Instructure Pitch Deck (2017): 28-Slide Breakdown

See all 28 slides of the Instructure pitch deck — a 2017 deck in EdTech — with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

This 2017 investor deck from Instructure (the company behind the Canvas LMS) focuses on their evolution from a pure-play education technology provider to a diversified enterprise software firm. The deck outlines a strategic expansion into the corporate 'Bridge' platform, targeting a $6.4 billion market opportunity across performance and workforce management. Financially, the deck is exceptionally transparent, providing nine quarters of detailed Non-GAAP income statements and free cash flow reconciliations. While the company remained in a net loss position through Q1 2017, the slides emphasize…

Key takeaways

Instructure: From Classroom to Corporate Boardroom

The Instructure investor deck from May 2017 represents a company at a pivotal transition point. Known primarily for Canvas, the Learning Management System (LMS) that disrupted Blackboard's dominance in higher education, this deck shows Instructure's aggressive push into the corporate sector with its Bridge platform. The presentation is a blend of high-level strategic vision and granular financial reporting, designed to satisfy both growth-oriented and value-focused investors.

Slide 1: Title Slide

The deck opens with a vibrant, multi-colored concentric circle design. It is minimalist, featuring only the company name INSTRUCTURE in white sans-serif block letters. There is no tagline or date on the cover itself, though the source listing identifies this as the 05.08.2017 version. The branding is energetic, suggesting a departure from the stodgy, corporate aesthetic typical of legacy educational software providers.

Slide 4: Product Overview Video

Slide 4 is a placeholder for a PRODUCT OVERVIEW VIDEO . In a live presentation, this serves as a transition point to demonstrate the software's UI/UX. For a deck intended for asynchronous reading, this is a missed opportunity to include screenshots or a link to the video, though it signals that the product's visual appeal is a core selling point.

Slide 7: Substantial Market Opportunity

This slide addresses the Total Addressable Market (TAM). It uses two semi-circle graphics to compare the market in 2016 and 2018. The 2016 market is valued at $5.5 Billion , citing MarketsandMarkets (October 2013) as the source for the Learning Management System market. The 2018 projection jumps to $6.4 Billion . Crucially, the slide lists 'Numerous Adjacencies' that account for this growth: Performance Management, Workforce Management, Recruiting, and Compensation Management . This slide is vital because it tells investors that Instructure is no longer just an 'ed-tech' company; it is an 'HR-tech' company.

Slide 10: Growth Strategy and TAM Expansion

Slide 10 provides a chronological 'stair-step' visualization of the company's expansion. It tracks the launch of different business units:

2011: CANVAS HIGHER ED · 2012: CANVAS K-12 · 2014: CANVAS INTERNATIONAL · 2015: BRIDGE

This slide effectively communicates that the company has a repeatable playbook for entering and scaling in new markets. By 2017, all four pillars are contributing to the revenue stream, supporting the headline: New Products + New Markets = Expanded TAM .

Slide 13: Innovative Management

This is perhaps the most unconventional slide in the deck. It features headshots of eight executives, including Josh Coates (CEO) , Steve Kaminsky (CFO) , and Mitch Macfarlane (COO) . Rather than standard corporate portraits, the executives are shown in humorous, messy, or costumed scenarios (e.g., the CEO holding a blowtorch, the CFO wearing a colorful apron, and the SVP of Engineering covered in what appears to be white powder). Below the names, their impressive pedigrees are listed, including EMC Corp, Mozy.com, Ernst & Young, WebMD, and Microsoft . The juxtaposition of high-level experience with a 'fun' culture is a deliberate attempt to brand the company as a modern, agile tech firm.

