What is 'Biotransformation' according to the deck?

Biotransformation is Polymateria's proprietary technology that breaks down the crystalline and amorphous structures of plastic into a wax-like material. Unlike traditional degradable plastics that create microplastics, this process allows naturally occurring bacteria and fungi to fully consume the material, converting it into CO2, water, and biomass within a specific timeframe.

How does Polymateria's product integrate into existing manufacturing?

The technology is delivered as a 'drop-in Masterbatch' (MB). According to slide 9, it has a typical loading rate of just 2% by weight and is fully compatible with normal plastic conversion processes. This suggests that manufacturers do not need to overhaul their existing machinery to adopt Polymateria’s sustainable materials.

What are the two main product lines mentioned?

The company commercializes under two brands: Cycle+ and DegrAid. Cycle+ is designed for products with a long service life (6 months to 3 years) and maintains a viable recycling option. DegrAid is intended for short service life applications (less than 6 months) where recycling is not a viable option, such as sealant films.

Does the deck provide any information on the founders or leadership?

No. The 13-slide deck completely omits a team slide. While it mentions a 'multi-disciplinary team of researchers' and a partnership with Imperial College London on slide 2, it does not name any specific executives, founders, or board members, which is unusual for a later-stage fundraising deck.

What specific environmental standards does the technology meet?

The deck emphasizes compliance with several international standards. Specifically, it cites OECD 202 and 207 for no acute toxicity in water (Daphnia) and soil (Earthworms), and OECD 222 for no chronic toxicity. It also mentions meeting US GRAS standards for food contact and EU regulation 10/2011 for migration certification.

Polymateria Pitch Deck (2016): 13-Slide Breakdown

See all 13 slides of the Polymateria pitch deck — a 2016 Later deck — with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

Polymateria’s 13-slide deck is a highly technical, product-focused presentation that prioritizes scientific credibility over traditional business metrics. Founded in 2016 and based at Imperial College London, the company addresses 'fugitive plastic'—litter that escapes waste streams—through its proprietary 'Biotransformation' technology. The deck excels at explaining complex chemistry through clear visuals, such as the degradation timeline and the distinction between their tech and inferior 'fragmenters.' However, it is notably silent on commercial traction, financial projections, and the spe…

Key takeaways

The deck identifies a massive market problem: 32% of plastic packaging is 'fugitive' and 4 billion tonnes are estimated by 2050 (Slide 3).
Polymateria positions itself as the 'most credible and scalable' solution compared to industrial or home composting (Slide 5).
The technology uses a proprietary 'prebiotic' to attract microbes that consume wax-like plastic residues (Slide 6).
Scientific evidence is central, citing PE films fully biodegrading in 226 days and PP rigids in 336 days (Slide 6).
The product is a 'drop-in Masterbatch' with a typical loading rate of 2% weight percentage, making it compatible with existing manufacturing (Slide 9).
The company has achieved GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status for food contact in the US market (Slide 8).
The deck completely omits a team slide, financial data, competition analysis, and a specific funding ask.
Compliance with OECD 202, 207, and 222 standards is used to prove zero acute or chronic toxicity to soil and water (Slide 11).

The Science of Sustainability: A Technical Deep Dive

Polymateria’s pitch deck is a distinct departure from the typical 'problem-solution-traction' flow seen in SaaS pitches. Instead, this is a deep-tech presentation that treats scientific validation as its primary currency. Founded in 2016 and headquartered at the Imperial College Innovation I-Hub in London, Polymateria is tackling one of the most visible environmental crises: plastic pollution. The deck focuses almost exclusively on their 'Biotransformation' technology, which aims to solve the problem of 'fugitive plastics'—the 32% of plastic that escapes recycling and landfill streams to end up in the natural environment.

Slides 1-2: Introduction and Institutional Credibility

The deck opens with a clean, professional title slide introducing 'Biotransformation Next-Gen Biodegradation Technology.' Slide 2, 'About Us,' immediately establishes institutional credibility. Rather than listing founders, it highlights the company's location at Imperial College London and its 'multi-disciplinary team of researchers.' This positioning is strategic; it suggests the technology is born out of rigorous academic research rather than just a commercial venture. The mention of 'state-of-the-art R&D facilities' reinforces the idea that this is a capital-intensive, high-barrier-to-entry business.

