What is the core product of Ggw timebank?

Ggw timebank is a digital platform designed to facilitate time-banking, where community members exchange services for time credits. The interface, shown on Slide 3, resembles a social network where users like 'Jack' or 'Rohana' post requests for help with gardening or music lessons. It includes a 'Local Skills Map' to visualize community resources and a gratitude system where users can publicly acknowledge and pay forward hours to others.

What traction does the deck demonstrate?

The deck highlights two primary forms of traction. First, it notes a second-place finish at the 2013 Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington (Slide 2). Second, Slide 5 displays an 'Open Data' dashboard showing 68,605 total visits and 8,712 new visits over a specific period, suggesting the platform or a related landing page had achieved significant early traffic.

Who is the lead for the Ggw timebank project?

The contact slide (Slide 8) identifies Miles Thompson as the primary point of contact. He is associated with the email miles@goodgoodwonderful.org and the social media handle @utunga. The slide also lists two URLs: goodgoodwonderful.org and thankful.as, indicating the project operates under the 'Good Good Wonderful' brand umbrella.

How does the platform match users with tasks?

Slide 4 illustrates a 'Skills Match' feature. The system generates automated notifications when a community member's request aligns with another user's pre-defined skills. For example, the mockup shows a notification for a user who can help with a 'garden mulcher' for a 'working bee on Saturday,' demonstrating a proactive approach to connecting supply and demand within the time bank.

What is the design philosophy of the team?

According to Slide 7, the team follows a four-step 'Design Centric' process: 1) Understand and empathize with real people and problems; 2) Design the experience around those motivations; 3) Design the interface and graphical presentation; and 4) Iterate by taking things away. This suggests a user-experience-first approach rather than a technology-led or profit-led development cycle.

Ggw timebank Pitch Deck (2013): 29-Slide Breakdown

See all 29 slides of the Ggw timebank pitch deck — a 2013 deck — with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

Ggw timebank (Good Good Wonderful) is a social enterprise project that emerged from the first Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington, 2013, where it secured second place. The pitch deck focuses heavily on the philosophical and design-centric approach to building a community-based time-banking platform. Rather than traditional market size or revenue projections, the slides showcase user interface mockups, a 'Skills Match' notification system, and a commitment to open data. The project aims to facilitate the exchange of services—such as gardening or piano lessons—using time as a curren…

Key takeaways

The company placed second at the first Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington in 2013 (Slide 2).
The platform features a social-media-style feed where users can post requests, such as gardening help or piano lessons (Slide 3).
A 'Skills Match' notification system proactively alerts users when a request aligns with their registered abilities (Slide 4).
The project emphasizes 'Open Data,' displaying a Google Analytics dashboard with 68,605 visits and a 12.70% new visit rate (Slide 5).
The development philosophy is strictly 'Design Centric,' prioritizing empathy for real people and iterative simplification (Slide 7).
The platform integrates existing local time banks, specifically mentioning Kapiti Time Bank and Lyttelton TimeBank (Slide 3).
The deck includes a hand-drawn risk/reward matrix mapping features like 'social integration' and 'balance algorithm' (Slide 10).
There is no mention of a business model, revenue streams, or a specific funding request in the provided slides.

Ggw timebank: A Social Enterprise Teardown

The Ggw timebank pitch deck is a product of the 2013 Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington. It represents a specific era of social entrepreneurship where the focus was on 'refactoring the crappy world economy' through community-led initiatives and digital gratitude platforms. The deck is less of a financial pitch and more of a product vision and values statement.

Slide 1: Title Slide

The opening slide features the branding 'good good wonderful' with the tagline 'Do good, Be Thankful.' The imagery is soft-focus floral, establishing a tone that is community-oriented and aspirational rather than corporate. It immediately signals that the project is a social enterprise.

Slide 2: About Us and Validation

This slide serves as the 'Social Proof' section. It features a quote from Dave Moskowitz, who praises the company as a 'total standout' with a shot at 'refactoring the crappy world economy.' Crucially, it notes that the project was the 'Second place winner' at the first Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington, 2013. A humorous note at the bottom, 'Hey we won a phone!', adds a personal, grassroots touch to the narrative.

Slide 3: Platform Interface Mockup

Slide 3 provides a comprehensive look at the proposed user interface. The design is clean and modular, featuring three columns:

Left Column: User profile ('Shelly'), skill badges, and a 'Balance' pie chart. It also shows 'Acknowledgments'—public thank-you notes that include hours to 'pay forward.' · Center Column: A social feed showing activity. Examples include Jack requesting help for a 'working bee' and Alex paying Mona 2 hours for 'helping with the car.' · Right Column: A 'Local Skills Map' showing the geographic distribution of skills in Titahi Bay and links to existing time banks like Kapiti and Lyttelton.

