Pace Oil and Gas Pitch Deck: 28-Slide Breakdown

See all 28 slides of the Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck, with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

Pace Oil and Gas provides a highly technical investor update from March 2012, positioning itself as an 'intermediate-sized real growth company.' The deck is characterized by an intense focus on operational metrics, specifically reserve replacement and the transition from natural gas to higher-margin oil and NGLs. With a 2012 CapEx budget of $90-$100 million, the company aims for production between 14,500 and 15,250 boe/d. The presentation relies heavily on geological maps, production decline curves, and detailed tables of Proved and Probable (2P) reserves. While it lacks a traditional 'proble…

Key takeaways

Executive Summary and Corporate Positioning

Slide 1: Title Slide

The cover slide establishes the company's identity as 'Pace Oil & Gas Ltd.' and sets a clear strategic tone with the tagline: 'An Intermediate-Sized Real Growth Company' and 'Oil Growth Drives Cash Flow.' The visual of a drilling rig reinforces the industrial nature of the business. The slide is dated March 2012 and references a 2011 Year End update.

Slide 4: Corporate Highlights

This slide provides a snapshot of the company's capital structure and reserve base as of December 31, 2011. Key figures include 47.2 million basic shares outstanding and 51.0 million fully diluted shares. The financial position shows $151 million in bank debt and $186 million in net debt, supported by a $275 million credit facility. The reserve data is critical for an energy company: 44.5 mmboe in Proved Reserves and 69.6 mmboe in 2P Reserves, with the latter being approximately 50% oil. The 2012 outlook forecasts production of 14,500 to 15,250 boe/d and a CapEx budget of $90 to $100 million.

Operational Performance and Efficiency

Slide 7: Pace Delivered Top Finding

This technical slide breaks down Finding, Development, and Acquisition (FD&A) costs. In 2011, Proved FD&A costs were $16.09/boe, an improvement over the 2010 figure of $17.81/boe. The slide highlights a major achievement in the footer: 'Pace replaced 268% of oil & NGLs proven production.' This indicates the company is adding reserves much faster than it is depleting them. The 2.1x recycle ratio on weighted average netback is a key metric for investors, suggesting high profitability per barrel found.

Slide 10: Increased Liquids Increases Netbacks/Cash Flow

Slide 10 uses three bar charts to compare Pace against its peers (identified by three-letter tickers like ZAR, NGL, CKE). The charts show a clear upward trend in the percentage of liquids in the production mix and a corresponding increase in operating netbacks. Most importantly, the bottom chart shows Pace leading its peer group in Cash Flow Per Share (CFPS) growth for the 2010/2011 period. This slide serves as the primary evidence that the 'Oil Growth' strategy is translating into financial outperformance.

Asset Portfolio and Growth Strategy

Slide 13: Significant Upside & Visible Long Term Growth Areas

This slide details the geographic distribution of assets across Alberta and British Columbia. It lists specific play types and their associated 2012 capital allocations. The Southern Alberta Glauconite/Lithic/Pekisko waterflood is the largest line item at $35-$40 million for 24 gross wells. The company emphasizes 'High Working Interest' and 'Operational Control,' which allows them to dictate the pace of development. The total 2012 plan involves 33 gross wells (27 net wells).

Slide 16: NNN & BBB Production Forecast

Focusing on the Retlaw Unit, this slide illustrates the impact of waterflood implementation. A production forecast graph shows a sharp decline in oil production (green line) being arrested and reversed by water injection (blue line). The 2012 plan for this specific area involves $5 million in net capital to add 400 bbl/d of production. The company claims a 52% Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for this project, demonstrating the high efficiency of secondary recovery in mature fields.

Slide 19: Peace River Arch - Red Earth Area

This slide provides a detailed land map of the Red Earth area, showing PACE locations (stars) and existing oil/gas wells. The key attributes listed include a total net acreage of 51,800 sections and a netback exceeding $60/boe. The 2012 plan for this region ($15-$20 million) involves drilling two horizontal wells and testing four others. This slide highlights the company's 'Top Quality light oil property' and the inventory of 50 wells.