Slides 3-5: Defining the Problem and the Landscape

Slide 3 uses a Sankey-style diagram to show the 'Global Flow of Plastic Packaging Waste 2015.' It highlights a critical gap: while 14% is collected for recycling, a staggering 32% is 'Fugitive.' The deck defines this as plastic leaked into the natural environment and warns of 4 billion tonnes of fugitive plastic by 2050. Slide 4 introduces the 'Fourth R: Redesign,' adding to the traditional 'Reduce, Reuse, Recycle' mantra. This is a clever framing that justifies the existence of a new material rather than just better waste management.

Slide 5, 'Understanding the Landscape,' is one of the most important slides in the deck. It categorizes end-states for plastics, placing 'The Fragmenters' (which create microplastics) and 'Landfill' at the bottom of the credibility scale. It positions 'Biotransformation' at the top as 'The Most Credible and Scalable Technology.' By doing this, Polymateria preemptively answers the investor question: 'How is this different from the biodegradable plastics that already failed?'

Slides 6-8: The Mechanics of Biotransformation

Slide 6 dives into the 'how.' It explains the unique ability to turn hard crystalline structures into a 'wax-like material,' which prevents the creation of microplastics. It introduces the concept of a 'prebiotic' used to attract microbes. Crucially, it provides the first hard data points: PE (polyethylene) films fully biodegrading in 226 days and PP (polypropylene) rigids in 336 days. These figures are attributed to '3rd party labs,' which is vital for investor trust.

Slide 7 uses a graph to show 'Physical Integrity' over time. It illustrates a 'Product defined service life' where the plastic remains 100% intact, followed by a rapid decline in integrity (cleaving polymer chains) and finally full assimilation by bacteria and fungi within 24 months. Slide 8 addresses safety, noting that all constituents are GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) for the US market and have passed migration certifications for the EU. This slide is intended to de-risk the product for food packaging applications.

Slides 9-11: Productization and Standards

Slide 9 explains the business model: a 'drop-in Masterbatch (MB).' This is a critical piece of the 'scalability' argument. By being a 2% weight additive that works with 'normal plastic conversion processes,' Polymateria avoids the need for manufacturers to buy new equipment. It also introduces the two brands: Cycle+ (long life, recyclable) and DegrAid (short life, non-recyclable).

Slides 10 and 11 focus on the 'Verification Process.' Slide 10 lists specific pass/fail criteria, such as 'Elongation at break ≤ 5%' and 'Carbonyl Index (CI) > 1.' Slide 11 uses images of Daphnia (water fleas) and earthworms to show compliance with OECD standards for toxicity. This level of technical detail is rare in a pitch deck but necessary for a company claiming to have solved a problem that has seen many 'greenwashed' failures in the past.

Slides 12-13: Real-World Applications

The final two slides show the technology in situ. Slide 12 focuses on 'Rigid Packaging' like detergent bottles, straws, and cups, noting they are the 'only company in the world to fully and safely biodegrade rigid PP applications in 336 days.' Slide 13 covers 'Flexibles' like bread bags and produce bags, citing a 226-day window for PE biodegradation. Both slides include graphs showing the biodegradation curve over time, providing a visual 'proof of life' for the technology.

What Works in This Deck

Scientific Rigor: The constant citation of third-party labs, OECD standards, and specific chemical indices (like Carbonyl Index) makes the claims feel verifiable rather than aspirational. · Clear Categorization: Slide 5 effectively 'buckets' the competition, making Polymateria look like the only logical choice in a sea of inferior solutions. · Manufacturing Compatibility: The 'drop-in Masterbatch' explanation on Slide 9 removes a major hurdle for adoption—the cost of switching manufacturing processes. · Visualizing the Invisible: The use of graphs to show the 'cleaving' of polymer chains and the subsequent biodegradation timeline helps non-scientists understand a complex chemical process.

What is Missing

The Team: There is no team slide. In a $15M later-stage round, investors need to know who is leading the company, their backgrounds, and their ability to execute commercially. · Commercial Traction: While the deck shows product applications, it doesn't mention any pilot programs, signed contracts, or revenue. We don't know if any major brands are actually using Cycle+ or DegrAid. · The Ask: There is no slide detailing how much money is being raised or how the funds will be used. · Competition: While it categorizes 'types' of competitors, it doesn't name specific companies or explain how Polymateria's IP (Intellectual Property) is protected against them. · Financials: There are no projections, unit economics, or historical burn rates.

