What is jvsp's core value proposition?

jvsp differentiates itself by moving away from 'login and click' participation toward 'conversation-driven' learning. According to Slide 1, they aim for a 90% active participation rate by facilitating real conversations between colleagues during training. The solution focuses on three main benefits: improved knowledge retention, higher user satisfaction, and time-saving for administrators during course deployment.

How does the company generate revenue?

The company utilizes a SaaS subscription model with tiered pricing based on user count. As shown on Slide 5, the tiers start with a free version for up to 10 users, moving to 1,800 Euros for 11-25 users, and scaling up to 15,000 Euros for 501-1,000 users. Slide 9 indicates that license income is expected to become the dominant revenue stream over services by 2022.

What kind of market traction has jvsp achieved?

Slide 6 lists several high-profile enterprise clients, including P&G (700 users), Acciona (10,000 users), and Santander (800 users). They also mention a massive scale project with Fundación MAPFRE aiming for 200,000 students. Additionally, their inclusion in the Google For Entrepreneurs program serves as a significant third-party endorsement of their potential.

What are the financial targets for the business?

According to Slide 9, jvsp projected total income to grow from 360,000 Euros in 2018 to nearly 6 million Euros by 2022. They aim to improve their contribution margin from 71% to 84% during this period. The company reported historical income of 200,000 Euros in 2016 and 400,000 Euros in 2017, showing steady early growth.

What is the specific fundraising ask?

Slide 9 states that the company is looking to close a seed round of 200,000 Euros. Interestingly, the slide notes that the investors are expected to be 'consulting partners and friends,' suggesting a strategic approach to fundraising where early backers also serve as distribution channels or industry advisors.

jvsp Pitch Deck (2018): 10-Slide Seed Deck

See all 10 slides of the jvsp pitch deck — a 2018 Seed deck in EdTech — with a slide-by-slide teardown of what the deck does well and where it falls short.

jvsp is a SaaS e-learning platform that prioritizes 'conversation over participation' to solve the issue of low engagement in corporate training. The deck illustrates a clear transition from a services-heavy model to a scalable SaaS subscription structure, with tiers ranging from a free version for 10 users up to 15,000 Euros for 1,000 users. Notably, the company demonstrates significant market validation, listing active projects with major corporations such as Santander, P&G, and Veolia. While the deck lacks a dedicated team slide, it provides detailed financial projections from 2018 to 2022…

Key takeaways

The platform claims to achieve over a 90% active participation rate by focusing on real conversations between colleagues (Slide 1).
jvsp identifies the core problem as e-learning being 'boring' and difficult to deploy without technical skills (Slide 2).
The product is versatile, covering use cases from sales training to cybersecurity across sectors like banking, pharma, and hospitality (Slide 4).
Revenue is generated through a tiered subscription model, with the highest tier priced at 15,000 Euros for 1,000 users (Slide 5).
Market validation is strong, including a project for Fundación MAPFRE expected to reach 200,000 students worldwide (Slide 6).
The company was selected for the Google For Entrepreneurs program, providing access to product and knowledge resources (Slide 6).
Financial projections show a planned increase in active clients from 34 in 2018 to 908 by 2022 (Slide 9).
The deck explicitly states a seed round target of 200,000 Euros, primarily from consulting partners and friends (Slide 9).

Slide 1: Title and Core Philosophy

The deck opens with the trademarked slogan 'CONVERSATION BEATS PARTICIPATION.' The visual identity uses a speech bubble composed of various colorful shapes, reinforcing the focus on communication. The slide sets a high bar for engagement, claiming that while conventional programs achieve bare minimum participation, jvsp clients see over 90% active participation. A footnote defines active participation specifically as 'real conversations with their colleagues.' This slide successfully establishes a clear, opinionated stance on why existing solutions fail.

Slide 2: The Problem

The problem statement is concise, using three bullet points. It identifies that e-learning courses are 'boring' and lack engagement. Crucially, it adds a technical barrier: 'Until now, to implant a learning platform for deploying a course was difficult and needs technical skills.' This frames the problem as both a user experience issue and an operational bottleneck for companies.