Slide 16: Enhanced Visibility into Future Periods

This slide is a powerhouse for demonstrating SaaS health. It focuses on two metrics: Deferred Revenue and Backlog . The Deferred Revenue bar chart shows a climb from $32M (2014) to $52M (2015) and finally $76M (2016) . The Backlog chart is even more impressive, showing $213M in future non-cancellable amounts to be invoiced as of Dec-31-2016. This slide mitigates the risk of the company's current net losses by proving that a massive amount of revenue is already contractually locked in.

Slide 19: High Customer Lifetime Value

Slide 19 uses a standard SaaS unit economics graph. It shows the journey from Acquire to Retain to Renew . The Y-axis represents 'Cumulative Contribution' and the X-axis is 'Lifetime.' The graph shows a Breakeven point shortly after the initial Customer Acquisition Costs are incurred, followed by a long, upward-sloping line for Customer Lifetime Value . While the slide lacks specific dollar amounts for CAC or LTV, the visual reinforces the 'land and expand' nature of their multi-year contracts.

Slide 22: Investment Highlights

This slide serves as the executive summary, listing seven key strengths:

Rapid and Widespread Customer Adoption · Substantial Market Opportunity · Native, Cloud-Based Platform · Focused on User-Experience and Simplicity · Solid Revenue Growth · Enhanced Visibility Through Multi-Year Contracts · Net Revenue Retention Greater than 100%

The retention metric (cited in footnote 1) is a critical proof point for SaaS investors, indicating that existing customers are expanding their spend over time.

Slide 25: Non-GAAP Income Statement

Instructure provides an exceptionally detailed financial table covering nine quarters (Q1'15 through Q1'17). Key data points include:

Revenue: Grew from $14.6M (Q1'15) to $34.0M (Q1'17). · Gross Margin (GM%): Improved from 67% to 72%. · Sales & Marketing (S&M): Decreased as a percentage of revenue from 75% to 53%. · Operating Loss: While still losing money, the loss as a % of revenue improved from (64%) to (28%).

This slide shows a clear trend toward operational efficiency and narrowing losses as the company scales.

Slide 28: Free Cash Flow Reconciliation

The final slide in the provided set is a technical financial table. It reconciles Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities with the purchase of PP&E to arrive at Free Cash Flow . The numbers show significant swings, such as a $20.1M positive FCF in Q3'16 followed by a ($31.2M) negative FCF in Q1'17. This level of disclosure is typical for a public company or a late-stage private company preparing for an IPO, providing a transparent look at the 'lumpiness' of their cash cycles.

What Works in This Deck

1. Financial Transparency: Most pitch decks hide behind vague percentages. Instructure provides raw dollar amounts across nine quarters. This builds immense trust with sophisticated investors and proves the management team has a firm grip on their unit economics.

2. Clear Market Evolution: The 'stair-step' growth strategy slide (Slide 10) is a perfect way to explain how a company moves from a niche player to a broad platform. It justifies why they are entering the corporate market (Bridge) without making it look like a pivot away from their core (Canvas).

3. Backlog as a Moat: By highlighting a $213M backlog, the company effectively 'de-risks' the investment. It shows that even if they stopped selling tomorrow, they have years of revenue already committed.

What Is Missing

1. Competitive Landscape: The deck completely omits a competitor slide. In the LMS space, Blackboard and Moodle are significant rivals, and in the corporate space, they face giants like Workday or Cornerstone OnDemand. Failing to address how they win against these incumbents is a notable gap.

2. Customer Case Studies: While they mention 'Widespread Customer Adoption,' the deck lacks specific logos or testimonials. Seeing which Fortune 500 companies were using Bridge in 2017 would have strengthened the enterprise expansion narrative.

3. Product Deep Dive: Beyond the video placeholder, there are no screenshots of the actual software. For a company that claims 'User-Experience and Simplicity' as a core highlight (Slide 22), the deck relies entirely on the investor's prior knowledge or the live demo.

Founder's Playbook: What to Copy

1. The 'Backlog' Metric: If your startup uses multi-year contracts, do not just report ARR. Report your total contract value (TCV) or backlog. It shows the long-term stability of your revenue stream in a way that monthly figures cannot.