What a Founder Should Copy

The 'Landscape' Slide: If you are in a crowded or misunderstood sector, use a slide like Slide 5 to define the categories of solutions and place yourself at the top based on specific criteria (credibility and scalability). · Third-Party Validation: Don't just say your product works; cite the specific international standards (ISO, OECD, ASTM) it meets. · Problem Definition: The use of the term 'Fugitive Plastic' is excellent branding. It gives a name to a specific, underserved part of a larger problem, making the solution feel more targeted. · Integration Clarity: Clearly explaining how your product fits into an existing supply chain (the 'drop-in' masterbatch) is the best way to overcome 'switching cost' objections.

Frequently asked questions

What is 'Biotransformation' according to the deck?: Biotransformation is Polymateria's proprietary technology that breaks down the crystalline and amorphous structures of plastic into a wax-like material. Unlike traditional degradable plastics that create microplastics, this process allows naturally occurring bacteria and fungi to fully consume the material, converting it into CO2, water, and biomass within a specific timeframe.
How does Polymateria's product integrate into existing manufacturing?: The technology is delivered as a 'drop-in Masterbatch' (MB). According to slide 9, it has a typical loading rate of just 2% by weight and is fully compatible with normal plastic conversion processes. This suggests that manufacturers do not need to overhaul their existing machinery to adopt Polymateria’s sustainable materials.
What are the two main product lines mentioned?: The company commercializes under two brands: Cycle+ and DegrAid. Cycle+ is designed for products with a long service life (6 months to 3 years) and maintains a viable recycling option. DegrAid is intended for short service life applications (less than 6 months) where recycling is not a viable option, such as sealant films.
Does the deck provide any information on the founders or leadership?: No. The 13-slide deck completely omits a team slide. While it mentions a 'multi-disciplinary team of researchers' and a partnership with Imperial College London on slide 2, it does not name any specific executives, founders, or board members, which is unusual for a later-stage fundraising deck.
What specific environmental standards does the technology meet?: The deck emphasizes compliance with several international standards. Specifically, it cites OECD 202 and 207 for no acute toxicity in water (Daphnia) and soil (Earthworms), and OECD 222 for no chronic toxicity. It also mentions meeting US GRAS standards for food contact and EU regulation 10/2011 for migration certification.

Cover slide of the Polymateria pitch deck — Later 2016 — Polymateria pitch deck, slide 1 (2016)

Polymateria pitch deck: the facts

Company: Polymateria
Year: 2016
Stage: Later
Slides: 13
Sector: Sustainability / Materials Science
Deck type: Technical / Product Pitch
Outcome: $15,000,000 raised
Headquarters: London, UK

Polymateria pitch deck PDF

The full Polymateria deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Polymateria pitch deck was used for

This pitch deck is from Polymateria, a London-based biodegradable plastics technology company, and is listed as a 2016, later-stage deck with 13 slides focused on sustainability and materials science. The deck presents Polymateria’s ‘biotransformation’ masterbatch technology that enables conventional plastics to break down into bio-compatible residues instead of microplastics, while remaining food-safe and recyclable during use life, as suggested by slides describing tailored masterbatches, ecotoxicity testing and GRAS status. The deck appears to be for an early venture round (around 2015–2016) used to fund development and early commercialisation of its Imperial College-derived technology prior to larger rounds such as the 2020 Planet First Partners investment and the 2023 Series B.

Business model: Develops and commercialises additive masterbatch ‘biotransformation’ technology that makes conventional plastics biodegradable if they escape into the environment, while remaining compatible with existing plastic manufacturing and recycling processes.

Investors: Planet First Partners (later 2020 round; no specific 2016 investor list is fully disclosed in public sources).
Founded: 2016
Industry: Biodegradable plastics / materials science / cleantech.

Round: Early-stage venture capital around 2015–2016; specific classification of the round linked to this deck (e.g., seed vs Series A) is not explicitly disclosed in publicly available sources, though databases indicate early-stage VC rounds in December 2015 and August 2016.

Year: 2016 (based on the deck metadata and early-stage VC activity reported for Polymateria in 2015–2016).

Headquarters: London, United Kingdom (Imperial College London White City Campus / Translation & Innovation Hub).

Total funding: Polymateria has raised on the order of tens of millions of pounds; public announcements include a £15m investment from Planet First Partners in 2020 and a £20m Series B round in 2023 led by ABC Impact and Indorama Ventures.