Slide 3: The Solution

The solution slide highlights three primary benefits: Improve Knowledge Retention, Higher Satisfaction, and Time Saving. It quotes Jay Cross, stating 'conversation is the most powerful learning technology ever invented.' The text describes the tool as robust, secure, and 'completely mobile.' The 'Time Saving' section emphasizes a simple workflow: search, select content, structure it, and select recipients to create an 'attractive online course.'

Slide 4: Product and Use Cases

This slide provides visual evidence of the platform through six screenshots of various 'Welcome' screens, each customized for different clients (e.g., Veolia, Santander). It categorizes the product's reach into three buckets: What (Sales training, Onboarding, Compliance, etc.), Who (Banking, Pharma, Schools, etc.), and How . The 'How' section provides usage data: 68% Desktop and 32% Mobile, though it notes some projects reach 81% mobile usage.

Slide 5: Revenue Model

jvsp presents a clear, tiered subscription table. The tiers are defined by the number of 'usuarios' (users). The pricing starts at Free for 10 users and scales through several steps: 1,800 for 11-25 users, 3,300 for 26-50 users, 4,200 for 51-100 users, 6,000 for 101-250 users, 8,500 for 251-500 users, and 15,000 for 501-1,000 users. The slide notes they aim to make the solution affordable for organizations of any size.

Slide 6: Market Validation

This is arguably the strongest slide in the deck. It displays logos and specific user counts for ten major organizations. Notable entries include Acciona (10,000 users for sustainability training), Cecabank (over 5,000 users for compliance), and Fundación MAPFRE (learning paths reaching 200,000 students). It also mentions their selection for the Google For Entrepreneurs program, which adds significant credibility.

Slide 7: Marketing and Sales Strategy

A complex flowchart illustrates the sales funnel. It shows multiple lead sources—MailChimp subscribers, Google AdWords, LinkedIn contacts, and LinkedIn cold messaging—feeding into Pipedrive for follow-up. It also highlights a dual go-to-market approach: direct sales and through 'consulting partners' (IT consulting companies). This partner-led strategy explains the later mention of consulting partners as investors.

Slide 8: Competition

The competitive landscape is mapped on a 2x2 grid with 'Pricing' on the Y-axis and 'Difficulty of implementation' on the X-axis. A third dimension, 'Engagement,' is represented by the size of the bubble. jvsp positions itself as having the highest engagement (largest bubble), low difficulty of implementation, and moderate pricing. Competitors plotted include Teachable, Litmos, Moodle, and Cornerstone.

Slide 9: Financials and The Ask

This slide contains a detailed table of projections from 2018e to 2022e. Total income is projected to grow from 360,000 Euros to 5.98 million Euros. The table breaks down income into 'Licenses' and 'Services,' showing a clear shift toward license-heavy revenue. It also lists historical income for 2016 (200,000 Euros) and 2017 (400,000 Euros). The slide concludes with the funding ask: a seed round of 200,000 Euros, targeted at consulting partners and friends.

Slide 10: Contact Information

The final slide is a simple 'Thank you' with a contact email (pablo@jvsp.io) and the company website (www.jvsp.io).

What works in this deck

The market validation slide (Slide 6) is exceptionally strong for a seed-stage company. Listing specific user counts and use cases for global brands like P&G and Nestlé proves that the product has passed enterprise procurement and security hurdles. The clear pricing table (Slide 5) also removes ambiguity about the business model, showing a structured approach to scaling within an organization. Finally, the focus on a single, clear metric—engagement through conversation—gives the deck a cohesive narrative thread.

What is missing from this deck

The most glaring omission is a Team slide. There is no information regarding the founders' backgrounds, their previous experience in EdTech, or the technical team building the product. Additionally, while the competition slide (Slide 8) mentions 'Difficulty of implementation,' the deck does not explain why jvsp is easier to implement than Moodle or Cornerstone. A 'How it Works' slide detailing the administrative backend or the AI/logic driving the conversations would have strengthened the technical case. Lastly, there is no 'Use of Funds' breakdown for the 200,000 Euro ask.