Slide 22: Haro Pekisko Encouragement

Slide 22 focuses on a specific resource play with 'Unrisked 300 to 600 locations.' It provides a type curve for oil rates over 36 months and a table of economic metrics. The estimated NPV 10% per well is $2.0 - $2.4 million, with a rate of return between 35% and 75%. The netback for the first year is projected at $55 - $60/boe. This slide is intended to show the long-term 'runway' of the company's drilling inventory.

Enhanced Recovery and Conclusion

Slide 25: Pace Oil Enhanced Recovery

This is the most data-dense slide in the deck, featuring a table that calculates the 'Upside Potential' across various pools (Dixonville, Retlaw, etc.) using advanced recovery mechanisms like Polymer-SP and ASP. The 'Total Pace Upside' is calculated at 275.9 mmbbls. This slide quantifies the long-term value that can be unlocked from existing assets through technical expertise rather than just new exploration.

Slide 28: Contact Information

The final slide provides contact details for the executive team: Fred Woods (President & CEO), Judy Stripling (Executive VP & CFO), and Chad Kalmakoff (VP, Finance). It also lists the company's trading symbols on the TSX (PCE) and OTC (PACEF), confirming its status as a publicly traded entity at the time of the presentation.

What Pace Oil and Gas Does Well

The deck is exceptionally strong on technical validation. In the oil and gas sector, investors care about two things: reserves and the cost to extract them. Pace provides granular detail on both. By including third-party reserve evaluations (McDaniels & Associates) and detailed FD&A cost breakdowns, they build significant credibility. The use of decline curves and waterflood forecasts (Slide 16) provides a scientific basis for their growth claims, moving beyond mere speculation.

Furthermore, the peer benchmarking on Slide 10 is a masterclass in competitive positioning. Instead of just saying they are growing, they show they are growing faster than a dozen named competitors in the metrics that matter most to shareholders: cash flow and netbacks. This creates a sense of urgency and 'best-in-class' status.

What Is Missing from the Deck

The most notable omission is a comprehensive discussion of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. While this deck is from 2012, even then, regulatory hurdles and environmental liabilities associated with waterflooding and chemical injections (ASP/Polymer) were significant risks. There is no mention of abandonment and reclamation obligations (ARO), which are critical for mature assets.

Additionally, while the deck mentions a $275 million credit facility, it lacks a detailed debt maturity schedule. For a company with $186 million in net debt, understanding when those obligations come due is vital for assessing liquidity risk, especially in a volatile commodity price environment. The deck also assumes relatively high commodity prices ($95/bbl WTI) in its footnotes, but does not provide a sensitivity analysis showing how the economics change if oil prices drop.

What Founders Should Copy

Founders in capital-intensive or technical industries should emulate the 'Operational Control' narrative found on Slide 13. By emphasizing that they own the majority interest and operate the wells, Pace signals to investors that they are the masters of their own destiny and not subject to the whims of larger partners. This is a powerful way to frame a company's ability to execute its strategy.

The 'Recycle Ratio' concept (Slide 7) is also worth copying for any business with high customer acquisition or asset acquisition costs. It clearly demonstrates the relationship between the cost of acquiring a unit of value and the profit generated by that unit. Whether you are selling software or extracting oil, showing that your 'recycle' or 'LTV/CAC' ratio is superior to the industry average is the fastest way to win over sophisticated investors.

