Third Eye Pitch Deck (2014): 16-Slide Breakdown

See all 16 slides of the Third Eye pitch deck — a 2014 deck — with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

Third Eye is a 2014 concept-stage pitch by Simon Belousoff for a global medical professional rating and transparency platform. The deck is notable for its heavy emphasis on 'Service Design Frameworks' and personal family medical challenges to establish a problem-solution fit. It positions the product as a 'TripAdvisor for Professional Services,' aiming to provide visibility into doctor success rates and pricing transparency. However, the deck lacks critical investment data: there is no market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), no business model or revenue strategy, no competitive analysis beyond name-drop…

Key takeaways

Executive Summary: A Vision for Healthcare Transparency

The Third Eye pitch deck, dated November 14, 2014, is a conceptual presentation by Simon Belousoff. It proposes a platform designed to bring the transparency of TripAdvisor and Amazon to the medical industry. The deck is heavily rooted in service design principles and personal narrative, aiming to solve the information asymmetry between doctors and patients. While the vision is expansive—targeting a global market for all professional services—the deck lacks the quantitative rigor typically required for a seed or Series A round, omitting market size, revenue models, and a specific capital ask.

Slide 1: Title and Branding

The cover slide introduces the company name, Third Eye , and the presenter, Simon Belousoff . It is dated 14 November 2014 and mentions 'Slingshot Jumpstart,' suggesting this may have been part of an accelerator or incubator program. The imagery features a diverse group of people in a circle, emphasizing a community-centric approach.

Slide 2: Founder Profile

This slide serves as a team slide, though it only features the founder. It includes a screenshot of Belousoff’s LinkedIn profile, highlighting his role as an 'Executive Leader' at Tabcorp . He claims 'extensive digital strategy, product and business development experience.' The focus here is on establishing professional credibility in digital transformation rather than specific healthcare expertise.

Slide 3: Service Design Framework

Belousoff introduces a Service Design Framework used for concept ideation. The slide shows a physical photo of a whiteboard with sticky notes. It lists 'Experience Design Themes' such as Simple, Fast, Easy, Playful, and Reliable/Secure . It also references 'NRMA Brand Values' and 'NRMA Themes' (Connected Cars, Connected Members), which suggests the framework may have been adapted from a previous corporate context or a specific workshop.

Slide 4: The 'New Normal' of Customer Expectations

This slide sets the stage for the market need by comparing the 'Former Normal' to the 'New Normal.' It argues that customers now expect intuitive design, anytime/anywhere access, social engagement, and proactive personalization . The final point, 'More Informed,' explicitly states that digital access empowers research and product comparisons, which is the core thesis of Third Eye.

Slide 5: The Problem - Real Life Medical Challenges

The deck uses three personal anecdotes to illustrate the problem:

1: A mother-in-law who was told she needed surgery for a fractured arm, only to find a second opinion that recommended a sling and rest, which worked. · #2: A son who had a failed grommet operation due to poor communication and a long waiting list for a better specialist. · #3: The birth of three sons where the family had no choice or visibility into the cost of the anaesthetist until the invoice arrived.

These stories highlight three pain points: unnecessary surgery, poor communication/quality, and lack of price transparency.

Slide 6: The 'Aha!' Moment

Belousoff connects the personal problems to a systemic issue. The slide features logos for GetPrice, eBay, Amazon, and TripAdvisor . The text states: 'The internet enables visibility of price & reviews... Think.' This slide functions as the 'Why Now' and 'Market Analogy' slide, suggesting that healthcare is the next logical industry for this digital shift.

Slide 7: The Service Concept

This slide defines the product. The vision is to 'Globally democratize professional services.' The pitch line is 'TripAdvisor for Professional Services, starting with Medical Practitioners.' It clarifies that the model is intended to be global (USA, UK, Western Europe) and will eventually include lawyers, accountants, and dentists. Key differentiators include price visibility via user input and a mobile-first approach . It also describes a 'Customer Use Case' involving a hip replacement in Dubai, suggesting a play in medical tourism.

Slide 8: User Onboarding (Use Case)

This slide shows a mock-up of a sign-up form. It notes that users need to be validated via an 'IDV check' and suggests using social logins (LinkedIn, Facebook). A sticky note indicates the platform would collect a 'Health Profile' including weight, height, gender, and smoking status to better contextualize reviews.