What a founder should copy

Founders should emulate the way jvsp presents their financial projections (Slide 9). By including historical revenue (2016 and 2017) alongside future projections, they provide a baseline of reality that makes the future numbers feel more attainable. The use of a 'What, Who, How' framework for the product slide (Slide 4) is also an effective way to categorize a versatile tool without overwhelming the reader with feature lists. Finally, the strategy of targeting 'consulting partners' as both a sales channel and an investor class is a smart way to align incentives for early-stage growth.

Frequently asked questions

What is jvsp's core value proposition?: jvsp differentiates itself by moving away from 'login and click' participation toward 'conversation-driven' learning. According to Slide 1, they aim for a 90% active participation rate by facilitating real conversations between colleagues during training. The solution focuses on three main benefits: improved knowledge retention, higher user satisfaction, and time-saving for administrators during course deployment.
How does the company generate revenue?: The company utilizes a SaaS subscription model with tiered pricing based on user count. As shown on Slide 5, the tiers start with a free version for up to 10 users, moving to 1,800 Euros for 11-25 users, and scaling up to 15,000 Euros for 501-1,000 users. Slide 9 indicates that license income is expected to become the dominant revenue stream over services by 2022.
What kind of market traction has jvsp achieved?: Slide 6 lists several high-profile enterprise clients, including P&G (700 users), Acciona (10,000 users), and Santander (800 users). They also mention a massive scale project with Fundación MAPFRE aiming for 200,000 students. Additionally, their inclusion in the Google For Entrepreneurs program serves as a significant third-party endorsement of their potential.
What are the financial targets for the business?: According to Slide 9, jvsp projected total income to grow from 360,000 Euros in 2018 to nearly 6 million Euros by 2022. They aim to improve their contribution margin from 71% to 84% during this period. The company reported historical income of 200,000 Euros in 2016 and 400,000 Euros in 2017, showing steady early growth.
What is the specific fundraising ask?: Slide 9 states that the company is looking to close a seed round of 200,000 Euros. Interestingly, the slide notes that the investors are expected to be 'consulting partners and friends,' suggesting a strategic approach to fundraising where early backers also serve as distribution channels or industry advisors.

Cover slide of the jvsp pitch deck — Seed 2018 — jvsp pitch deck, slide 1 (2018)

jvsp pitch deck: the facts

Company: jvsp
Year: Not stated…
Stage: Seed
Slides: 10
Sector: EdTech / Enterprise SaaS
Deck type: Investor Pitch Deck
Outcome: Not stated
Headquarters: Not stated (Financials in EUR, mentions Europe/LATAM)

jvsp pitch deck PDF

The full jvsp deck is embedded on this page and can be read slide by slide in the browser — no download or account required. Each slide is covered in the breakdown above.

What the jvsp pitch deck was used for

This is the jvsp investor pitch deck published on SlideShare in November 2017, used to raise a **seed round** for a conversation‑driven SaaS learning platform (LMS) that replaces traditional ‘login and click’ e‑learning with collaborative, discussion‑based courses. The deck presents early enterprise adoption, claiming over 90% active participation in onboarding, compliance, leadership, sales academies, and educational programs for large clients, and positions jvsp as a simple, mobile, robust platform. The deck includes basic financials (2016–2017 revenues) and states they are “going to close a seed round of 200,000 €,” with investors expected to be consulting partners and friends. Projections in the deck begin in 2018, aligning with the user‑provided metadata that this was an early‑stage (seed) raise.

Business model: SaaS learning platform (LMS) that organizations subscribe to in order to create and manage online training programs focused on conversation-driven learning.

Round: Seed
Founders: Pablo Navarro Rubio
Headquarters: Madrid, Spain.
Industry: EdTech / Learning Management System (LMS).