2. Show the Path to Profitability: Instructure was not profitable in 2017, but Slide 25 clearly shows their operating loss shrinking as a percentage of revenue. If you are burning cash, you must show that your margins are improving and your S&M spend is becoming more efficient over time.

3. Humanize the Team: While the 'messy' photos on Slide 13 are risky, they are memorable. Founders should consider how to present their team slide in a way that conveys both professional excellence and a unique company culture. It makes the deck stand out in a sea of boring LinkedIn headshots.

Frequently asked questions

What is Instructure's primary growth strategy according to the deck?
Instructure's strategy is built on 'New Products + New Markets = Expanded TAM.' As shown on Slide 10, they began with Higher Education in 2011, expanded to K-12 in 2012, went international in 2014, and launched their corporate platform, Bridge, in 2015. This allowed them to move from a $5.5 billion LMS market to a $6.4 billion enterprise performance management market.
How does the company demonstrate financial health despite being unprofitable?
The deck emphasizes 'Enhanced Visibility' through multi-year contracts. Slide 16 shows a massive growth in backlog from $113M to $213M over two years. Additionally, Slide 25 shows that while they are losing money, their operating loss as a percentage of revenue improved from 64% in Q1 2015 to 28% in Q1 2017, suggesting a path toward scale.
What are the key components of their $6.4 billion market opportunity?
According to Slide 7, the $6.4 billion figure for 2018 includes four specific adjacencies beyond their core LMS: Performance Management, Workforce Management, Recruiting, and Compensation Management. This indicates the company's intent to compete in the broader Human Capital Management (HCM) space.
What is the significance of the 'Free Cash Flow Reconciliation' slide?
Slide 28 provides extreme transparency, which is rare in many pitch decks. It shows that free cash flow is highly volatile, ranging from a positive $20.1M in Q3 2016 to a negative $31.2M in Q1 2017. This level of detail helps sophisticated investors understand the timing of cash inflows from their subscription-based model.
How does Instructure define its competitive advantage in the deck?
The deck focuses on 'User-Experience and Simplicity' and being a 'Native, Cloud-Based Platform' (Slide 22). By positioning themselves as a modern alternative to legacy systems, they justify their rapid customer adoption and their ability to maintain a net revenue retention rate of over 100%.
Cover slide of the Instructure pitch deck — 2017
Instructure pitch deck, slide 1 (2017)

Instructure pitch deck: the facts

Company
Instructure
Year
2017
Stage
Late Stage / Public (2017)
Slides
28
Sector
EdTech / Enterprise SaaS
Deck type
Investor Presentation
Outcome
Active (Publicly traded at the time of deck)
Headquarters
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Instructure pitch deck PDF

The full Instructure deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the Instructure pitch deck was used for

This is Instructure’s May 2017 investor deck, a 28-slide presentation from a public company that had already gone public in 2015. The deck was used to position the business around continued growth, market expansion from higher education into corporate learning, and financial visibility through quarterly P&L disclosure. The OCR shows it opened with forward-looking statement and non-GAAP disclosures, indicating it was an investor-facing materials set rather than a customer sales deck.

Business model: EdTech / enterprise SaaS platform selling learning management and workplace learning software; by 2017 its deck emphasized Canvas LMS and Bridge corporate platform.

Round
Late stage / public by 2017
Year
2017
Lead investor
OpenView Venture Partners
Investors
OpenView Venture Partners, EPIC Ventures, Tomorrow Ventures, Tim Draper, Bessemer Venture Partners, Insight Venture Partners
Founded
2008
Founders
Josh Coates, Dwight D. Stott, Kristian Andersen, Brian Whitmer
Headquarters
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Industry
Education technology / enterprise software
Total funding
At least $88.9M before its 2015 IPO

Raised: $8M (Series B, 2011) and $30M (Series D, 2013) and $40M (Series E, 2015)

Use of funds as presented: Earlier rounds funded product development and growth; the specific use of funds for the May 2017 deck was not verified.