Slide 4: Notifications and Skills Match

This slide zooms in on the 'Skills Match' functionality. It shows a popup notification: 'Jack has posted a request that matches your skills.' This indicates that the platform isn't just a passive bulletin board but an active matching engine designed to reduce the friction of finding relevant tasks within a community.

Slide 5: Open Data and Traction

Labeled 'Open Data,' this slide displays a Google Analytics dashboard. It shows 68,605 total visits, 8,712 new visits, and a bounce rate of 33.31%. The average visit duration is listed at 6 minutes and 22 seconds. By sharing these metrics openly, the founders demonstrate a commitment to transparency, a core value in many social enterprises.

Slide 6: The Project Transition

A simple transition slide titled 'The project' with the subtitle 'The team and values.' It marks the shift from what the product does to how the team thinks and operates.

Slide 7: Design Centric Philosophy

This slide outlines the team's methodology. It emphasizes empathy for 'real people and real problems' as the first step. The fourth point, 'Take stuff away and keep iterating,' suggests a lean development approach focused on simplicity and user experience over feature bloat.

Slide 8: Contact Information

The contact slide lists Miles Thompson as the lead. It provides two domains (.org and .as), an email address, and social media handles. The inclusion of a phone number and Skype ID reflects the communication norms of the early 2010s.

Slide 9: Mobile Vision

This slide shows a hand-drawn mobile phone frame containing a photo of a tree with the prompt: 'Why are you thankful for today?' This suggests a mobile app component focused on daily gratitude, likely intended to drive daily active usage and reinforce the 'thankful' brand identity.

Slide 10: Risk and Feature Mapping

The final slide in this set is a hand-drawn matrix. The vertical axis ranges from 'low risk' to 'high risk,' and the horizontal axis appears to track 'known' vs 'unknown' (though the left side is cut off). Items like 'social integration' and 'community news feed' are marked as high risk, while 'reminders' are lower risk. Below the matrix, there is a flow chart connecting 'empowerment' to 'public acknowledgment' and 'image motivation' to 'celebration of good things.' This slide provides a raw look at the team's internal strategic planning.

What Works in This Deck

Clear Product Vision: The mockups on Slide 3 and 4 are excellent. They don't just tell the reader what a time bank is; they show exactly how a user would interact with it. The inclusion of specific names and tasks (gardening, piano lessons) makes the concept tangible.

Strong Values Alignment: For a social enterprise, the 'Design Centric' and 'Open Data' slides are highly effective. They signal to potential partners or impact investors that the team is principled and transparent.

Early Validation: Winning second place at a Startup Weekend is a significant milestone for a pre-seed project. It proves that the idea resonated with judges and mentors in a competitive environment.

What Is Missing from This Deck

Business Model: There is no mention of how the project sustains itself. While it is a social enterprise, even non-profits or B-Corps need a revenue model (grants, transaction fees, or subscriptions) to survive. The deck is silent on this.

The 'Ask': A standard pitch deck usually ends with a request for funding, partnerships, or talent. This deck ends with contact info but no specific call to action regarding what the team needs to move to the next stage.

Market Size and Competition: There is no analysis of the broader time-banking market or how Ggw timebank differs from existing platforms like TimeRepublik or local manual time banks. While it mentions Lyttelton and Kapiti, it treats them as partners rather than analyzing the competitive landscape.

Team Bios: While Miles Thompson is listed as a contact, there are no details on his background or the skills of the broader team. Investors typically want to know why this specific team is qualified to build this specific solution.

Founder's Takeaway: What to Copy

Use High-Fidelity Mockups: If your product is a platform, follow Ggw's lead on Slide 3. Showing a 'live' feed with realistic data helps the audience visualize the community you are trying to build.

Map Your Risks: The hand-drawn matrix on Slide 10 is a great exercise. Even if you clean it up for the final deck, showing that you have thought about which features are 'high risk' or 'unknown' demonstrates a level of strategic maturity that many early-stage founders lack.

Leverage Social Proof: If you have won an award or received a strong testimonial from a recognized industry figure, put it front and center. The quote from Dave Moskowitz on Slide 2 does a lot of heavy lifting in establishing the project's potential importance.