Year: 2017 (deck dated November 14, 2017 on SlideShare).

Raising: Seed round of 200,000 € stated as “we are going to close a seed round of 200,000.00 €” with investors described as consulting partners and friends; no external confirmation of closure or participants is publicly available.

What the jvsp deck got right

Strong, consistent product narrative around conversation‑driven learning. The deck and supporting materials articulate a **clear, differentiated thesis** that conversation and peer discussion drive better learning outcomes than traditional ‘login and click’ e‑learning, and this message is repeated consistently across the slides, website, LinkedIn, and app descriptions.
Compelling ease‑of‑use and deployment story. The product is presented as a **simple, mobile‑friendly SaaS platform** that is easy for non‑technical administrators to use, addressing a common pain point that implementing learning platforms has historically required technical skills and complex setup.
Evidence of early revenue traction. The deck reports **2016 and 2017 income figures**, indicating that jvsp already had revenue and paying customers at the time of the seed pitch, which supports the claim of early market validation beyond mere pilots.
Versatile use cases across corporate and educational training. The slides emphasize multi‑use applicability—onboarding, compliance, leadership and sales academies, and educational curricula—and external descriptions confirm a broad feature set (gamification, integrations with tools like Genially and Typeform, discussions, mobile access), suggesting **versatile use cases** across corporate and educational training.
Alignment between pitch deck claims and later product positioning. Consistency between the deck’s claims (conversation‑centric LMS, >90% active participation, mobile and robust) and later external descriptions (website, app listing, founder’s LinkedIn) suggests **execution continuity** on the original product concept rather than frequent pivoting.

What could have been stronger

Unspecified round commitments and terms. The deck states that they are “going to close a seed round of 200,000 €” with investors being consulting partners and friends, but it does not specify any **committed investors, terms, valuation, or timeline**, making it difficult for an outside investor to assess round certainty or structure.
Unsubstantiated engagement metrics. While the deck claims **over 90% active participation** across multiple use cases, it does not present underlying data, cohort analyses, or third‑party validation; the definition of active participation as ‘real conversations with colleagues’ is qualitative, and there are no retention, completion, or ROI metrics shown.
Limited discussion of competition and defensibility. The slides emphasize features (conversation, ease of use, mobile, robustness) but provide little detail on **competitive landscape, differentiation against other LMS/EdTech platforms, or barriers to entry**, leaving investors to infer how defensible the product is in a crowded market.
Sparse financial and SaaS economics detail. The financial slide in the deck lists income for 2016 and 2017 and then jumps to stating the seed round size, but does not break down **unit economics, pricing model, customer acquisition costs, or revenue composition** (e.g., recurring vs. one‑off services), which are important to evaluate SaaS scalability.
Limited concrete traction evidence in slides. Client validation in the deck is described in qualitative terms (diverse clients, multiple types of training, high participation), but there are no **named customer logos, case studies, or contracts** shown on the OCR text, which would strengthen the traction story, especially for claimed global brand adoption.

How an investor would read this deck

What draws attention

Self‑consistent narrative around **conversation‑driven learning** as a differentiator, echoed across the deck, website, LinkedIn, and app descriptions, suggesting a clear product vision and positioning.
Evidence of ongoing product development and commercialization beyond the deck’s date, such as a maintained website, a mobile app in app stores, and continued positioning as an LMS, indicating persistence and potential product‑market fit in certain niches.
Early revenue figures in the deck (2016 and 2017 income) which, although not detailed, indicate that the company had paying customers at the time of the seed fundraising effort.
The founder’s background as CEO and founder of an EdTech SaaS company focused on high participation training, demonstrating relevant experience and domain focus.

Risks that stand out

Crowded LMS and EdTech market with many better‑capitalized competitors, and limited information in the deck on how jvsp builds a sustainable moat beyond emphasizing conversation and gamification.
Dependence on qualitative engagement claims like “over 90% active participation” without publicly available, independently verified metrics, raising questions about reproducibility of results across customers.
Lack of publicly disclosed funding history or investor base beyond the stated goal of a 200,000 € seed round, which may indicate relatively constrained resources for scaling product and sales.
Potentially narrow differentiation focus (conversation‑driven learning) that competitors can emulate, especially as discussion forums, chat, and social features are standard in many modern LMS systems.