Frequently asked questions

What is the primary value proposition of Pace Oil and Gas?
The value proposition centers on 'Oil Growth Drives Cash Flow.' The company focuses on acquiring and developing assets with high working interest and operational control in Western Canada. By shifting their production mix toward liquids (oil and NGLs), they aim to achieve higher operating netbacks and top-tier cash flow per share growth compared to their peer group.
How does the company plan to use its 2012 capital expenditure?
Pace allocated a budget of $90 to $100 million for 2012. The majority of this ($75-$90 million) is directed toward oil programs. Key projects include the Southern Alberta waterflood ($35-$40 million), the Dixonville Montney C waterflood ($15-$20 million), and the Red Earth Slave Point play ($15-$20 million). The goal is to match CapEx to cash flow.
What technical methods are being used to increase production?
The deck emphasizes Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques. This includes traditional waterflooding, as well as more advanced methods like Polymer-SP (Surfactant-Polymer) and ASP (Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer) flooding. These methods are projected to significantly increase the Estimated Gross Ultimate Recovery (EUR) across their various pools, particularly in Dixonville and Retlaw.
How does Pace compare to its peers in terms of financial performance?
Slide 10 provides a comparative analysis showing Pace at the top of its peer group for Cash Flow Per Share (CFPS) growth from 2010 to 2011. It also shows a steady increase in liquids percentage and operating netbacks, moving from the middle of the pack toward the 'top tier' as they execute their oil-focused strategy.
What are the specific reserve figures mentioned in the deck?
As of the end of 2011, Pace reported 44.5 million barrels of oil equivalent (mmboe) in Proved Reserves and 69.6 mmboe in Proved plus Probable (2P) reserves. Notably, the 2P reserves are approximately 50% oil. The deck also highlights a total upside potential of 275.9 mmbbls through enhanced recovery programs.
Cover slide of the Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck, slide 1

Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck: the facts

Company
Pace Oil and Gas
Slides
28

Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck PDF

The full Pace Oil and Gas deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Pace Oil & Gas Ltd. pitch deck was used for

This deck is a 28‑slide investor update for Pace Oil & Gas Ltd., an intermediate‑sized, oil‑weighted E&P company operating in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, published on Slideshare with a March 2012 year‑end framing. It presents the company’s technical and financial profile at a time when Pace was positioning itself as a growth‑oriented producer transitioning toward higher‑margin liquids and emphasizing operational control across its Western Canadian assets. The deck appears to be part of a series of 2012 investor presentations (including Matziwin and GHS100 conference materials) used to communicate strategy and performance to public‑market investors and potential strategic partners prior to the late‑2012/2013 strategic alternatives and merger process.

Business model: Intermediate-sized, oil‑weighted exploration and production company focused on growth through oil and sweet natural gas development in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin.

Founded
2010-06-29
Headquarters
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Industry
Oil and gas exploration and production

What happened after the Pace Oil & Gas Ltd. deck

Pace Oil & Gas Ltd., formed in 2010 as a growth‑oriented, intermediate‑sized oil and gas producer in Western Canada, used 2012 investor presentations to communicate its strategy before engaging in a strategic alternatives process in October 2012 that led to stock‑for‑stock acquisitions of AvenEx Energy Corp. and Charger Energy Corp. and the creation of Spyglass Resources Corp. in early 2013, after

What the Pace Oil & Gas Ltd. deck got right

What could have been stronger

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Risks that stand out

Questions this deck invites

What founders can take from the Pace Oil & Gas Ltd. deck

Pace Oil & Gas Ltd. pitch deck: common questions

What kind of company was Pace Oil & Gas at the time of this investor presentation?

Pace Oil & Gas Ltd. was an intermediate‑sized, oil‑weighted exploration and production company operating in Alberta and the broader Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, focused on oil and sweet natural gas resource opportunities. It was formed on June 29, 2010 through the merger of Midnight Oil Exploration Ltd. and Provident Energy Trust’s upstream oil and natural gas production business.

What was Pace Oil & Gas’s corporate status and positioning when this deck was used?

At the time of the March 2012 year‑end investor update, Pace was a publicly listed Canadian E&P company (TSX:PCE) positioning itself as a growth‑oriented, intermediate‑sized oil‑weighted producer, using investor presentations like this deck and subsequent conference materials to communicate its strategy, asset base, and operating performance to shareholders and the market.

What strategy and themes does this Pace Oil & Gas investor deck focus on?

Pace’s investor presentations from 2012 emphasized near‑term oil resource opportunities and liquid‑weighted growth in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, aiming to demonstrate that oil growth would drive cash flow and support a “top‑tier energy company” strategy. The decks highlighted technical, data‑driven operational control and enhanced recovery approaches on assets such as Matziwin, along with capital program updates.

How does this investor presentation relate to Pace’s later merger into Spyglass Resources Corp.?