What happened after the Polymateria deck

Since the time of this 2016-era deck, Polymateria has progressed from early-stage development to a well-funded scale-up, securing major investments (including a £15m round in 2020 and a £20m Series B in 2023) and a near $100m commercial agreement, and continues to operate as an active player in biodegradable plastics and materials science.

Polymateria secured a £15m investment from Planet First Partners announced in July 2020 to scale its biotransformation t
The company later raised a £20m Series B round in 2023 led by ABC Impact and Indorama Ventures, aimed at accelerating gl
In 2021, Polymateria signed an agreement worth nearly $100m with Formosa Plastics to deploy its biodegradable plastic te

What the Polymateria deck got right

Clear, science-based differentiation in degradation mechanism. Slide 7 describes a three-stage degradation pathway—dormant during use and recycling, rapid loss of physical integrity via polymer chain cleavage without microplastic formation, and subsequent colonisation and digestion by naturally occurring bacteria and fungi into bio-compatible residues—providing a clear and differentiated technical story compared with generic ‘biodegradable’ claims.
Strong focus on safety, regulatory and third-party validation. Slide 8 emphasises that masterbatch constituents are GRAS for North American purposes, that EU migration certification was conducted by a third-party lab, and that degraded materials were independently tested for acute and chronic ecotoxicology, demonstrating a strong emphasis on regulatory compliance and third-party validation.
Drop-in solution compatible with existing plastic processing. Slide 9 frames the product as a drop-in masterbatch that is compatible with normal plastic conversion processes, with a typical loading rate of about 2% by weight, which reduces friction for manufacturers and suggests that existing production lines can be used without major capex changes.
Platform potential across multiple resins and branded product lines. The deck notes that each masterbatch is tailored to the resin and application profile and that products are commercialised under two brands, signalling a platform approach that can be extended to multiple resin types and markets rather than a single niche product.
Direct targeting of microplastics and environmental impact reduction. By highlighting that the material avoids microplastic formation and ends as low-molecular, hydrophobic, bio-compatible residues capable of full assimilation, the deck directly addresses one of the most controversial aspects of plastic degradation—microplastic pollution—positioning Polymateria as a solution to a high-salience environmental problem.
Credible, science-led positioning against greenwashing. The combination of detailed degradation science and explicit mention of ecotoxicology and food safety positions Polymateria as a serious, science-led company rather than a marketing-led ‘green’ brand, which can resonate strongly with investors wary of greenwashing in plastics and packaging.

What could have been stronger

Limited visible commercial traction or customer evidence. From the OCR text, the deck devotes substantial space to explaining degradation mechanisms, GRAS status and ecotoxicology, but there is no visible detail on commercial traction such as paying customers, pilot deployments, or revenue, leaving investors without clear evidence of market validation beyond technical readiness.
Lack of cost and economics detail. Slides 7–9 focus on technical mechanisms (prebiotic additives, polymer chain cleavage, masterbatch loading rates) without any visible unit economics or cost comparisons versus incumbent plastics or competing biodegradable solutions, making it hard to assess economic viability from the deck excerpts.
Potentially dense and technical communication style. The OCR shows heavy technical language with some typographical noise (e.g., “matena-”, “DegrAid”, “MB iprint”), suggesting that the slides may be dense and potentially hard for non-technical investors to parse; if other slides follow this pattern, the narrative may be less accessible to generalist investors.
Unclear degradation timelines and field performance in the deck excerpts. While the deck stresses avoidance of microplastics and full assimilation into the environment, the OCR snippets do not show explicit timeframes for degradation in real-world conditions or performance across different climates and environments, which are critical parameters for assessing real impact.

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Clear articulation of a **drop-in masterbatch** that is compatible with existing plastic processing, with typical loading of about 2% by weight, which can lower adoption friction for converters and brand owners.
Strong emphasis on **third-party safety and environmental testing**, including GRAS status, EU migration certification, and independent acute and chronic ecotoxicology clearance, which directly addresses regulatory and greenwashing concerns.
Technical differentiation via the **three-step degradation pathway**: dormant during use and recycling, rapid loss of physical integrity via polymer chain cleavage without microplastics, and final digestion by naturally occurring bacteria and fungi into bio-compatible residues.
Positioning as a platform technology commercialised under multiple brands, suggesting scope for product-line expansion across different resins and applications.