Frequently asked questions

What is the core product of Ggw timebank?: Ggw timebank is a digital platform designed to facilitate time-banking, where community members exchange services for time credits. The interface, shown on Slide 3, resembles a social network where users like 'Jack' or 'Rohana' post requests for help with gardening or music lessons. It includes a 'Local Skills Map' to visualize community resources and a gratitude system where users can publicly acknowledge and pay forward hours to others.
What traction does the deck demonstrate?: The deck highlights two primary forms of traction. First, it notes a second-place finish at the 2013 Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington (Slide 2). Second, Slide 5 displays an 'Open Data' dashboard showing 68,605 total visits and 8,712 new visits over a specific period, suggesting the platform or a related landing page had achieved significant early traffic.
Who is the lead for the Ggw timebank project?: The contact slide (Slide 8) identifies Miles Thompson as the primary point of contact. He is associated with the email miles@goodgoodwonderful.org and the social media handle @utunga. The slide also lists two URLs: goodgoodwonderful.org and thankful.as, indicating the project operates under the 'Good Good Wonderful' brand umbrella.
How does the platform match users with tasks?: Slide 4 illustrates a 'Skills Match' feature. The system generates automated notifications when a community member's request aligns with another user's pre-defined skills. For example, the mockup shows a notification for a user who can help with a 'garden mulcher' for a 'working bee on Saturday,' demonstrating a proactive approach to connecting supply and demand within the time bank.
What is the design philosophy of the team?: According to Slide 7, the team follows a four-step 'Design Centric' process: 1) Understand and empathize with real people and problems; 2) Design the experience around those motivations; 3) Design the interface and graphical presentation; and 4) Iterate by taking things away. This suggests a user-experience-first approach rather than a technology-led or profit-led development cycle.

Cover slide of the Ggw timebank pitch deck — 2013 — Ggw timebank pitch deck, slide 1 (2013)

Ggw timebank pitch deck: the facts

Company: Ggw timebank
Year: 2013
Stage: Early Stage / Startup Weekend Project
Slides: 29
Sector: Social Enterprise / Time-banking
Deck type: Product Vision / Competition Pitch
Outcome: Second place at Social Enterprise Startup Weekend Wellington
Headquarters: Wellington, New Zealand

Ggw timebank pitch deck PDF

The full Ggw timebank deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Ggw timebank pitch deck was used for

Ggw timebank is a 2013 early-stage Startup Weekend social enterprise project proposing a digital time-banking and skills-sharing platform, presented in a 29-slide pitch deck hosted on SlideShare. The deck outlines a vision for a “good good wonderful” world by refactoring the economy through time-banking, with a common activity feed, notifications and skills matching to foster reciprocity and community gratitude. It emphasizes open-source development, deep transparency, and financially self-sustaining institutions rather than charity, and references a minimum viable product website with plans for a fuller platform and crowdfunding in 2014. The project was a second-place winner at the first Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington in 2013, indicating it was still at a concept/prototype stage rather than a formal institutional fundraise.

What the Ggw timebank deck got right

Clear and values-driven social mission. The deck articulates a compelling social mission to value undervalued, underappreciated, and underpaid members of society through time-banking, explicitly critiquing debt-based banking and unsustainable growth and offering a positive alternative focused on community reciprocity and gratitude.
Concrete and thoughtfully designed product concept. Ggw timebank proposes specific product features—such as a common activity feed, gratitude and notifications, skills mapping, and open data sharing—that make the time-banking concept concrete and demonstrate thoughtful UX design for community engagement.
Strong alignment between mission, governance, and technology. The project emphasizes building a deeply transparent, open-source organization and financially self-sustaining institutions, aligning governance, technology, and business model with its social enterprise values.
External validation from Startup Weekend recognition. Winning second place at the first Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington in 2013, with a strong endorsement quote from Startup Weekend organiser Dave Moskowitz, provides external validation of the team’s vision and the perceived importance of their work.
Evidence of early execution with an MVP and roadmap. The deck notes that an MVP website was already live at the time and that there were plans to launch a full platform in 2014 with crowdfunding, which suggests the team had moved beyond ideation into early execution.
Potential for scalable impact as shared infrastructure. By positioning itself as shared infrastructure for multiple timebanks rather than a single local initiative, Ggw timebank implicitly targets scalability and network effects, which can be attractive to funders looking for leveraged impact.