Questions this deck invites

Can you provide **updated financials** (MRR/ARR, churn, LTV/CAC, cohort behavior) since 2017, and how do these compare to the income figures reported in the original deck?
What **evidence and methodology** support the claim of over 90% active participation, and can you share anonymized engagement dashboards or third‑party validation for key customers?
Who ultimately participated in the **seed round the deck references**, what were the round terms (valuation, ownership), and have you raised any subsequent funding or grants since then?
How does jvsp compete with **mainstream LMS and EdTech platforms**, which segments or geographies are you winning, and what specific product capabilities or integrations (e.g., Genially, Typeform, Kumu, gamification) are most defensible?
What are your **current go‑to‑market channels and customer profiles** (enterprise vs. mid‑market vs. education), and what does your sales cycle look like for onboarding and compliance training customers?

What founders can take from the jvsp deck

A **sharp problem statement**—in this case that traditional e‑learning is boring, non‑engaging, and hard to implement—helps anchor the deck and make the solution’s value proposition intuitive and relatable to enterprise buyers and investors.
Aligning all messaging around a **single core differentiator** (conversation as the most powerful learning technology) creates a cohesive narrative that persists across the deck, website, and app copy, making the brand positioning easier to remember.
Including even basic **early revenue figures** (such as 2016 and 2017 income) signals that the product is beyond idea stage and has paying customers, which is particularly important at seed.
Defining and explaining a **custom engagement metric** (active participation as real conversations) can be compelling, but investors will expect supporting data and methodology; without it, strong claims may invite skepticism rather than confidence.
Demonstrating that the product is **mobile, robust, and easy to deploy** for non‑technical users directly addresses common barriers in LMS adoption, which can be a persuasive angle in enterprise SaaS pitches.
Maintaining a consistent product and messaging line over time—e.g., carrying the same conversation‑centric thesis from a 2017 deck into later website and app materials—helps show that the company is executing against a stable thesis rather than frequently pivoting.

jvsp pitch deck: common questions

What is jvsp and what does the company do?

jvsp is a **learning management system (LMS)** and SaaS platform designed to make online training more engaging by centering it around conversation and collaboration rather than passive ‘login and click’ content. It allows organizations to build courses that integrate discussions, gamification, and interactive content so learners participate actively and talk to each other around each learning object.

How much money was jvsp trying to raise with this pitch deck?

According to the 2017 investor pitch deck, jvsp was **planning to close a seed round of 200,000 €**, with investors described as consulting partners and friends. There is no externally verified public record confirming that this specific seed round was closed, who the investors were, or on what terms; available public profiles and databases do not list specific financing events or amounts for jvsp.

Who is jvsp’s target customer and what training problems does it solve?

The deck and later company materials state that jvsp focuses on **enterprise and institutional training** use cases like onboarding, compliance training, leadership and sales academies, and educational curricula, with an emphasis on large organizations. External descriptions highlight use in corporate learning and higher‑education style programs, and the deck itself references global brands such as Nestlé and P&G as validation, though those specific client names appear in secondary commentary rather than in the OCR text.[source_page]

Did jvsp really achieve over 90% active participation in courses?

The deck claims that jvsp’s clients achieve **over 90% active participation**, which the company defines as learners having real conversations with their colleagues in the context of courses and communities. This claim appears consistently in the deck, the company website, the mobile app description, and the founder’s LinkedIn profile, but there is no independently audited metric or third‑party study publicly available to validate the 90% figure beyond these self‑reported materials.

Where can I find the jvsp investor pitch deck and what does it contain?

