around 2012 were EPODURE for anemia (erythropoietin production), INFRADURE for hepatitis (interferon alpha) and HEMODURE for hemophilia (Factor VIII).

What fundraise was Medgenics pursuing when this June 2012 deck was used?

The June 2012 deck corresponds to a period when Medgenics was already public on NYSE Amex and AIM and was using the presentation to support investor outreach and a contemporaneous private placement. In its second‑quarter 2012 financial disclosure, Medgenics reported that in June 2012 it raised **$9.5 million** in gross proceeds (approximately **$8.4 million net**) via a private placement of common stock and warrants.

What clinical progress had Medgenics reported around the time of this investor deck?

At the time of the June 2012 deck, EPODURE (erythropoietin‑producing Biopump) had reported proof‑of‑concept Phase I/II data in anemia due to renal failure, with many patients showing at least six months of sustained anemia control and one patient over two years from a single set of Biopumps. Later in 2012, Medgenics presented preliminary Phase IIa data in dialysis patients with end‑stage renal disease, emphasizing the potential to maintain hemoglobin levels with fewer fluctuations than injectable EPO.

What was INFRADURE and what regulatory status did it have in 2012?

INFRADURE is Medgenics’ interferon‑alpha Biopump designed for hepatitis; in June 2012, the US FDA granted **Orphan Drug Designation** for INFRADURE to treat hepatitis D, which the company highlighted as an important regulatory milestone and validation of the platform. Subsequent communications noted additional patent and regulatory progress supporting interferon‑alpha Biopump applications.

What happened to Medgenics and the Biopump programs after this deck?

Medgenics’ Biopump business and assets were later transformed through corporate evolution; external sources indicate that the original Medgenics platform company ultimately transitioned and its later successor focused on different therapeutic areas, with the Biopump programs not progressing to commercial products. The June 2012 deck therefore reflects an earlier stage of the company’s story, where Biopump was a core development focus before later strategic shifts and corporate changes.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

Medgenics pitch deck slides

Medgenics pitch deck slide 1 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck — slide 1 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck slide 2 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck — slide 2 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck slide 3 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck — slide 3 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck slide 4 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck — slide 4 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck slide 5 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck — slide 5 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck slide 6 of 22
Medgenics pitch deck — slide 6 of 22

What each slide of the Medgenics pitch deck says

Slide 1

EET Er — Ee avs Medgenics Presentation LE BZ June 13, 2012 3 $y: ji Andrew L. Pearlman, Ph.D. President & CEO NYSE Amex: MDGN AIM: MEDU, MEDG

Slide 2

edgenics healing from within Forward-Looking Statements: This presentation includes certain estimates and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements with respect to anticipated operating and financial performance, clinical results, potential partnerships, licensing opportunities and other statements of expectation. Words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "assumes," "seeks," "estimates," "should" and variations of these words and similar expressions, are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. While we believe these statements are accurate, forward-l…

Slide 3

| & edgenics ~ healing from within Truly Personalized Medicine: = |nnovative med-tech company gavaloping sustained z protein arg las for chronic diseases utilizing proprietary “Biopump” technology. = “Biopump” provides for continuous protein production and delivery from patient's own skin. = Designed to be better, safer and cheaper, [eplacing scores of injections, in $130b protein market. = Potentially een major advantages in treating a wide range of chronic diseases starting with anemia, hepatitis and hemophilia. = Proof of concept shown in patients: 6 months to 3 years sustained treatment. (1) RNCOS—Global Protein Therapeutic Market Analysis (Ed. 3, May 2010) 3

Slide 4

© healing from within Experienced Management Team: Extensive experience in healthcare industry, founded, operated and led firms to M&A Board of Directors: SAB/Advisors: Management: | a Andrew L. Pearlman PhD Clinical & Regulatory: Andrew L. Pearlman PhD Pres/CEO >25yrs Biomed Allen Nissenson MD — past Pres. Founder President & CEO RPA, CMO DaVita Corp Clarence “Butch” Dellio Eugene Bauer MD, Exec Chm. pn.t516 Besarab MD — World Chief Operating Officer Former Dean, Stanford Med Sch, authority renal anaemia, Dir. RPA Xoma, Neosil Comic EE Stephen Fishbane MD- World geerton Bellomo MSc Isaac Blech-Biotech investor authority renal anaemia VP Product Development & Celgene, ICOS, Nova Bruce Bacon…

Slide 5

& edgenics healing from within Key Considerations: = Proprietary Biopump, an autologous tissue-based platform technology for the sustained production and delivery of therapeutic proteins. = 3lead ol address markets >$16B/yr in anemia, hepatitis and hemophilia. = EPODURE: Anemia/EPO - Completing Phase I/ll in Israel, cleared for Phase lla trial in dialysis patients in Israel commencing in Q2; IND cleared for Phase IIb in USA; = INFRADURE: Hepatitis/Interferon alpha — awaiting clearance of Phase I/ll trials in Israel to treat hepatitis-C in Q2; filed for Orphan Drug Designation in hepatitis D; and - = HEMODURE: Hemophilia/FVIll - being developed as a sustained Factor VIII therapy for the prop…

Slide 6

QMedgenics Lead Products healing from within = EPODURE (anemia) Sustained EPO therapy ($9.2B/yr market) could replace $15-30,000/yr/patient in injections, potentially offering: = Superior treatment at lower cost; 6-36+ months sustained EPO therapy - avoid peak overdose risks, improve compliance and reliability. x = Improved hemoglobin control, directly address current key issues in anemia: + FDA hemoglobin safety, CMS reimbursement bundling [ = INFRADURE (hepatitis) Sustained IFN-a therapy ($2.7B/yr mkt) could replace $35-85,000/yr/patient for current therapies, potentially offering: = Effective treatment with greatly increased compliance, reduced side effects — tolerable and safer, with un…

Slide text above is read directly from the Medgenics deck PDF embedded on this page.

Related fundraising guides (24)

Decks from the same year (1)

Decks from the same region (1)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database