Slide 9: Rating a Specialist

The rating interface is shown as a combination of a digital directory listing (featuring Dr. Jonathan Herald ) and a handwritten review form. The review criteria are: Service with a personal touch, Informs and educates, Value for money, Positive outcome, and Recommend to friends and family. Crucially, it includes a field for 'The cost to you,' citing an example of AUD $15,000 .

Slide 10: Researching Doctors

This slide demonstrates the search functionality. It includes a mock-up of a search bar filtered by location and profession. A handwritten diagram shows how 'selections determine query outcomes,' allowing users to weight what is important to them (e.g., 100% weight on 'Positive outcome' vs. 0% on 'Cost').

Slide 11: Detailed Stats and Data Visualization

To illustrate the depth of data intended for the platform, the deck uses an analogy of NBA player stats . It shows a profile of LeBron James with detailed career stats and a shot chart. A sticky note says: 'Use PRO/Elite sports as the prototype for the depth of stats & the visual presentation.' This suggests the founder wants to move beyond simple star ratings to objective performance metrics.

Slide 12: Comparison Tools

This slide visualizes how a user would compare two surgeons (Dr. Herald vs. Dr. Alfeez). It uses bar charts to show Cost and Positive Outcomes relative to Sydney, Australia, and Global averages. The slide notes: 'Being able to compare empowers the customer.'

Slide 13: Success Factors (Steve Jobs)

The deck shifts from product to philosophy. Belousoff lists 14 'Success Factors' attributed to Steve Jobs , including 'Focus,' 'Simplify,' 'Products before profits,' and 'Stay hungry, stay foolish.' This slide acts as a proxy for a management strategy, though it remains entirely theoretical.

Slide 14: Corporate Values (Atlassian)

Continuing the theme of borrowed frameworks, this slide explicitly states that Third Eye will adopt Atlassian’s corporate values . It displays Atlassian's icons for 'Open company, no bullshit,' 'Build with heart and balance,' 'Don't #@!% the customer,' 'Play, as a team,' and 'Be the change you seek.'

Slide 15: Inspirational Quote

A full-slide quote from Steve Jobs (1993) about doing 'something wonderful' rather than being the 'richest man in the cemetery.' This reinforces the mission-driven narrative of the pitch.

Slide 16: Conclusion

The final slide repeats the cover imagery with the text 'LET'S GO FOR IT!' in a red box. There is no contact information, no summary of the ask, and no next steps provided on the slide itself.

What Works Well

Strong Emotional Hook: The use of specific family medical stories (Slide 5) effectively humanizes the problem. Investors often look for 'founder-market fit,' and these anecdotes demonstrate a personal obsession with solving the lack of transparency in healthcare.

Clear Product Vision: The 'TripAdvisor for X' analogy is a classic pitch technique that immediately communicates the business model and user behavior without needing complex explanations.

Emphasis on Data Visualization: The comparison to sports analytics (Slide 11) is a clever way to explain how complex medical data could be made accessible and engaging for laypeople.

What Is Missing

Business Model and Revenue: There is no mention of how Third Eye will make money. Will it charge doctors for leads? Will it sell anonymized data? Will it take a commission on the 'booking engine' mentioned on Slide 7? The lack of a monetization strategy is a significant gap.

Market Sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM): The deck claims the opportunity is 'Global' (Slide 7) but provides no data on the number of specialists, the volume of elective surgeries, or the potential value of the medical transparency market.

Competitive Landscape: While it mentions TripAdvisor and Amazon as inspirations, it does not address existing medical directories (like Healthgrades or Zocdoc, which were active in 2014). Investors need to know why Third Eye will win against incumbents.

The Ask: The deck concludes with 'Let's go for it!' but does not specify how much capital is being raised, what the milestones are, or what the valuation expectations might be.

Founder Takeaways

Show, Don't Just Tell: The mock-ups and handwritten diagrams (Slides 8-12) are excellent for conveying the user journey. Founders should use these to illustrate unique features that a text description cannot capture.