Risks that stand out

Execution risk in scaling production and ensuring consistent performance across many resin types and applications, given that each masterbatch must be tailored to specific processing conditions and use-life requirements.
Market and regulatory risk if standards or regulations evolve in a way that favours alternative solutions (e.g., compostable plastics, reuse systems) or restricts certain additives, potentially limiting adoption of Polymateria’s approach.
Scientific and reputational risk if long-term field data were to show incomplete degradation or unforeseen ecotoxicity in certain environments, despite early lab and ecotoxicology tests indicating safety.
Commercial risk arising from the need to convince both converters and major brands to change formulations at scale, while maintaining cost competitiveness versus conventional plastics and other ‘green’ alternatives.

Questions this deck invites

What specific regulatory approvals or certifications (e.g., EFSA, FDA letters, national standards) has Polymateria obtained for its masterbatch products in key markets, beyond the GRAS and “migration certification” references in the deck?
Which resin types (e.g., PE, PP, PET) and specific packaging formats had fully validated formulations at the time of this deck, and what performance trade-offs (mechanical properties, shelf life) were observed relative to standard grades?
What were the real-world degradation timelines under varying conditions (land-based litter, marine environments, landfills), and how were these tested (test protocols, standards, third-party labs)?
What early customer pilots, joint development agreements, or supply contracts were in place around 2016, and what volumes or revenue did they represent?
How does Polymateria’s IP position (patents on masterbatch formulations and degradation pathways) compare to competing biodegradable and oxo-degradable technologies, and what is the risk of workarounds or competing standards?.

What founders can take from the Polymateria deck

Deep-tech climate and materials companies can build investor trust by foregrounding **third-party validation and international standards** (e.g., GRAS status, independent migration and ecotoxicology tests) rather than relying solely on internal test data, directly countering concerns about greenwash
Explaining a complex technology through a **clear process narrative**—dormant during use, rapid physical breakdown without microplastics, and biological assimilation—helps investors understand both how the product works and why it is differentiated.
Positioning the innovation as a **drop-in solution compatible with existing manufacturing processes**, with explicit details such as loading rates and compatibility with normal plastic conversion, can ease concerns about adoption friction.
Branding different formulations under **distinct commercial brands** while still emphasising a common core technology can signal scalability and product strategy even in a technical pitch.
Including explicit details about **food and ecotoxic safety** (GRAS constituents, EU migration certification, acute and chronic toxicity clearance) demonstrates an understanding of regulatory hurdles and provides concrete evidence that safety has been addressed.
Even for a science-heavy startup, over-reliance on dense technical language without parallel emphasis on customers, economics and market milestones can leave gaps for investors; balancing technical proof with commercial storytelling is critical, especially in later-stage decks.

Polymateria pitch deck: common questions

What does Polymateria do?

Polymateria is a London-based materials science company developing ‘biotransformation’ additives (masterbatches) that make conventional plastics like packaging fully biodegradable if they escape into the natural environment, while staying functional and recyclable during their intended use life.

When and where was Polymateria founded?

Polymateria was founded in 2016 and emerged from scientific work at Imperial College London, initially based at the Imperial White City Incubator before moving to the nearby Translation & Innovation Hub (I-HUB).

Who has invested in Polymateria so far?

Publicly reported investors include Planet First Partners, which invested £15m in 2020, and a 2023 Series B led by impact fund ABC Impact and chemical company Indorama Ventures; earlier rounds involved university-linked investors such as Milltrust’s British Innovation Fund, but specific investors in the 2016-era round for this deck are not fully disclosed in public sources.

How much did Polymateria raise with this particular pitch deck?

Available public information highlights a £15m funding round announced in July 2020 and a £20m Series B in 2023, but it does not clearly break out the exact amount raised or valuation for the specific 2016-era round associated with this deck; only that Polymateria had already begun raising early-stage venture capital from 2015–2016.

How does the Polymateria deck address safety and regulatory concerns?