What happened after the Instructure deck

I verified Instructure’s public-company status and earlier financing history, but I did not verify a new private fundraise tied to this specific May 2017 deck. The materials support a narrative of post-IPO investor communication focused on growth and transparency rather than a clearly identified venture round.

What the Instructure deck got right

What could have been stronger

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Risks that stand out

Questions this deck invites

What founders can take from the Instructure deck

Instructure pitch deck: common questions

What kind of deck is this?

The deck is an investor presentation for Instructure in May 2017, not an early-startup seed deck. It came after the company’s 2015 IPO and was 28 slides long.

What products does the deck focus on?

The deck centers on Instructure’s education software business, especially Canvas LMS and Bridge, its corporate learning platform.

What was the main fundraising or investor thesis?

The deck itself, as described in the excerpt you provided, argued for a $6.4 billion TAM and used quarterly P&L data to support the growth story.

Was this deck tied to a private fundraise?

I could verify that Instructure was already public in 2017; I did not find a new private fundraising round tied to this deck in the sources reviewed.

How much was raised in the round behind this deck?

I could verify the company’s earlier venture rounds and 2015 IPO, but I did not verify any new round amount, valuation, or lead investor for this specific 2017 deck.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

Instructure pitch deck slides

Instructure pitch deck slide 1 of 28
Instructure pitch deck — slide 1 of 28
Instructure pitch deck slide 2 of 28
Instructure pitch deck — slide 2 of 28
Instructure pitch deck slide 3 of 28
Instructure pitch deck — slide 3 of 28
Instructure pitch deck slide 4 of 28
Instructure pitch deck — slide 4 of 28
Instructure pitch deck slide 5 of 28
Instructure pitch deck — slide 5 of 28
Instructure pitch deck slide 6 of 28
Instructure pitch deck — slide 6 of 28

What each slide of the Instructure pitch deck says

Slide 2

FORWARDING LOOKING STATEMENTS & NON-GAAP MEASURES INSTRUCTURE This presentation and the accompanying oral commentary contain "forward-looking" statements, within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are based on our beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations and financial performance, business strategies, potential growth opportunities and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as "…

Slide 3

INSTRUCTURE — that makes - PEOPLE SMARTER = find import share 6 bac 5 © ©0090 06 0 0 0 I = 1 Wi EY EE

Slide 5

THE INSTRUCTURE STORY INSTRUCTURE I Recuring (2016 ~88%) ws) I octerred Revenue Non-recurring (2016 ~12%) $110.9M Backlog oo. $2890 : +65% DU $732M $20aM A +70% y )! uae $44.4M Ed $26.1M sim Ld | | sum | ii $6.4 Billion 2013 2014 2015 2016 2013 2014 2015 2016 ® Headquartered in Salt Lake City with 1000+ employees worldwide >100% retention revenue Offices in London, Sydney, Hong Kong, Brazil ® >2,000 customers in 50 countries’ ® Flagship products Canvas & Bridge 91% Customer Support Satisfaction @ 100% native cloud ‘As of March 31, 2017

Slide 6

BUILDING SUPERIOR SOFTWARE THAT INSTRUCTURE MEETS EVOLVING CONSUMER DEMAND m a Ls 2 A z Ane [SE Consumerized Collaborative addi Mobile Engaging a &2 mE

Slide text above is read directly from the Instructure deck PDF embedded on this page.

Related fundraising guides (24)

This deck's categories (1)

Decks from the same year (1)

Decks from the same region (1)

Browse companies alphabetically (1)

Decks in the same category (12)

More pitch deck teardowns (16)

Company and founder profiles behind this deck (2)

Recently published pitch deck teardowns (12)

Fundraising library · Pitch deck examples · Investor directory · Founder database