Avoid 'Borrowed' Culture: While it is fine to be inspired by Atlassian or Steve Jobs, dedicating two full slides (Slides 13-14) to their values rather than your own unique team culture can come across as a lack of original thought regarding organizational design.

Balance Narrative with Data: A pitch deck needs both a 'heart' (the problem/story) and a 'brain' (the numbers). This deck is almost entirely heart. Founders must include a slide on unit economics or market opportunity to be taken seriously by institutional investors.

Frequently asked questions

What is the primary problem Third Eye aims to solve?
Third Eye addresses the lack of transparency in the medical sector. According to Slide 6, the founder identifies a systemic lack of information regarding the quality of service, success benchmarks, and price visibility. The deck argues that while the internet has enabled visibility for retail and travel, healthcare remains opaque, leading to poor patient outcomes and unexpected costs.
How does the company plan to differentiate itself from existing directories?
The differentiation, as stated on Slide 7, lies in being 'customer-centred' rather than 'system-centred.' Key features include user-contributed success benchmarks, price visibility via user input, and data visualization to model the 'best options' based on metrics like price and outcome, rather than just a simple list of names.
What is the proposed user experience for rating a doctor?
Slide 9 illustrates a review process where users provide an 'Alias' for privacy and input specific surgery dates and costs (e.g., 'AUD $15,000'). The rating system uses a 'No Fence' toggle (Yes/No) for metrics like 'personal touch,' 'value for money,' and 'positive outcome,' alongside a free-text 'Your Words' section.
Does the deck provide a roadmap for global expansion?
Slide 7 lists the UK, USA, Western Europe, and developing countries as targets, noting that developing nations often follow an 'exported professional services model.' However, the deck provides no timeline, budget, or specific go-to-market strategy for these regions, remaining at a high conceptual level.
What is the background of the founder?
Slide 2 features a LinkedIn profile for Simon Belousoff, describing him as an 'Executive Leader' with experience at Tabcorp, DashLuxe, and Little Red Box. His expertise is listed in digital strategy, product development, and e-commerce. The deck positions him as a 'value builder' rather than a medical professional.
Cover slide of the Third Eye pitch deck — Concept / Idea 2014
Third Eye pitch deck, slide 1 (2014)

Third Eye pitch deck: the facts

Company
Third Eye
Year
2014
Stage
Concept / Idea
Slides
16
Sector
HealthTech / Professional Services
Deck type
Concept Pitch
Headquarters
Sydney, Australia

Third Eye pitch deck PDF

The full Third Eye deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Third Eye (TripAdvisor for Professional Services concept) pitch deck was used for

Third Eye is presented in a 2014 concept-stage pitch deck as an online platform to act as a "TripAdvisor for Professional Services," initially focused on medical practitioners. The deck proposes a consumer-facing review and information site where patients can compare doctors on success rates, patient reviews, and pricing transparency to make more informed choices about healthcare. The Slideshare deck dated November 2014 appears to be an early service design-led concept rather than a documented fundraising round, and no external evidence links it to a specific company entity, funding round, or later operational business. Available external research instead surfaces an unrelated telehealth company, Third Eye Health, which does not match the "TripAdvisor for medical professionals" marketplace concept described in the deck.

What the Third Eye (TripAdvisor for Professional Services concept) deck got right

What could have been stronger

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Risks that stand out

Questions this deck invites

What founders can take from the Third Eye (TripAdvisor for Professional Services concept) deck

Third Eye (TripAdvisor for Professional Services concept) pitch deck: common questions

What does the Third Eye pitch deck say the product is?

The Third Eye pitch deck (November 2014) describes a consumer web platform positioned as a "TripAdvisor for Professional Services," starting with medical practitioners such as doctors and specialists. It proposes aggregating success rates, patient reviews, and transparent pricing so patients can compare providers before choosing care. No evidence was found that this specific concept was incorporated as a company or launched as a live product.

When was this Third Eye deck used and for what fundraising stage?

Based on the Slideshare upload date and description, the deck was presented in November 2014 at concept/idea stage. There are no externally verified records of a formal funding round tied to this deck, such as press releases, investor announcements, or filings, so any target raise amount or valuation cannot be confirmed.