The pitch deck is uploaded to SlideShare under the title **“jvsp Investor Pitch Deck”** and dated November 14, 2017. It contains 10 slides, covers the problem of boring, low‑engagement e‑learning, presents jvsp’s conversation‑centric solution, includes early financials (2016 and 2017 income), and ends with a stated goal of closing a 200,000 € seed round. The deck also lists a contact email (pablo@jvsp.io) and points to the company site jvsp.io, linking it clearly to the jvsp LMS product that continues to be promoted on the current website.

Sources

Funding and outcome facts on this page were researched on 2026-08-22 from the pages below.

jvsp pitch deck slides

jvsp pitch deck slide 1 of 10 — jvsp pitch deck — slide 1 of 10

jvsp pitch deck slide 2 of 10 — jvsp pitch deck — slide 2 of 10

jvsp pitch deck slide 3 of 10 — jvsp pitch deck — slide 3 of 10

jvsp pitch deck slide 4 of 10 — jvsp pitch deck — slide 4 of 10

jvsp pitch deck slide 5 of 10 — jvsp pitch deck — slide 5 of 10

jvsp pitch deck slide 6 of 10 — jvsp pitch deck — slide 6 of 10

What each slide of the jvsp pitch deck says

Slide 1

CONVERSATIO BEATS PARTICIPATION' In our experience, conventional online learning programs achieve only a bare minimum "login and click" participation because they fail to inspire genuine conversation. Our diverse range of clients are using JVSP to get over a 90% active participation (*) rate in their onboarding processes, compliance trainings, leadership and sales academies, and educational curriculums. (*) For us, active participation means real conversations with ther colleagues O 0)°() S JVSP

Slide 2

* Elearning courses are boring. » These courses don't promote engagement. * Until now, to implant a learning platform for deploying a course was difficult and needs technical skills.

Slide 3

The solution We have built a SaaS learning tool that provides the following beneficts: IMPROVE KNOWLEDGE RETENTION JVSP is designed to promote conversation among students. As Jay Cross explains, "conversation is the most powerful learning technology ever invented." HIGHER SATISFACTION The system is very easy to use for each type of user. The tool is robust, secure and completely mobile. TIME SAVING Search and select the content, structure it, select the recipients and you will already have a very attractive online course.

Slide 4

_- omen 1 Weleorne Weleome NS Welccriic oo o64 - Apron” detoted SB 25| a43¢d),/ 6/64 Bk ———en 7 rr) EES h— - he No ; 7 261 24th "8/64 = 359 10th 8/64 [] o 0/64 Oz £ 3 I - 8 What Who How « Sales training « Soft Skills « Banking + Schools * 68% Desktop « Leadership * Onboarding « Telecommu- + Hospitality + 32% Mobile nications i + Safety driving + Sustainability + Consumer + With projects . p « Energy and goods reaching 81% + Compliance « Cybersecutiry infrastructures i mobile. « Foundations « Pharma

Slide 5

Revenue model We use a subscription model with different user’s tiers. We try to make the solution affordable for organizations of any size. 10 usuarios *FREE 11-25 usuarios 1,800 26-50 usuarios 3,300 51-100 usuarios 4,200 101-250 usuarios 6,000 251-500 usuarios 8,500 501-1000 usuarios 15,000

Slide 6

Market Validation Begining with 700 users in % 10,000 users, Sustainability Europe, Digital transformation Jacciona training learning program. 0 Learning paths that are goin Fundacion = = 2,000 users. LATAM onboarding for to reach more than 200,000 @veoua . new employees. MAPFRE | cots woriawice. Fey JOU N@StIE | 30 users.sales academy. 150 users. Soft skills academy. cecabanl| "etiwseeotusey RoamMate. 20 users. Leadershiptraining. Compliance MiFID II. HOTELS 800 users. Sales academy. (Vos 800 users. Sales academy. movistar Google For Entrepreneurs nos ha seleccionado para entrar en su programa lo cual nos da acceso a Producto y Conocimiento. Google for Entrepreneurs

Slide text above is read directly from the jvsp deck PDF embedded on this page.