What could have been stronger

No clear fundraising ask or financial plan. The deck does not clearly specify a concrete fundraising ask (amount, instrument, and use of proceeds), instead focusing on vision and future plans like a 2014 platform launch and crowdfunding without a defined capital plan or financial model. This makes it difficult for investors to understand how much capital is needed, what milestones it will fund, and what the financial sustainability pathway looks like.
Lack of validated traction or adoption data. Although the deck emphasizes transparency, open-source tools, and community impact, it does not provide evidence of user traction, partner timebanks, or pilot metrics beyond mentioning an MVP site and sample activity feed content. Without verified numbers of users, exchanges, or partner organizations, investors cannot assess adoption risk or product-market fit.
Unclear revenue and sustainability model. The deck critiques debt-based banking and argues for systemic economic change but only briefly addresses how the time-banking platform will generate enough revenue (e.g., via SaaS fees to timebanks, support services, or donations) to be financially self-sustaining while remaining accessible to communities. This leaves a gap in understanding the long-term sustainability and scalability of the business model.
Limited detail on product roadmap and technology. While the pitch references an MVP, sample UX elements (activity feed, notifications, skills match), and target launch timelines, it does not outline a step-by-step product roadmap, technical architecture, or key milestones between MVP and full platform launch. For a tool intended as critical infrastructure for timebanks, more detail on security, data governance, and roadmap would reassure investors.
Broad, diffuse target market definition. The deck highlights a broad macro critique of the existing economy and a general intention to support timebanks but does not clearly define a focused initial target segment, such as specific regions, existing timebank organizations, or a particular type of community. This lack of focus could make go-to-market execution and early traction more challenging.

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

The deck presents a compelling **social mission** focused on valuing undervalued members of society and challenging debt-based economic systems, which is likely to appeal to impact investors and social enterprise funds.
It proposes building shared **time-banking software infrastructure** (activity feed, notifications, skills mapping, open data sharing) that could be reused by many communities, suggesting potential for leverage and network effects if adoption occurs.
The emphasis on **open-source, transparent, and community-governed** institutions signals a governance model aligned with many philanthropic and civic-tech funders’ values.
An MVP website was reportedly live at the time of the deck, with plans for a 2014 launch and crowdfunding, indicating at least some early execution beyond a pure idea.
Recognition as **second place at the first Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington in 2013**, with praise from a known Startup Weekend organiser, provides some external validation of the concept and team.

Risks that stand out

There is no externally verified evidence from search results of a completed institutional funding round, current operations, or large-scale deployment of the platform, suggesting execution and continuity risk beyond the Startup Weekend phase.
The deck’s macro-level critique of the existing economy does not fully translate into a concrete, defensible business model, raising questions about long-term financial sustainability even if social impact is strong.
Time-banking platforms face the classic challenge of building critical mass in local communities; without demonstrated traction or partnerships, network effects may be difficult to achieve, limiting impact and investor returns.
Reliance on open-source, community governance, and crowdfunding can be strengths but also introduce coordination and resourcing risks if no dedicated organization maintains the core infrastructure.

Questions this deck invites

What is the current status of Ggw timebank or any successor platform (e.g., goodgoodwonderful.org, thankful.as): did the team launch a full platform, and is it in active use by any timebanks?
Which specific timebanks (by name and location) adopted or piloted the platform, and what measurable outcomes (number of exchanges, active members, retention) were observed during pilots?
How does the platform intend to generate revenue while staying aligned with its open-source, community-centered mission (e.g., SaaS fees to organizations, support contracts, grants), and what evidence exists that customers will pay?
Who are the core team members behind Ggw timebank, what are their backgrounds in software, community organizing, or finance, and how much capacity do they have to maintain an open-source infrastructure product long-term?
Given existing timebank software and platforms worldwide, what differentiates Ggw timebank in terms of design, functionality, governance, or interoperability, and how will it avoid fragmentation or redundancy?

What founders can take from the Ggw timebank deck

A strong, values-driven narrative that critiques existing economic systems and centers undervalued people can differentiate a social enterprise pitch and resonate with mission-driven judges or investors, as evidenced by Ggw timebank’s second-place finish at a Social Enterprise Startup Weekend.
Demonstrating even a basic MVP and concrete UX flows (such as an activity feed, notifications, and skills matching) helps make an abstract concept like time-banking more tangible to audiences.
Explicit commitments to open-source development, transparency, and community governance can attract aligned partners and funders but must be balanced with a credible plan for financial sustainability.
Showing how a platform supports existing grassroots initiatives (like local timebanks) rather than replacing them can position a startup as an enabler of community economies rather than a top-down disruptor.
Including external validation, such as quotes from respected startup mentors or competition results, can add credibility to an early-stage deck, especially when quantitative traction is limited.
Connecting micro-level features (e.g., a request feed or notifications) to macro-level goals (e.g., refactoring the economy, building an alternative to debt-based banking) can help audiences see how product design choices serve a broader social vision.