The deck heavily emphasises third-party validation: it references GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status for masterbatch constituents, independent migration certification for EU food-contact use, and independent ecotoxicology testing on degraded materials to show clearance of acute and chronic toxicity issues. This framing aligns with later public claims that Polymateria meets food and environmental safety standards in multiple jurisdictions.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

Polymateria pitch deck slides

Polymateria pitch deck slide 1 of 13 — Polymateria pitch deck — slide 1 of 13

Polymateria pitch deck slide 2 of 13 — Polymateria pitch deck — slide 2 of 13

Polymateria pitch deck slide 3 of 13 — Polymateria pitch deck — slide 3 of 13

Polymateria pitch deck slide 4 of 13 — Polymateria pitch deck — slide 4 of 13

Polymateria pitch deck slide 5 of 13 — Polymateria pitch deck — slide 5 of 13

Polymateria pitch deck slide 6 of 13 — Polymateria pitch deck — slide 6 of 13

What each slide of the Polymateria pitch deck says

Slide 3

- v | GLOBAL FLOW OF PLASTIC PACKAGING WASTE 2015. Poly go *e os materia.- Lanctiled | | THE PROBLEM & 14% Inceoerabon OUR SOLUTION ¥ Energy recovery / a ( yd mo (3) Fugitive plastic iiersd plastic or plastic leaked cut of waste | ( ( \ collection system into the natural emironmesnt \ \ \ \ AAT x > e } 14% (4 billion tonnes of fugite plastic estimated by 2050, Disposed Total (® 80% of plastic found in the ocean which stemmed from 86% packaging unmanaged waste on land. \ waste - 141 MT 4 ! rem “T

Slide 4

“Poly = 3 materia;* POLYMATERIA ~ 3 a OUR PURPOSE & BUSINESS es . 74 a AT A GLANCE La) Nn (EES F - § NE (3 Our purpose is advancing saence 16 help nature deal wath a We " RB plastic politic i - . “8 4 y @ Biotransformaticn is a credible and scalable solution for the y . - fugitive plastic problem. ful & safe biodegradation, without & impacting recychng % (3 We therefore fully support the circular economy and the theee- ) Rs (reduce. reuse. recycle) but through our innovative new Biotransformation technology have also embraced a fourth | I Fi redesign wrap Lewielon impact solutions (m) bsi. id my Ee. =

Slide 5

END STATES OF PLASTICS: materia; UNDERSTANDING THE We LANDSCAPE (Bio) degradation of Polymers @ GVENTERS ANF INDUSTRIAL COMPOSTING HOME COMPOSTING BIOTRANSFORMATION

Slide 6

¥ BIOTRANIFORMATION t re ; WHERE THE ISSUE IS BIGGEST WE, TT. Br | AND SCALE IS POSSIBLE | Y 3 Cats, (3) Unique andity to Biotransform the hard crystalline and amorphous \ 4 — stricture into a wa like material hence no microplastic A wi) (3) Proprietary use of "preblotic” to attract microbes. funghi and GN Od a bacteria to fully consume the wax lke material A rw (3 Time controfiad aspect to allow foe recycling and unique lL) Cy 1) “Recycle By Date” to empower consumers LY A 9g. Polymateria is. the only company in the word who @ Oty dectiplogy wn the world that has proven full biodegradation has the breath and depth of evidence via credible of Polyalefins (Water, CO, and Biomass) on a range…

Slide 7

matena- : GIVING RECYCLING EVERY CHANCE (T Packaging service ife can be uniquely set. so that its dormant during use life, retans all its functionalities and also gives recycling every chance (o happen. (@} The packaging rapidly loses its physical integrity as the polymer chains are rapidly cieaved into much smaller molecules across both the amaorphous and crystalline structure of the plastic materal. avoiding microplastic. (3) Through cur unique "prebiotics" natutally ccosring bactena and fung: colonize. eat and digest the molecules. It is now not a plastic amymore but bio-compatible ressdues whose very lorww molecular size and hydrophibic nature makes it possible for full assimilation

Slide 8

Poly . - rRoOUCTS: matera;- Food & Ecotox Safe kbl stituents of the Masterbatch are GRAS for N American purposes. figration Certification performed by 3™ Party Laboratory for EU purposes Degraded materials mdependently tested for Acute and Chronic clearance of Ecotoxicology issues No Mic MICrs woavailable material for d and the inert plastic polymer 5 comerted ink GRAS statement v fication oxicity declaration

Slide 9

Cycle* and DegrAid Formulated as a drop-in Masterbatch (MB) iprint, appication profile and requared use hife, (2) Each MB s tadored to the resin's & Cormpatible with the normal plastic conversion processes (3) Typical loading rate: 2% wesght percentage (vA%) Commercialsed under two brands

Slide text above is read directly from the Polymateria deck PDF embedded on this page.