In October 2012, Pace engaged National Bank Financial to run a confidential strategic alternatives process that led to a merger with AvenEx Energy Corp. and Charger Energy Corp. to form Spyglass Resources Corp., with shareholders receiving an equity‑based premium to pre‑announcement trading prices. This deck predates those transactions and reflects Pace’s standalone growth narrative before the sale process and amalgamation were executed in late 2012 and early 2013.

What ultimately happened to Pace Oil & Gas after this period of investor presentations?

Pace Oil & Gas Ltd. completed the acquisition of AvenEx Energy Corp. and entered into an agreement to acquire Charger Energy Corp., with the three entities amalgamating to form Spyglass Resources Corp., which began trading on the TSX under the symbol SGL around April 2013. Following court and shareholder approval of the plan of arrangement, Pace ceased trading as a separate TSX entity and its operations were folded into Spyglass.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck slides

Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck slide 1 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck — slide 1 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck slide 2 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck — slide 2 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck slide 3 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck — slide 3 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck slide 4 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck — slide 4 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck slide 5 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck — slide 5 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck slide 6 of 28
Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck — slide 6 of 28

What each slide of the Pace Oil and Gas pitch deck says

Slide 2

Forward Looking Statements I; Forward-Looking Statements: This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements and forward-looking al information (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian Cro securities laws. All statements other than statements of present or historical fact are forward-looking statements. In some ill cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may", "wil", "should", "believes", "expects", [ids “intends”, "projects", "plans", "anticipates", “positions”, “potential”, “objective”, “continuous”, “ongoing”, "estimates" or I) "contains" or similar words or the negative ther…

Slide 3

pay 8 Corporate Overview v' Strong Real Growth = Top tier growth - oil weighted & cash flow per share v' Strong Performance Metrics = High quality, long life, oil weighted assets v' Significant Upside = Portfolio of top tier resource plays = Multiple valued-added visible growth opportunities = Significant upside potential/large scale catalysts Continued Strong (Real) Growth — Oil Weighted and Cash Flow per share will deliver multiple expansion

Slide 4

- i) Corporate Highlights Current — December 31, 2011 Basic Shares Outstanding (mm) 47.2 FD Shares Outstanding (mm) 51.0 Bank Debt (mm) $151 Net Debt (mm) $186 Credit Facility (mm) ( $275 Proved Reserves (mmboe) 44.5 2P Reserves (mmboe) 2 ~50% Oil 69.6 2012 Outlook 3) Est. Production (boe/d) 14,500 - 15,250 Oil & NGLs (bbls/d) 7,200 - 7,500 CapEx 2012 (mm) $90 - 100 3 Reserves December 31. 2011 evaluated by HeDanls & Assotates Conouants Lil 5. 595051 WI $3.00mel AECO

Slide 5

MH 3 ™ Oil Growth Drives Production Increase 16,000 —_— a Total production up wOiNGL (bbls/d) aaa 14262 14,208 : over 53% from Q1 14,000 13089 13,558 201 0 12,403 12.000 = Qil production up over 10,271 104% from Q1 2010 10,000 { 9.808 som = Oil production 3 r increased to 7,200 6,000 a= 1 I bbls/d YE 2011 exit 4560 ull = Target exit for 2012 Ta | 5,391 [fil 5:868 J 6.077 [if 6.061 Te 8,000 bbls/d EL] 3531 J 3.542 Fe = Strong oil growth TTS ae Tas as NN a aw ae (20%+ yly) drives ¢ F&F & F&F SF production growth Only 3% NGL in Oil Total Steady paced oil growth trend

Slide 6

it pay 8 Decreasing Op Costs & Increasing Op Netback Operating Costs/boe Operating Netbacks/boe $24.11 $24.18 Fr Fc id 520.40 17.24 J ad ~ iE 516.57 _~ yd 514.99 [575.20 pa y 0575.81 0513 510 573.20 f 513.38) 1 5 ) i a | ~~ Q110 Q210 ' Q310 ' Q410 ) Q111 Q21 ' Q3 11 ' Q411 Q110 Q210 Q310 Q410 Q111 Q211 Q311 Q411 30% op cost reduction while increased oil weighting to 50% Netback increasing in 2012

Slide text above is read directly from the Pace Oil and Gas deck PDF embedded on this page.

Related fundraising guides (24)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database