Ggw timebank pitch deck: common questions

What is Ggw timebank?

Ggw timebank is an early-stage social enterprise project from around 2013 that proposed a digital time-banking and skills-sharing platform focused on community gratitude and reciprocal exchange of time credits instead of money. It was developed in the context of a Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington and framed as a way to “refactor” the existing debt-based economic system through a more equitable, community-driven model.

What problem does Ggw timebank aim to solve and how?

The pitch deck describes Ggw timebank as a time-banking software platform featuring a common activity feed, gratitude and notification systems, skills mapping, and open data sharing to make it easier for members to post offers and requests, match skills, and track exchanges of hours. It positions the platform as an open-source, transparent infrastructure for local timebanks to support mutual aid and community resilience.

What stage was Ggw timebank at when this pitch deck was created?

According to the deck, Ggw timebank was a project emerging from the first Social Enterprise Startup Weekend in Wellington in 2013, where it won second place and received positive feedback from Startup Weekend organisers such as Dave Moskowitz. It presents itself as a startup-level initiative rather than a fully established non-profit or company, with an MVP website live and plans for further development and crowdfunding.

Did Ggw timebank ever launch or raise funding?

The deck mentions that an MVP website for the time-banking platform was already live and that the team planned to launch a full software platform in 2014, funded at least in part via crowdfunding. It also lists contact information and URLs such as goodgoodwonderful.org and thankful.as as ways to follow the project or get in touch, although there is no externally verified evidence in the search results that these plans were fully executed or that a large institutional fundraise occurred.

How is Ggw timebank related to existing timebanks like the Wellington or Kapiti Time Bank?

The project positions itself as separate from existing local timebanks, focusing instead on building a shared, open-source digital infrastructure that timebanks can use. It references existing communities like Kapiti Time Bank in sample activity feed content but frames Ggw timebank’s role as providing better tools, design, and transparency rather than operating a specific local timebank itself.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

Ggw timebank pitch deck slides

Ggw timebank pitch deck slide 1 of 29 — Ggw timebank pitch deck — slide 1 of 29

Ggw timebank pitch deck slide 2 of 29 — Ggw timebank pitch deck — slide 2 of 29

Ggw timebank pitch deck slide 3 of 29 — Ggw timebank pitch deck — slide 3 of 29

Ggw timebank pitch deck slide 4 of 29 — Ggw timebank pitch deck — slide 4 of 29

Ggw timebank pitch deck slide 5 of 29 — Ggw timebank pitch deck — slide 5 of 29

Ggw timebank pitch deck slide 6 of 29 — Ggw timebank pitch deck — slide 6 of 29

What each slide of the Ggw timebank pitch deck says

Slide 3

About Us Our vision We're building a deeply transparent and open organisation commited to doing this the right way - not by charity but by a commitment to open source, honoring community and building open but financially self sustaining institutions. We're all about using our passion for good design and good tools to make a lasting and permanent difference in this world. Why? Too many people in our society are undervalued, underappreciated and under paid. Every member of our society has gifts to offer it is time we leamed how to appreciate them. Too much of society is organised by the rules of a debt based banking system taking us on a dangerous and unstable journey into unsustainable growt…

Slide 4

About Us s As you can imagine I've seen hundreds of companies come out of Startup Weekends, but I really think that yours is a total standout, and resonates with me in a way that no other SW company ever has before. You guys have a shot at refactoring the crappy world economy that we're all forced to be part of. That's really important work. . Second place winner - Dave Moskowitz Second place at the first Social Enterprise Startup Weekend, Wellington 2013 Hey we won a phone!

Slide 5

Table of Contents Cee «2 About the a About the Software Project aR Questions & Discussion

Slide 8

ommon Activity Fee o= Jack has a request. Can anybody come next tuesday for aworking bee in my garden please? '@ Alex paid Mona 2 hours. Thanks Mona for helping with the car! Mike just joined Kapiti Time Bank! ®00e Rohana has a request Anyone keen to teach me how to play the piano? @ Mica paid Sharon 4 hours. Thanks Mona for helping with the car!

Slide 10

Notifications / Skills Match C—oiae— Jack has posted a request that matches your skills: Jack has areq Can anybody ¢ a working bee Aammant the working bee on Saturday. Alex paid Mona 2 hours... Thanks Mona for helping with the car! TITAMI BAY @ — Mike just joined Kapiti Time Bank! -— o o o m

Slide text above is read directly from the Ggw timebank deck PDF embedded on this page.