Is the Third Eye pitch deck related to Third Eye Health, the telehealth company?

External research primarily surfaces "Third Eye Health," a Chicago-based telehealth company founded in 2014 that provides virtual care in post-acute settings. This business focuses on telehealth services and clinical coverage for skilled nursing facilities, not a consumer review marketplace for doctors, and its branding and description differ materially from the deck’s "TripAdvisor for Professional Services" positioning. Because of these mismatches, it cannot be treated as the same company as the one in the deck.

Did the Third Eye concept from this deck ever launch or gain traction?

The Slideshare description and summary indicate a vision-stage proposal relying on service design frameworks and personal anecdotes about navigating healthcare and professional services. There is no evidence of operational metrics, customers, or product screenshots that would suggest a launched platform or significant traction at the time. External sources do not show a later consumer marketplace matching this concept under the same "Third Eye" branding, so any traction claims would be speculative and are therefore omitted.

What investors backed Third Eye and how much did it raise from this deck?

No. Searches across company databases, press coverage, and filings did not uncover any credible funding announcement, investor list, or legal entity clearly tied to this specific "Third Eye" marketplace concept. The deck should therefore be treated as an unverified early-stage concept with no externally documented round attached.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

Third Eye pitch deck slides

Third Eye pitch deck slide 1 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck — slide 1 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck slide 2 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck — slide 2 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck slide 3 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck — slide 3 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck slide 4 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck — slide 4 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck slide 5 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck — slide 5 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck slide 6 of 16
Third Eye pitch deck — slide 6 of 16

What each slide of the Third Eye pitch deck says

Slide 2

My name is Simon Belousoff. I am an executive leader with extensive digital strategy, product and business development experience. The focus of my career to date has been roles in new technology, innovation and digital transformation businesses, re-imaging the future to create value. You can see more of me on LinkedIn at au.linkedin.com/in/simonbelousoff Linked in €®) Third EYE

Slide 3

I used this Service Design Framework for Concept Ideation... It will also be used for prototyping and product development 4, ) 7p, Service Deslen) FrAMEwoRS L<e To cre BE An hfe _— Comp\TnA SIMPLE > 2x pR2ig nes “ret <4 ay our custowmars Pra FUL Love C8 RELIABLE REaRE as 2 4 (®) Third EYE

Slide 4

The Service Design Framework operates in an environment where customers’ expectations of experiences have moved to be a more demanding ‘new normal’ The Former Normal The New Normal 7 Easy and + Some learning required to get proficient at = Expect intuitive design and expectations of Reliable an activity and generally works after that easy execution across all product and delivery promises Vw Anytime, = Channel specific interactions at agreed = Interact with products when and where OERAND Anywhere times and locations they want, any location on any device LCR CINCY - Social engagement and sharing within + Socially engaged physically and digitally ry Naturally nes cE in physical 5 (often concu…

Slide 5

These are real life medical challenges that have happened to my family #1 My mother-in-law Jan had a fall and fractured her arm, high up towards her shoulder. The 1st orthopaedic specialist she saw recommended surgery (not preferred) as the best option. Fortunately the father of a friend of my sister-in- law's daughter was also an orthopaedic specialist. He recommended a sling and #1 rest - Jan went with this and it worked pl v SX q £7 #2 My son Alex needed grommets for his ears. We wanted to go to a popular ear = aa specialist on the North Shore, however the waiting list was long. As a result we wt SBS went to the ear specialist he shared rooms with, even though there was opinion we \. hea…

Slide 6

My wife and I have heard similar real life experiences from friends and family, and have watched on TV/ listened to the radio/ read in the newspaper or online, similar situations on too regular a basis — an indication that these experiences are systemic. What would have been really valuable to us would have been the information needed to make the choice of service provider - quality of service/ success benchmarks + price visibility ] . GETPRICEINI . Compare Before You Buy . br 8 THE INTERNET eb V4 ENABLES VISIBILITY OF PRICE & amazon HA? REVIEWS... THINK NN) AHA} tripadvisor €®) Third EYE

Slide text above is read directly from the Third Eye deck PDF embedded on this page.

Related fundraising guides (24)

Decks from the same year (1)

Decks from the same region (1)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database